| Literature DB >> 32151253 |
Sheng-Nan Wang1, Yun Sun1,2, Huan-Huan Zhou3,4,5, Gang Lu3,4,5, Meng Qi6, Wei-Shi Liu7, Wei Zhao8,9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi are two important pathogens with zoonotic potential that cause enteric infections in a wide range of hosts, including humans. Both are transmitted from animals to humans by direct contact or through contaminated equipment. Bears are frequently found in Chinese zoos as ornamental animals as well as farmed as commercial animals, and are therefore in close contact with zoo- or farm-keepers, but the prevalence and zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium and E. bieneusi in bears is poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to provide data on the occurrence and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium and E. bieneusi in Asiatic black bears from Heilongjiang and Fujian, China. From May 2015 to December 2017, 218 fresh fecal specimens were collected from captive Asiatic black bears in Heilongjiang (n = 36) and Fujian (n = 182), China. Cryptosporidium and E. bieneusi were examined by PCR amplification of the partial small subunit of ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA, respectively. C. andersoni-positive isolates were subtyped through PCR analysis of the four minisatellite/microsatellite (MS1, MS2, MS3 and MS16) loci.Entities:
Keywords: Bear; Cryptosporidium; Enterocytozoon bieneusi; Genotypic; Identification
Year: 2020 PMID: 32151253 PMCID: PMC7063761 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02292-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Prevalence and Cryptosporidium species/genotypes and E. bieneusi genotypes in bears according to age, gender and feeding mod
| Group | Fujian | Heilongjiang | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Examined No. | Examined No. | |||||||||
| Positive No. (%) | Genotype (n) | Positive No. (%) | Species/genotype (n) | Positive No. (%) | Genotype (n) | Positive No. (%) | Species/genotype (n) | |||
| Age | ||||||||||
| < 3(year) | 17 | 1 (5.9) | D (1) | 1 (5.9) | Rat genotype IV (1) | 12 | 4 (33.3) | SC02 (4) | 0 | / |
| 3–5(year) | 122 | 5 (4.1) | D (3); SC02 (2) | 0 | / | – | – | – | 0 | / |
| > 5 (year) | 43 | 0 | / | 2 (4.7) | 24 | 4 (16.7) | SC02 (4) | 1 (4.2) | ||
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Male | 118 | 4 (3.4) | D (2); SC02 (2) | 3 (2.5) | Rat genotype IV (1); | 15 | 3 (20.0) | SC02 (3) | 1 (6.7) | |
| Female | 64 | 2 (3.1) | D (2) | 0 | / | 21 | 5 (23.8) | SC02 (5) | 0 | / |
| Feeding mode | ||||||||||
| Alone | 92 | 4 (4.3) | D (3); SC02 (1) | 2 (2.2) | 36 | 8 (22.2) | SC02 (8) | 1 (2.8) | ||
| Group | 90 | 2 (2.2) | D (1); SC02 (1) | 1 (1.1) | Rat genotype IV (1) | – | – | – | 0 | / |
| Total | 182 | 6 (3.3) | D (4); SC02 (2) | 3 (1.6) | Rat genotype IV (1); | 36 | 8 (22.2) | SC02 (8) | 1 (2.8) | |