| Literature DB >> 32151210 |
Sarah Dion1, Kriti Gogia2, Alyssa Elman2, Sunday Clark2, Page Ulrey3, Marie-Therese Connolly4, Stuart Lewis5, Veronica M LoFaso6, Mark S Lachs6, Julie Wartell7, Tony Rosen2.
Abstract
Elder mistreatment is complex, with cases typically requiring integrated responses from social services, medicine, civil law, and criminal justice. Only limited research exists describing elder mistreatment prosecution and its impact. Researchers have not yet examined administrative prosecutorial data to explore mistreatment response, and no standardized analytic approach exists. We developed a rigorous, systematic methodologic approach to identify elder mistreatment cases in prosecutorial data from cases of crimes against victims aged ≥60. To do so, we operationalized elements of the accepted definition of elder mistreatment, including expectation of trust and vulnerability. We also designed an approach to categorize elder mistreatment cases, using the types of charges filed, into: financial exploitation, physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal/emotional/psychological abuse, and neglect. This standardized methodological approach to identify and categorize elder mistreatment cases in prosecution data is an important preliminary step in analyzing this potentially untapped source of useful information about mistreatment response.Entities:
Keywords: Criminal justice elder abuse; elder mistreatment; methodology; prosecution
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32151210 PMCID: PMC7328292 DOI: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1733725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Elder Abuse Negl ISSN: 0894-6566