Literature DB >> 32150870

Comparative Root Transcriptomics Provide Insights into Drought Adaptation Strategies in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Vijay Bhaskarla1, Gaurav Zinta2, Rebecca Ford3, Mukesh Jain4, Rajeev K Varshney5, Nitin Mantri1.   

Abstract

Drought adversely affects crop production across the globe. The root system immensely contributes to water management and the adaptability of plants to drought stress. In this study, drought-induced phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of two contrasting chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes were compared at the vegetative, reproductive transition, and reproductive stages. At the vegetative stage, drought-tolerant genotype maintained higher root biomass, length, and surface area under drought stress as compared to sensitive genotype. However, at the reproductive stage, root length and surface area of tolerant genotype was lower but displayed higher root diameter than sensitive genotype. The shoot biomass of tolerant genotype was overall higher than the sensitive genotype under drought stress. RNA-seq analysis identified genotype- and developmental-stage specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to drought stress. At the vegetative stage, a total of 2161 and 1873 DEGs, and at reproductive stage 4109 and 3772 DEGs, were identified in the tolerant and sensitive genotypes, respectively. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed enrichment of biological categories related to cellular process, metabolic process, response to stimulus, response to abiotic stress, and response to hormones. Interestingly, the expression of stress-responsive transcription factors, kinases, ROS signaling and scavenging, transporters, root nodulation, and oxylipin biosynthesis genes were robustly upregulated in the tolerant genotype, possibly contributing to drought adaptation. Furthermore, activation/repression of hormone signaling and biosynthesis genes was observed. Overall, this study sheds new insights on drought tolerance mechanisms operating in roots with broader implications for chickpea improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abiotic stress; chickpea; drought; gene expression; hormone; root; signaling

Year:  2020        PMID: 32150870     DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  6 in total

1.  An integrated transcriptome mapping the regulatory network of coding and long non-coding RNAs provides a genomics resource in chickpea.

Authors:  Mukesh Jain; Juhi Bansal; Mohan Singh Rajkumar; Rohini Garg
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-10-19

Review 2.  Emerging Roles of SWEET Sugar Transporters in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Responses.

Authors:  Tinku Gautam; Madhushree Dutta; Vandana Jaiswal; Gaurav Zinta; Vijay Gahlaut; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Metabolomics and health: from nutritional crops and plant-based pharmaceuticals to profiling of human biofluids.

Authors:  Andrey S Marchev; Liliya V Vasileva; Kristiana M Amirova; Martina S Savova; Zhivka P Balcheva-Sivenova; Milen I Georgiev
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Chickpeas from a Chilean Region Affected by a Climate-Related Catastrophe: Effects of Water Stress on Grain Yield and Flavonoid Composition.

Authors:  Adriano Costa de Camargo; Hernán Speisky; Raquel Bridi; Paula Núñez Pizarro; Arturo Larena; Ana Clara da C Pinaffi-Langley; Fereidoon Shahidi; Andrés R Schwember
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Overexpression of a Gene Encoding Trigonelline Synthase from Areca catechu L. Promotes Drought Resilience in Transgenic Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Yilin Li; Mengying Ding; Chuang Cui; Qiyuan An; Jiao Wu; Guangzhen Zhou; Yinglang Wan; Wenlong Bao
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 6.  A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Breeding for Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Climate Change Resilience.

Authors:  Osvin Arriagada; Felipe Cacciuttolo; Ricardo A Cabeza; Basilio Carrasco; Andrés R Schwember
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.