| Literature DB >> 32150531 |
Huiyou Xu1,2, Zhilong Jia1, Ke Ma1,2, Jian Zhang1,2, Chen Dai1,2, Zitong Yao1,2, Wusheng Deng1,2, Jianzhong Su1, Renjie Wang1, Xuyi Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transplantation of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs-Exo) can improve the recovery of neurological function in rats after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We tested a new hypothesis that BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo could effectively promote functional recovery and neurogenesis of rats after TBI. MATERIAL AND METHOD BMSCs of rats were extracted by whole bone marrow culture, BDNF was added to BMSCs for intervention, supernatant was collected, and exosomes were separated and purified by hypercentrifugation. Exosomes were identified by WB, TEM and particle size analysis and subsequently used in cell and animal experiments. We investigated the recovery of sensorimotor function and spatial learning ability, inflammation inhibition and neuron regeneration in rats after TBI. RESULTS Compared with group MSCs-Exo, group BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo showed better effects in promoting the recovery of sensorimotor function and spatial learning ability. BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo successfully inhibited inflammation and promoted neuronal regeneration in vivo and in vitro. We further analyzed miRNA in BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo and MSCs-Exo, and found that the expression of miR-216a-5p in BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo was significantly higher than that in MSCs-Exo by qRT-PCR. Rescue experiment indicated that miR-216a-5p has a similar function to BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, we found that BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo can better promote neurogenesis and inhibit apoptosis than MSCs-Exo in rats after TBI, and the mechanism may be related to the high expression of miR-216a-5p.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32150531 PMCID: PMC7081927 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.920855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Characterizations of exosomes. (A, B) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of MSCs-Exo and BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo (BDNF*MSCs-Exo) (scale bar: 100 nm). (C) Both CD9 and CD63 were positively expressed in MSCs-Exo and BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo as determined by Western blot assay. (D, E) The peak of MSCs-Exo diameter was 110 nm, and the peak of BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo diameter was 118 nm as detected by NTA. There were no significant differences in the concentration and diameter distribution between MSCs-Exo and BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo.
Figure 2BDNF-mediated MSCs-Exo significantly enhanced migration and inhibited oxidative stress injury and apoptosis in PC12 cells. (A) Both MSCs-Exo and BDNF*MSCs-Exo promoted cell migration after cell scratch (scale bar: 100 μm). (B) BDNF*MSCs-Exo significantly increased the viability of PC12 cells after oxidative stress injury (n=5). (C, D) BDNF*MSCs-Exo significantly increased SOD activity and decreased ROS levels after oxidative stress injury (n=5). (E) Apoptosis of PC12 cells was detected by TUNEL staining after H2O2 injury (scale bar: 100 μm). (F) The average TUNEL+cell number at high magnification (n=6). * Mean significant difference vs. the PBS group (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01). # Mean significant difference vs. the MSCs-Exo group (# P<0.05).
Figure 3BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo significantly promoted the recovery of sensorimotor function and spatial learning function, and BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo inhibited cell apoptosis and promoted neuron regeneration in rats after TBI. (A) The movement path diagram of the rats in the water maze was analyzed by the software after 4 days of training in the water maze. (B) BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo significantly improved the spatial learning ability of TBI rats (n=6). (C) The time rats swam around the platform after removing the platform (n=6). (D) The mNSS test indicated that rats in the BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo group recovered better than those in the MSC-Exo group (n=6). (E) The apoptosis of brain cells in the BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo group was significantly less than that in the MSC-Exo group, as detected by TUNEL staining after TBI (scale bar: 200 μm). (F) The average TUNEL+cell number at high magnification (n=6). (G) The expression of DCX+cells in brain tissues was observed 7 days after TBI in rats (scale bar: 100 μm). (H) The average number of DCX+cells at high magnification (n=6). * Mean significant difference vs. the PBS group (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01). # Mean significant difference vs. the MSCs-Exo group (# P<0.05).
Figure 4The high expression of miR-216a-5p in BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo inhibited inflammation and promoted neurogenesis. (A) Fold changes in miRNA expression within EVs between MSCs-Exo and BDNF-induced MSCs-Exo (n=5 per group). (B) Apoptosis of PC12 cells was detected by TUNEL staining after H2O2 injury (scale bar: 200 μm). (C) The average TUNEL+cell number at high magnification (n=6). (D) According to miRBase, NEUROG2 is the downstream target protein of miR-216a-5p. (E) Western blot analysis of HMGB1 in PC12 cells. (F) Quantitative data of HMGB1 levels were normalized to the relevant β-actin levels (n=4). (G) Western blot analysis of NEUROG2 in PC12 neural stem cells. (H) Quantitative data of NEUROG2 levels were normalized to the relevant β-actin levels (n=4). * Mean significant difference vs. the PBS group (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01). # Mean significant difference vs. the MSCs-Exo group (# P<0.05).
The selected 22 miRNAs have been scientifically proven to play a role in neuroprotective effects.
| miRNA | References |
|---|---|
| 1.miR-137-5p | (DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201906_18030) |
| 2.miR-184 | (DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27158) |
| 3–4.miR-199, miR-214 | (DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.86) |
| 5.miR- 485-3p | (DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14743) |
| 6.miR-126 | (DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.043) |
| 7.miR −26a | (DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14774) |
| 8. miR- 129-5p | (DOI: 10.1096/fj.201801094RR) |
| 9.miR- 24-3p | (DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03290-3) |
| 10.miR-133b | (DOI: 10.1007/s12035-018-1005-0) |
| 11.miR- 106b | (DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1387-6) |
| 12.miR- 21a | (DOI: 10.1186/s12964-019-0418-3) |
| 13.miR- 153 | (DOI: 10.1038/s41418-019-0388-4) |
| 14.miR −135a-5p | (DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.04.020) |
| 15.miR- 3099 | (DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.02.014) |
| 16.miR-92b-3p | (DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.04.009) |
| 17.miR- 27b | (DOI: 10.1002/2211–5463.12614) |
| 18.miR-132 | (DOI: 10.1002/term.2759) |
| 19.miR-195 | (DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2018.11.011) |
| 20.miR-210 | (DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1777-16.2017) |
| 21.miR-17-92 | (DOI: 10.1096/fj.201801019R) |
| 22.miR-216a-5p | (DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116948) |