Literature DB >> 32150209

Moving Towards Common Data Elements and Core Outcome Measures in Frailty Research.

J Muscedere1, J Afilalo, I Araujo de Carvalho, M Cesari, A Clegg, H E Eriksen, K R Evans, G Heckman, J P Hirdes, P M Kim, B Laffon, J Lynn, F Martin, J C Prorok, K Rockwood, L Rodrigues Mañas, D Rolfson, G Shaw, B Shea, S Sinha, O Theou, P Tugwell, V Valdiglesias, B Vellas, N Veronese, L M K Wallace, P R Williamson.   

Abstract

With aging populations around the world, frailty is becoming more prevalent increasing the need for health systems and social systems to deliver optimal evidence based care. However, in spite of the growing number of frailty publications, high-quality evidence for decision making is often lacking. Inadequate descriptions of the populations enrolled including frailty severity and frailty conceptualization, lack of use of validated frailty assessment tools, utilization of different frailty instruments between studies, and variation in reported outcomes impairs the ability to interpret, generalize and implement the research findings. The utilization of common data elements (CDEs) and core outcome measures (COMs) in clinical trials is increasingly being adopted to address such concerns. To catalyze the development and use of CDEs and COMs for future frailty studies, the Canadian Frailty Network (www.cfn-nce.ca; CFN), a not-for-profit pan-Canadian nationally-funded research network, convened an international group of experts to examine the issue and plan the path forward. The meeting was structured to allow for an examination of current frailty evidence, ability to learn from other COMs and CDEs initiatives, discussions about specific considerations for frailty COMs and CDEs and finally the identification of the necessary steps for a COMs and CDEs consensus initiative going forward. It was agreed at the onset of the meeting that a statement based on the meeting would be published and herein we report the statement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frailty; common data elements; core outcome measures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32150209     DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2019.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Frailty Aging        ISSN: 2260-1341


  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with change in frailty scores and long-term outcomes in older adults with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Michael Gharacholou; Joshua P Slusser; Ryan J Lennon; Carolyn R Flock; Leslie T Cooper; Patricia A Pellikka; Jorge Brenes Salazar; Mandeep Singh
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  An international Delphi consensus process to determine a common data element and core outcome set for frailty: FOCUS (The Frailty Outcomes Consensus Project).

Authors:  Jeanette C Prorok; Paula R Williamson; Beverley Shea; Darryl Rolfson; Leocadio Rodriguez Mañas; Matteo Cesari; Perry Kim; John Muscedere
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Clegg; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Amanda Farrin; Anne Forster; Thomas M Gill; John Gladman; Ngaire Kerse; Richard Lindley; Richard J McManus; Rene Melis; Ruben Mujica-Mota; Parminder Raina; Kenneth Rockwood; Ruth Teh; Danielle van der Windt; Miles Witham
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 12.782

Review 4.  Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review.

Authors:  Christophe Alain Fehlmann; Christian Hans Nickel; Emily Cino; Zinnia Al-Najjar; Nigèle Langlois; Debra Eagles
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.472

5.  EuGMS 2019 Congress report: evidence-based medicine in geriatrics.

Authors:  Suzy V Hope; Anastasia Koutsouri; Sylvain Nguyen; Karolina Piotrowicz; Mirko Petrovic; Jerzy Gasowski
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.710

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.