| Literature DB >> 32149239 |
Jing Mao1, Peng Zhang1, Xin Liu1, Yanxia Liu2, Guosheng Shao1, Kehua Dai3.
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in the field of new energy vehicles and energy storage. Understanding the electrode reaction of lithium-ion batteries is the key to improve their cycle life and safety. Direct measurement of thermodynamic data of the electrode reaction is a practical, economical, and nondestructive method for electrode characterization. In this paper, the open-circuit voltage of the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li half-cell is measured at different discharge states and different temperatures. The dE/dT-SOD (state of discharge) relation curves are fitted linearly by the least square method, and the entropy change values of different SODs are calculated. Finally, the Gibbs free energy and enthalpy change of different SODs are obtained. The electrode reaction of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 in different SODs was discussed by the entropy change in different SODs. According to the evolution trend of ΔS, the lithium intercalation reaction of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 may be a single-phase solid solution reaction rather than a two-phase reaction. Finally, the reversible heat generation at different current values and SODs are calculated.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32149239 PMCID: PMC7057695 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) Precycling voltage profiles from the third to tenth cycle; (b) voltage profiles before and after the OCV test for the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li half-cell at 0.1 C, 20 °C.
Figure 2Potentiometric measurement (OCV vs time) for the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li half-cell. (a) 60% SOD; (b) 50% SOD; and (c) 20% SOD. (d) Corresponding linear fitting (OCV vs temperature) at 50% SOD.
Summary of Data for the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li Half-Cell at Different SODs at 20 °C
| SOD (%) | OCV/20 °C | d | Δ | Δ | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.7336 | –0.06 | –6 | –456.79 | –458.548 |
| 10 | 4.7309 | –0.061 | –5.9 | –456.53 | –458.258 |
| 20 | 4.7251 | –0.095 | –9.2 | –455.97 | –458.665 |
| 30 | 4.7248 | –0.123 | –11.8 | –455.94 | –459.397 |
| 40 | 4.7184 | –0.324 | –31.2 | –455.32 | –464.461 |
| 50 | 4.6806 | –0.178 | –17.2 | –451.67 | –456.709 |
| 60 | 4.6742 | –0.168 | –16.2 | –451.06 | –455.806 |
| 70 | 4.6681 | –0.191 | –18.4 | –450.47 | –455.861 |
| 80 | 4.6589 | –0.249 | –24 | –449.58 | –456.612 |
| 85 | 4.4763 | –2.788 | –269 | –431.96 | –510.777 |
| 90 | 4.1264 | –1.297 | –125 | –398.19 | –434.815 |
| 100 | 3.7273 | –0.954 | –92 | –359.68 | –386.636 |
Figure 3Open-circuit voltage vs SOD for the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li half-cell at 20 °C.
Figure 4Entropy-SOD curve of the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li half-cell.
Figure 5(a) ΔG and (b) ΔH vs SOD curves of the LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4/Li half-cell.
Figure 6Reversible heat generation at different current values and SODs.