| Literature DB >> 32149215 |
Aschalew Tadesse1, Mebrahtu Hagos2, Dharmasoth RamaDevi3, Kaloth Basavaiah4, Neway Belachew5.
Abstract
In this study, we report a green and economical hydrothermal synthesis of fluorescent-Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32149215 PMCID: PMC7057337 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Scheme Showing Reaction of Precursors to Produce NCQDs
Figure 1UV–vis absorption (solid black) and fluorescence spectra (blue broken) of (a) NCQDs in daylight and (b) NCQDs under ultraviolet radiation.
Figure 2(a) FL emission spectra of NCQDs at excitation wavelengths from 300 to 410 nm, (b) FL emission spectra of NCQDs at excitation wavelengths from 410 to 490 nm, (c) excitation–emission fluorescence spectra of NCQDs (excitation from 300 to 400 nm and corresponding emission), and (d) excitation and emission contour map of NCQDs.
Comparison of Fluorescence Quantum Yields of CQDs Prepared Using Different Plants
| sl. no. | plant materials as precursor | quantum yield (%) | refs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.9 | ( | |
| 2 | 9 | ( | |
| 3 | fennel seeds | 9.5 | ( |
| 4 | quince fruit | 8.55 | ( |
| 5 | lotus root | 19.0 | ( |
| 6 | ginkgo fruit | 3.33 | ( |
| 7 | carrot juice | 5.16 | ( |
| 8 | unripe | 16 | ( |
| 9 | 19.9 | ( | |
| 10 | citrus lemon juice | 31 | present study |
Figure 3(a) Fluorescence intensity of NCQDs at excitation wavelength of 365 nm indicating the ionic strength of NaCl solution of concentration 0.25–2 M. (b) Stability after irradiation at different times and after preservation for 1 and 3 months. (c) pH effect in acidic media with a pH of 6–2. (d) pH effect in basic media with pH of 8–12.
Figure 4(a, b) Representative TEM and HRTEM (inset) images. (c) SAED of NCQDs and (d) particle size distribution histogram.
Figure 7(a) Fluorescence spectra of NCQDs solution in the presence of different concentrations of Hg2+ and (b) corresponding calibration curve. (c) Fluorescence quenching response of NCQDs to different metal ions with the same concentration (1 μM). (d) Specific FL quenching response of NCQDs to Hg2+ ions in the presence of other cations.
Figure 6(a) XRD peak of NCQDs. (b) FTIR spectrum. (c) Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum (inset elemental composition of NCQDs and FESEM image).
Figure 5Raman spectra of NCQDs.
Scheme 2Scheme Showing Fluorescence Quenching of NCQDs by Hg2+ Ions
Result of Hg2+ Detection in Real Water Samples Using Fluorescent NCQDs
| concentration
of Hg2+(μM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | amount added | amount found | % recovery | %RSD ( |
| tap water 1 | 0.250 | 0.256 | 100.8 | 2.5 |
| tap water 2 | 0.040 | 0.041 | 95.2 | 4.3 |
| packed water 1 | 0.100 | 0.098 | 96.0 | 2.8 |
| packed water 2 | 0.100 | 0.097 | 95.0 | 3.7 |
Figure 8NCQDs Cell Viability Using MTT Assay.
Figure 9(a–d) Fluorescence images of NCQDs labeled MCF7 cells under bright field, 405, 488, and 561 nm excitations, respectively.