| Literature DB >> 32149030 |
Rosa E Rodríguez-Martínez1, Priyadarsi D Roy2, Nuria Torrescano-Valle3, Nancy Cabanillas-Terán3,4, Silvia Carrillo-Domínguez5, Ligia Collado-Vides6, Marta García-Sánchez1,7, Brigitta I van Tussenbroek1.
Abstract
The massive influx of pelagic Sargassum spp. (sargasso) into the Mexican Caribbean Sea has caused major deterioration of the coastal environment and has affected the tourism industry as well as livelihoods since 2015. Species of Sargassum have high capacity to absorb metals; thus, leachates of sargasso may contribute to contamination by potentially toxic metals when they drain into the sea and into the groundwater when dumped in inadequate land deposits. Valorization of sargasso would contribute to sustainable management; therefore, knowledge on potentially toxic metal content is necessary to define possible uses of the algae. We present concentrations of 28 elements measured using a non-destructive X-ray fluorescence analyzer (XRF) in 63 samples of sargasso collected between August 2018 and June 2019 from eight localities along ∼370 km long coastline of the Mexican Caribbean Sea. The sargasso tissues contained detectable concentrations of Al, As, Ca, Cl, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, P, Pb, Rb, S, Si, Sr, Th, U, V, and Zn. The element concentration in sargasso varied on spatial and temporal scales, which likely depended on the previous trajectory of the pelagic masses, and whether these had (or had not) passed through contaminated areas. Total arsenic concentration varied between 24-172 ppm DW, exceeding the maximum limit for seaweed intended as animal fooder (40 ppm DW) in 86% of the samples. For valorization, we recommend analyses of metal contents as a mandatory practice or avoiding uses for nutritional purposes. The high arsenic content is also of concern for environmental contamination of the sea and aquifer. ©2020 Rodríguez-Martínez et al.Entities:
Keywords: Arsenic; Caribbean Sea; Metal content; S. natans; Sargassum fluitans
Year: 2020 PMID: 32149030 PMCID: PMC7049257 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Sampling sites.
Location of the sampling sites of sargasso along the Mexican Caribbean coast between August 2018 and June 2019. Map produced in QGIS 2.18 (http://www.qgis.org) using the following data sources: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (base map, World Vector Shoreline Plus, 2004. http://shoreline.noaa.gov/data/datasheets/wvs.html). The location of survey sites was obtained from the present study. Data sources are open access under the Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0).
Samples information.
Number of samples collected at eight sites along the Mexican Caribbean coast during 2018–2019. Habitat refers to distance from coast, shore (2–20 m from coast) or ocean (>5 km from coast).
| 1 - Contoy Island | Ocean | 2019 | March | 4 | 4 | |||
| 2 - Blue waters | Ocean | 2018 | August | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3 - Puerto Morelos | Shore | 2018 | August | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| September | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| October | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||||
| December | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 2019 | February | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |||
| March | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| April | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 4 - Cozumel | Ocean | 2018 | August | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2019 | May | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
| 5 - Mahahual | Shore | 2019 | May | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||
| 6 - Chinchorro | Shore | 2019 | May | 1 | 1 | |||
| 7 - Xahuayxol | Shore | 2019 | April | 1 | 2 | |||
| May | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| June | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| 8 - Xcalak | Shore | 2019 | May | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||
Notes.
Sarg sp: Sargassum spp., Sflu III: Sargassum fluitans III, Snat I: S. natans I, Snat VIII: S. natans VIII.
Element concentrations median and range.
Element concentrations (ppm DW) of pelagic Sargassum spp. tissue collected from eight localities along the Mexican Caribbean coast between 2018 and 2019. The number of samples with readings above LOD are expressed in % of the total sample size (n = 63).
| Al | 140 | 58.7 | <LOD | 500 | 206 |
| As | 4 | 100 | 24 | 172 | 80 |
| Ca | 394 | 100 | 23,723 | 136,146 | 70,040 |
| Cl | 266 | 100 | 747 | 53,101 | 22,350 |
| Cu | 6 | 7.9 | <LOD | 540 | <LOD |
| Fe | 3 | 7.9 | <LOD | 11 | <LOD |
| K | 333 | 100 | 1,990 | 46,002 | 19,666 |
| Mg | 2,915 | 92.1 | <LOD | 13,662 | 6,537 |
| Mn | 13 | 100 | 40 | 139 | 71 |
| Mo | 1 | 7.9 | <LOD | 7 | <LOD |
| P | 145 | 100 | 228 | 401 | 327 |
| Pb | 2 | 7.9 | <LOD | 3 | <LOD |
| Rb | 1 | 100 | 30 | 143 | 56 |
| S | 199 | 100 | 9,462 | 24,773 | 14,363 |
| Si | 342 | 100 | 447 | 2,922 | 1,767 |
| Sr | 6 | 100 | 1,605 | 2,564 | 1,890 |
| Th | 1 | 100 | 5 | 23 | 10 |
| U | 4 | 100 | 11 | 48 | 23 |
| V | 3 | 28.6 | <LOD | 13 | <LOD |
| Zn | 5 | 12.7 | <LOD | 17 | <LOD |
Notes.
LOD, Limit of detection.
Figure 2Spatial variability in element concentrations.
Concentration of fourteen most frequent elements (ppm algal DW) in tissues of sargasso collected at eight sites along the Mexican Caribbean coast in 2018–2019. Note differences in scale of the Y-axis. Each dot corresponds to the median of the five XRF readings per sample. Color of the dot represents the sargasso species/morphotype. The horizontal black lines correspond to the median for each site. The dotted blue line corresponds to the limit of detection of the XRF equipment. A, Aluminum; B, Arsenic; C, Calcium; D, Chlorine; E, Potassium; F, Magnesium; G, Manganese; H, Phosphorus; I, Rubidium; J, Sulphur; K, Silicon; L, Strontium; M, Thorium; N, Uranium. Figure 1 and Table 1 have the site and sample details.
Elements concentrations in sargasso morphotypes.
Median and range (in parenthesis) of elements (ppm DW) in three sargasso species/morphotypes collected from eight localities along the Mexican Caribbean coast in 2018–2019. P values show summary of statistical analyses using Kruskal–Wallis H test (bold if significant) and the last column shows results of multiple comparison test.
| a) | b) | c) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 221 | 198 | <LOD | 0.7341 | |
| As | 59 | 55 | 123 | c >b | |
| Ca | 76,727 | 81,965 | 43,289 | (a = b) >c | |
| Cl | 21,487 | 10,122 | 32,086 | c >b | |
| K | 19,466 | 14,309 | 32,900 | c >b | |
| Mg | 6,376 | 6,385 | 6,883 | 0.5990 | |
| Mn | 70 | 89 | 56 | b >(a = c) | |
| P | 336 | 328 | 300 | 0.0590 | |
| Rb | 60 | 51 | 67 | c >b | |
| S | 14,341 | 12,776 | 16,231 | 0.1370 | |
| Si | 1,861 | 2,095 | 1,049 | (a = b) >c | |
| Sr | 1,934 | 1,876 | 1,793 | 0.4375 | |
| Th | 10 | 8 | 9 | 0.3021 | |
| U | 22 | 23 | 27 | 0.2321 |
Notes.
LOD, limit of detection.
Figure 3Temporal variability in element concentrations.
Variability in concentration of fourteen different elements (ppm DW) in sargasso collected at Puerto Morelos between August 2018 and April 2019. Z-score transformations were applied to values of each element across all the sampling periods and their intensities above and below the mean are represented on the heatmap by red and yellow colors, respectively, as shown on the color key bar.
Element concentrations in different studies.
Comparison of element concentration in sargasso from the Mexican Caribbean coast and other studies in different parts of the world.
| Nigeria | Dominican Republic | Ghana | Mexican Caribbean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 303–4,188 | <140–517 | ||
| As | 14–42 | 13–54 | 24–172 | |
| Ba | 7–17 | <36 | ||
| Ca | 96,901–133,400 | 23,723–136,146 | ||
| Cd | 0.1–0.3 | 78–119 | <2 | |
| Cl | 61–1353 | 747–53,101 | ||
| Co | 0.4–1 | <11 | ||
| Cr | 2–56 | <8 | ||
| Cu | 2–12 | 24–36 | <6–540 | |
| Fe | 8,700 ± 280 | 20–655 | 1,209–5,910 | <3–11 |
| K | 28,000 ± 740 | 2,208–33,602 | 1,990–46,002 | |
| Mg | 42,750 ± 3,500 | 10,211–18,241 | <2915–13,662 | |
| Mn | 16–32 | 40–139 | ||
| Mo | 0.6–3 | <1–7 | ||
| Ni | 10–33 | <10 | ||
| P | 96,500 ± 21,200 | 761–1,145 | 228–401 | |
| Pb | 1–2 | 105–335 | <2–3 | |
| Rb | 0.3–10 | 30–143 | ||
| Si | 23,883–55,776 | 447–2,922 | ||
| Sr | 1,162–1,437 | 1,605–2,564 | ||
| Th | 0.04–0.4 | 5–23 | ||
| Ti | 37–92 | <29 | ||
| U | 0.2–0.7 | 11–48 | ||
| V | 1–3 | <3–13 | ||
| Y | 40 ± 0.0 | 0.1–0.8 | <1 | |
| Zn | 50 ± 0.0 | 13–21 | 16–100 | <5–17 |
| Zr | 8–34 | <2 |
Notes.
Oyesiku & Egunyomi, 2014 (mean and SD).
Fernández et al., 2017 (range).
Addico & De Graft-Johnson, 2016 (range).
This study (range).