| Literature DB >> 32148947 |
Martin Stattin1,2, Stefan Hagen1,2, Daniel Ahmed1,2, Eva Smretschnig1,2, Florian Frommlet3, Katharina Krepler1,2, Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei1,2,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate normalized short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) imaging changes over time as a predictive parameter for the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) function in eyes compromised by acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) after indocyanine green angiography-guided verteporfin (Visudyne®, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) photodynamic therapy (PDT) with a half-fluence rate (25 J/cm2).Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32148947 PMCID: PMC7049425 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8491712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Figure 1Diagnostic and therapeutic protocol of a left eye with acute CSCR. (a) Late fluorescence angiography with juxta foveal late leakage and a smokestack sign. Below, a spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) slab with subfoveal fluid accumulation corresponding to the bar in the en face image. (b) Midphase indocyanine green angiography showing a 1500 μm laser spot centered at the hyperpermeability. SD-OCT segment through the treatment area with flat pigment epithelial detachment (PED) (arrow). (c) Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) of the same lesion 1 month after treatment with a ring of hyperfluorescence (arrows) demarcating the borders of subretinal fluid extension and two measurement rings encircling the fovea in a 350 μm (SW-350) and 1200 μm (SW-1200) diameter. The short-wavelength (SW) FAF grey values (GV) of both encircled areas were normalized by dividing them through the SW-FAF GV of the complete picture. Resolution of subretinal fluid is visible on the SD-OCT B-scan. (d) The same eye 77 months after treatment with both measurement rings encircling homogenous FAF demonstrating minor hypofluorescent remnants nasal to the fovea (arrow) corresponding to a hyperreflective PED in SD-OCT.
Data of patients treated with half-fluence PDT for unilateral acute CSCR.
|
| Gender | Age | Laterality | Spot | Follow-upa | BCVAb | BCVAc | SW-350d | SW-350c | SW-1200d | SW-1200c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | m | 43 | OD | 2000 | 89 | 0.96 | 1.16 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.9 | 0.76 |
| OS | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.96 | 0.77 | |||||||
| 2 | f | 44 | OD | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.43 | ||||
| OS | 2600 | 88 | 0.96 | 1.18 | 0.53 | 0.26 | 0.54 | 0.43 | |||
| 3 | f | 49 | OD | 1500 | 85 | 0.80 | 1.30 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.52 |
| OS | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.65 | 0.42 | |||||||
| 4 | f | 42 | OD | 1600 | 84 | 1.02 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.63 |
| 5 | m | 43 | OD | 1900 | 85 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.79 |
| OS | 0.4 | 0.32 | 0.63 | 0.52 | |||||||
| 6 | m | 57 | OD | 1900 | 83 | 0.50 | 0.88 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.58 | 0.36 |
| 7 | m | 46 | OD | 2500 | 83 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.17 | 0.98 |
| OS | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.95 | |||||||
| 8 | m | 44 | OD | 1500 | 84 | 1.08 | 1.16 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.56 |
| OS | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.72 | 0.72 | |||||||
| 9 | m | 41 | OD | 1500 | 83 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.78 | 0.51 |
| OS | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.84 | 0.69 | |||||||
| 10 | m | 52 | OD | 2100 | 80 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| OS | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.67 | |||||||
| 11 | f | 67 | OD | 0.69 | 0.34 | 0.69 | 0.61 | ||||
| OS | 1500 | 77 | 0.62 | 1.18 | 0.51 | 0.33 | 0.83 | 0.58 |
PDT = photodynamic therapy; CSCR = central serous chorioretinopathy; n = patient number; spot = spot size in μm; a = in months; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity in letters ETDRS; ETDRS = the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale; b = before treatment; c = at follow-up; SW-350/-1200 = normalized short wavelength fundus autofluorescence grey values for 350 μm and 1200 μm; d = one month after treatment; m = male; f = female; OD = oculus dexter; OS = oculus sinister.
Figure 2Distribution of normalized short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence grey values (SW-FAF GV). (a) Differences of SW-FAF GV for a 350 μm (SW-350) diameter circle centered at the fovea 1 month vs. 83 months after half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT). (b) Differences of SW-FAF GV for a 1200 μm (SW-1200) diameter circle centered at the fovea 1 month vs. 83 months after half-fluence PDT. (c) Differences of SW-350 of the contralateral eye 1 month vs. 83 months. (d) Differences of SW-1200 of the contralateral eye 1 month vs. 83 months.