| Literature DB >> 32148835 |
Beilin Zhang1, Jinpeng Wang2, Qiyan Wei3, Yi Liu4, Huiwen Zhang4, Xiaohui Chen2, Kun Xu4.
Abstract
Epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (EGCG) exists as one of the major active components of green tea and has been studied extensively; however, the relationship between EGCG and the changes in the gut microflora of ovariectomized (OVX) rats as a model of menopause women have not yet been studied. Female Wistar rats were fed on a maintenance material diet and underwent either ovariectomy or SHAM surgery. The ovariectomized rats were divided into OVX group with the treatment of placebo or EGCG group which was treated with EGCG by oral gavage. After 8 weeks of treatment, anxiety-like behaviors were assessed using elevated plus maze test (EMP) and open field test (OFT). The serum estradiol concentration was assayed through ELISA. High-throughput V3-V4 16S rDNA sequencing was conducted to assess the microbial diversity in fecal samples collected from all rats. EGCG, at a concentration of 10 mg/kg, caused behavioral changes in rats similar to anxiety. In EPM, OVX rats spent less time in open arms than SHAM group rats and EGCG group rats (F = 16.043, p < .01). In OFT, the total travelled distance and the number of entries for EGCG group were higher compared with OVX group (F = 30.939, H = 13.107, respectively; p < .01). In addition, the distribution and composition of intestinal microflora in rats changed after ovariectomy. EGCG modulated the diversity of gut microbiota in OVX group at the phylum and the genus levels. Our results suggested that the composition of gut microbiota and anxiety in OVX rats were simultaneously affected by EGCG, and therefore, the two conditions might be strongly related, yet the deeper mechanistic links need further exploration.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; antianxiety effect; intestinal microbiota; ovariectomized rat
Year: 2020 PMID: 32148835 PMCID: PMC7020287 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1The effect of EGCG on serum estradiol level as the result of 8‐week treatment. *p < .01, compared with SHAM group
Figure 2Anxiety‐like behaviors in EPM. 2A shows open arm time duration(s) for the three groups. EGCG treatment ameliorated the anxiety‐like symptom compared with OVX group (one‐way ANOVA with LSD). 2B shows EGCG treatment decreased center zone stay of OVX animals compared with SHAM group and EGCG group (one‐way ANOVA with LSD). 2C shows that the frequency of entries in open arms in EPM apparatus was significantly increased in EGCG group compared with OVX group (Rank test). *p < .05, **p < .01, compared with SHAM group; #p < .05, compared with OVX group
Total EPM: open arm time, center zone duration, and frequency of open arm of three groups
| Group |
| EPM:open arm time(s) | Center zone duration(s) | Frequency of open arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAM | 6 | 45.93 ± 21.30 | 113.13 ± 28.29 | 4.50 ± 1.52 |
| OVX | 6 | 3.27 ± 3.82 | 10.37 ± 8.12 | 1.00 ± 1.09 |
| EGCG | 6 | 19.90 ± 7.14 | 41.60 ± 18.71 | 2.00 ± 0.89 |
p < .05, **p < .01 compared with SHAM group; #p < .05, compared with OVX group. Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 6 in all group).
Total travelled distance, velocity, and number of entries in center of three groups
| Group | Total travelled distance(cm) | Velocity | Number of entries in center |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAM | 2,732.27 ± 253.97 | 9.11 ± 0.85 | 2.83 ± 1.72 |
| OVX | 572.21 ± 338.74 | 1.91 ± 1.13 | 0.16 ± 0.41 |
| EGCG | 1709.19 ± 707.23 | 5.70 ± 2.36 | 1.17 ± 0.41 |
p < .05, **p < .01 compared with SHAM group; #p < .05, compared with OVX group. Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 6 in all group).
Figure 3The effects of EGCG on the observations during OFT. 3A showed that the total travelled distance in EGCG group increased compared with OVX (p < .05, one‐way ANOVA with LSD). 3B showed that velocity of OVX group rats decreased compared with SHAM group (p < .01). 3C showed that frequency in center zone was less for OVX group rats compared with SHAM (p < .01, one‐way ANOVA with LSD) and EGCG group (p < .05, one‐way ANOVA with LSD). *p < .05, **p < .01, compared with SHAM group; #p < .05, compared with OVX group
Figure 4The distribution of OTUs for the three groups after 8‐week treatment of EGCG
Estimation of diversity within fecal samples from the three groups
| Group | sobs | Chao | Ace | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAM | 798 | 894 | 890 | 5 | 0.018 |
| OVX | 736 | 848 | 845 | 4.42 | 0.044 |
| EGCG | 757 | 869 | 858 | 4.93 | 0.021 |
Figure 5PCA plot of microbial communities from 16 fecal samples. PCA denotes principal component analysis. The percentages of variation in terms of principal components were showed on the axes. Red denotes SHAM group, green denotes OVX group, and blue denotes EGCG group
Differential gut microbiota at the phylum level
| Taxa | SHAM | OVX | EGCG |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteria | 0.16 ± 0.08 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | .038 |
| Firmicutes | 50.35 ± 9.5 | 38.32 ± 6.99 | 57.04 ± 6.95 | .017 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.31 ± 0.533 | 5.85 ± 3.81 | 0.45 ± 0.68 | .0076 |
Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 6 in SHAM group, n = 6 in OVX group, n = 4 in EGCG group).
Differential gut microbiota at the genus level
| Taxa | SHAM | OVX | EGCG |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akkermansia | 0.31 ± 0.53 | 5.85 ± 3.81 | 0.45 ± 0.68 | .007 |
| Anaerotruncus | 0.0013 ± 0.0018 | 0.0047 ± 0.0034 | 0.007 ± 0.0035 | .02 |
| Anaerovibrio | 0.09 ± 0.21 | 0.004 ± 0.008 | 0.006 ± 0.01 | .03 |
| Bacteroides | 5.72 ± 3.83 | 1.87 ± 0.49 | 2.01 ± 0.48 | .009 |
| Butyricimonas | 0.011 ± 0.006 | 0.006 ± 0.004 | 0.003 ± 0.001 | .03 |
| Escherichia | 0.006 ± 0.007 | 0.124 ± 0.139 | 0.007 ± 0.007 | .035 |
| Phascolarctobacterium | 0.663 ± 1.654 | 0.95 ± 0.37 | 0.512 ± 0.413 | .049 |
| Prevotella | 11.31 ± 11.65 | 26.76 ± 12.88 | 9.8 ± 3.87 | .02 |
| Rothia | 0.036 ± 0.027 | 0.007 ± 0.005 | 0.045 ± 0.019 | .02 |
| Veillonella | 0.0136 ± 0.012 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.09 ± 0.08 | .01 |
| vadinCA11 | 0.006 ± 0.009 | 0.0004 ± 0.0009 | 0.013 ± 0.02 | .047 |
Data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 6 in SHAM group, n = 6 in OVX group n = 4 in EGCG group).