| Literature DB >> 32148796 |
Seyed Mehdi Hosseini1, Sajad Rostami1, Bahram Hosseinzadeh Samani1, Zahra Lorigooini2.
Abstract
One of the nonthermal methods is the atmospheric pressure cold plasma (APCP). In this study, the effect of cold plasma on the reduction of Escherichia coli bacteria and qualitative properties of sour cherry juice, including total phenolic content (TPC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), and vitamin C, were investigated. Independent variables included plasma exposure time (1, 5, and 9 min), applied field intensity (25, 37.5, and 50 kV/cm), feeding gas oxygen content (0%, 0.5%, and 1%), and sample depth (0.5, 1, and 1.5 cm). The results show that increased oxygen content in argon has the greatest effect on the reduction of bacteria, and plasma exposure decreased 6 logarithmic periods of E. coli bacteria in sour cherry juice. Optimization results showed when all bacteria were eliminated by plasma, TPC remained unchanged, and TAC and vitamin C decreased by 4% and 21%, respectively, while thermal methods increased TPC by 23% and decreased TAC and vitamin C by 26% and 77%, respectively. These results indicate that, compared with conventional thermal methods, sour cherry juice pasteurization using APCP has little effect on the juice qualitative properties, and this method can serve as a suitable alternative to conventional thermal methods.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; cold plasma; nonthermal method; response surface method; sour cherry juice
Year: 2020 PMID: 32148796 PMCID: PMC7020306 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1The schematic illustration of the plasma generation system
Levels of independent variables selected for the design of experiments
| Independent variable | Range of level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Plasma exposure Time (min) | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| Field strength (kV/cm) | 25 | 37.5 | 50 |
| Depth (cm) | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Oxygen in argon (%) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 |
Figure 2Comparison of the emission spectrum of APCP from (a) argon (b) 99.5% argon and 0.5% oxygen and (c) 99% argon and 1% oxygen
Figure 3Changes in the temperature and pH in tests
The analysis of variance results for the effects of plasma exposure time, depth of samples, field strength, and oxygen percentage in argon on the inactivation of Escherichia coli bacteria in sour cherry juice
| Source |
| Sum of squares | Mean square |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 14 | 62.99 | 4.50 |
| Time (min) | 1 | 4.27 | 4.27 |
| Depth (cm) | 1 | 2.98 | 2.98 |
| Field strength (kV/cm) | 1 | 7.55 | 7.55 |
| Oxygen in argon (%) | 1 | 42.57 | 42.57 |
| Time × depth | 1 | 0.038 | 0.038ns |
| Time × field strength | 1 | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| Time × oxygen in argon | 1 | 0.52 | 0.52 |
| Depth × field strength | 1 | 3.630E‐003 | 3.630E‐003ns |
| Depth × oxygen in argon | 1 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| Field strength × oxygen in argon | 1 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Time2 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.17ns |
| Depth2 | 1 | 0.058 | 0.058 ns |
| Field strength2 | 1 | 0.35 | 0.35ns |
| Oxygen in argon2 | 1 | 0.089 | 0.089ns |
| Residual | 15 | 0.90 | 0.060 |
| Lack of fit | 10 | 0.74 | 0.074ns |
| Pure error | 5 | 0.16 | 0.032 |
| Cor total | 29 | 63.89 |
nsNot significant.
Significant effect at 1% level.
Figure 4Verification of the actual data versus the data obtained from the model
Figure 5Effects of plasma exposure time, field strength, oxygen percentage in argon, and depth of samples on inactivation of Escherichia coli bacteria in sour cherry juice
The analysis of variance results for the effect of ACPC on qualitative properties (TPC, TAC and vitamin C) in sour cherry juice
| Source |
| TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | TA (mg C3GE/L) | Vitamin C (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of squares | Mean square | Sum of squares | Mean square | Sum of squares | Mean square | ||
| Model | 14 | 20.25 | 1.45ns | 211.69 | 15.12 | 140.02 | 10.00 |
| Time (min) | 1 | 3.19 | 3.19ns | 38.49 | 38.49 | 18.83 | 18.83 |
| Depth (cm) | 1 | 1.21 | 1.21ns | 16.59 | 16.59 | 7.75 | 7.75 |
| Field strength (kV/cm) | 1 | 0.88 | 0.88ns | 34.72 | 34.72 | 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Oxygen in argon (%) | 1 | 1.03 | 1.03ns | 83.21 | 83.21 | 90.63 | 90.63 |
| Time × depth | 1 | 1.12 | 1.12ns | 2.250E‐004 | 2.25E‐004ns | 0.56 | 0.56ns |
| Time × field strength | 1 | 2.85 | 2.85ns | 4.54 | 4.54 | 0.32 | 0.32ns |
| Time × oxygen in argon | 1 | 0.24 | 0.24ns | 0.32 | 0.32ns | 0.69 | 0.69ns |
| Depth × field strength | 1 | 0.077 | 0.077ns | 0.14 | 0.14ns | 0.89 | 0.89ns |
| Depth × oxygen in argon | 1 | 0.079 | 0.079ns | 0.79 | 0.79ns | 0.074 | 0.074ns |
| Field strength × oxygen in argon | 1 | 3.02 | 3.02ns | 0.018 | 0.018ns | 2.162E‐003 | 2.162E‐003ns |
| Time2 | 1 | 1.57 | 1.57ns | 0.063 | 0.063ns | 0.13 | 0.13ns |
| Depth2 | 1 | 0.012 | 0.012ns | 1.89 | 1.89ns | 1.28 | 1.28ns |
| Field strength2 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.71ns | 0.11 | 0.11ns | 0.20 | 0.20ns |
| Oxygen in argon2 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.53ns | 5.03 | 5.03 | 0.46 | 0.46ns |
| Residual | 15 | 10.23 | 0.68 | 7.28 | 0.49 | 3.96 | 0.26 |
| Lack of fit | 10 | 7.21 | 0.72ns | 5.03 | 0.50ns | 2.44 | 0.24ns |
| Pure error | 5 | 3.02 | 0.60 | 2.25 | 0.45 | 1.52 | 0.30 |
| Cor total | 29 | 30.48 | 218.97 | 143.98 | |||
nsNot significant.
Significant Effect at 1% level.
Figure 6(a) The effect of field intensity and plasma exposure time, and (b) the effect of samples depth and oxygen content in argon on TAC in sour cherry juice
Figure 7(a) The effect of oxygen percentage in argon, field intensity, and (b) the effect of the depth of samples and plasma exposure time on vitamin C range in sour cherry juice
Boundary conditions used for the optimization
| Name | Goal (State 1) | Goal (State 2) | Lower limit | Upper limit | Lower weight | Upper weight | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (min) | In range | In range | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Depth (cm) | In range | In range | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Field strength (kV/cm) | In range | In range | 25 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Oxygen in argon (%) | In range | In range | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Log ( | Minimize | Minimize | −5.994 | −0.222 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | In range | Maximize | 273.02 | 276.23 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| TAC (mg C3GE/L) | In range | Maximize | 229.80 | 240.70 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Vitamin C (mg/L) | In range | Maximize | 37.92 | 45.79 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Optimization results using the RSM method
| Sour cherry juice samples | Results | Variation rather than untreated samples | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TAC | TPC | Vitamin C |
| TAC | TPC | Vitamin C | |
| Untreated | 5.994 | 241.20 ± 1.3a | 277.05 ± 1.20b | 36.03 ± 1.24a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thermal treated | 0 | 171.5 ± 0.49d | 359.75 ± 2.07a | 8.23 ± 0.32c | 100% (↓) | 26% (↓) | 23% (↑) | 77% (↓) |
| Plasma treated | ||||||||
| State 1 | 0 | 230.52 ± 1.12c | 275.04 ± 2.27b | 28.29 ± 1.06b | 100% (↓) | 4% (↓) | 0 | 21% (↓) |
| Plasma treated | ||||||||
| State 2 | 2.25 | 238.87 ± 1.19b | 274.98 ± 2.97b | 34.12 ± 1.25a | 38% (↓) | 0% | 0 | 5% (↓) |
Escherichia coli is expressed in terms of (CFU/ml), TAC in terms of (mg C3GE/L), TPC in terms of mg GAE/100 g, and vitamin C in terms of (mg/L). Different letters showed significant differences at 5% Duncan test.