Literature DB >> 32148440

Interleukin-22 Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum-Infected Malaria Patients.

Nada H Aljarba1, Mashael R Al-Anazi2, Mohammed I Shafeai3, Fuad H Rudiny3, Saad M Bin Dajem4, Hani Alothaid5, Majid Darraj6, Saad Alkahtani7, Jahad Alghamdi8, Mohammed N Al-Ahdal2,9, Ahmed A Al-Qahtani2,9.   

Abstract

Background and Objectives. Malaria infection, caused by Plasmodium falciparum, is the most lethal and frequently culminates in severe clinical complications. Interleukin-22 (IL-22) has been implicated in several diseases including malaria. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of IL-22 gene polymorphisms in P. falciparum infection. Material and Methods. Ten single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs976748, rs1179246, rs2046068, rs1182844, rs2227508, rs2227513, rs2227478, rs2227481, rs2227491, and rs2227483, of IL-22 gene were genotyped through PCR-based assays of 250 P. falciparum infection. IL-22 gene promoter activity.
RESULTS: We found that the rs2227481 TT genotype (odds ratio 0.254, confidence interval = 0.097-0.663, P. P. falciparum infection. P. P. P. P.
CONCLUSION: The study suggests that IL-22 polymorphisms in rs2227481 and rs2227483 could contribute to protection against P. falciparum infection. IL-22 gene promoter activity.
Copyright © 2020 Nada H. Aljarba et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32148440      PMCID: PMC7049855          DOI: 10.1155/2020/5193723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mediators Inflamm        ISSN: 0962-9351            Impact factor:   4.711


1. Introduction

Malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in humans [1]. It affects 5% of individuals with severe malaria and often culminates in severe clinical complications including severe malarial anemia (SMA), hemoglobinuria, and cerebral malaria (CM) [2]. Malaria is considered a global health threat, with rapidly increasing numbers affecting over 100 nations and more than 219 million people globally. It is estimated that almost 50% of the global population is susceptible to malaria and nearly 1 million individuals die annually from the infection [3]. Saudi Arabia is one of the largest countries in the Middle East with a population of over 32 million. The implementation of malaria control measures in Saudi Arabia over the past 50 years, in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), has effectively reduced the magnitude of risk throughout the nation [4-6]. In 2016, Saudi Arabia was included in the “Eliminating Countries for 2020 (E-2020)” initiative of the WHO to achieve the goal of a malaria-free country by 2020 [3]. According to the WHO country profile (2017), there are currently 64 active foci of malaria in Saudi Arabia. The number of individuals living in the active foci is 173,000 (1%) with the majority (32.8 million (99%)), living in malaria-free areas. The predominant Plasmodium species causing the majority of the malaria cases is P. falciparum (97%) followed by P. vivax (2%). It is known that the host genetic polymorphisms play an important role in the variation of malaria severity associated with P. falciparum infection. Also known is the fact that malaria parasites have a robust selective pressure on human genetics, particularly in regions where malaria is endemic [7, 8]. Various disease phenotypes caused by P. falciparumare influenced by host genetic factors and assist in establishing the pathological mechanisms underlying the vulnerability to the infection [9]. For example, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) gene are associated with an increase in SMA in P. falciparum-infected patients [10]. SNPs in the TNFα gene have been shown to increase the susceptibility to severe malaria [11]. Interleukin-22 (IL-22) has been classified as a cytokine of the IL-20 subfamily. The IL-22 gene is positioned at chromosome 12q15. Both innate and adaptive arms of the immune system produce IL-22, including αβ T, γδ T, NKT, and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Certain nonhematopoietic and myeloid cells can also release IL-22 [12]. IL-22 affects the outcome of several diseases, such as multiple sclerosis [13], psoriasis [14], inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [14], Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) [15], and West Nile encephalitis [16]. Polymorphisms in the IL-22 gene are associated with several diseases such as ulcerative colitis (UC) [17], psoriasis vulgaris [18], bladder cancer [19], and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [20]. It has been suggested that the variations contribute to malaria pathogenesis. Koch et al. found an association between a IL-22 polymorphism and vulnerability to CM, with other variations associated with protection [21] and an IL-22 polymorphism, namely rs2227473, was associated with childhood CM pathogenesis [22]. In experimental P. chabaudi malaria infection in mice, a higher production of IL-22 was observed in the liver, which is important as it suggests that this cytokine is an essential factor in the protection against the lethal infection caused by P. chabaudi [23]. Such a finding could suggest an important role for IL-22 in P. falciparum-associated malaria and pathogenesis. Therefore, this report investigates the plausible role of variations at the IL-22 gene in the complications associated with P. falciparum infection in a Saudi Arabian population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Venous blood was collected from 250 P. falciparum-infected patients admitted to the Malaria Center in the Jazan region, located in the southwest of Saudi Arabia. The study also included 200 randomly selected uninfected healthy individuals as a control group. A thick blood film from each infected patient was used to determine the parasite density according to the “plus system” scale, described in the WHO manual [24]. Based on the parasite density, patients were categorized in four groups: Group I: 1-10 parasites per 100 thick film fields, Group II: 11-100 parasites per 100 thick film fields, Group III: 1-10 parasites per single thick film field, and Group IV: more than 10 parasites per single thick film field.

2.2. Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at King Fahad Hospital (KFCH), Jazan (Registry number 041) and conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Informed consent were obtained from all participants prior to their participation in the study; consent for children were given by their legal guardians. To ensure confidentiality, patient data and biological samples were anonymized prior to processing by laboratory staff. Basic demographic and clinical data required to accomplish the objectives of this study were collected and securely retained for all study participants.

2.3. SNP Selection and Genotyping

A total of ten SNPs within the IL-22 gene region were selected for genotyping. The IL-22 SNPs included were rs976748, rs1179246, rs2046068, rs1182844, rs2227508, rs2227513, rs2227478, rs2227481, rs2227491, and rs2227483. Candidate SNPs were selected based on the following criteria: (i) a minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 5%, as reported by the 1000 genome for the combined populations and (ii) a linkage disequilibrium (LD) threshold (r2) ≤ 0.8 or (iii) existence of evidence for an association with malaria. Marker information of the SNPs selected is shown in Supplementary . Genotyping the SNPs was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based direct DNA sequencing. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol and stored at -20°C for further experimentation. The PCR was performed using the GoTaq Green Master Mix PCR (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Primers flanking SNPs of interest were designed using Primer3 Input (version 0.4.0) (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). All primers were tailed with an M13 sequence to facilitate the sequencing of the PCR products. Sequences of the primers and PCR conditions used for each SNP are shown in Supplementary . The PCR products were detected by 2% gel electrophoresis to ensure the quality of the PCR products. The amplification products were subjected to direct sequencing using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each PCR product was sequenced in the forward and reverse directions. The sequences were analyzed and edited with the SeqMan Pro 15 Lasergene (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA).

2.4. Luciferase Reporter Assays to Monitor the Activity of Gene Expression on IL-22 Promotor

Gene fragments of the promoter region containing IL-22 rs2227513 A/G variants were amplified and cloned in the pGL3 Basic Vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Primers were tailed at the 5′ end with specifying endonuclease recognition sites for the restriction enzymes SmaI and BglII (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). In addition, a few overhang sequences (CGCCTA) were added to facilitate restriction enzyme binding. Primers used for the amplification of the promoter region, PCR conditions, and chromosomal locations are shown in Supplementary . PCR amplification for cloning was conducted using the HotStar DNA Polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer's protocol. Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells were used for colony selection on ampicillin plates. Clones were selected and DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Extracted plasmids with cloned fragments were transfected into HEK293 cells (Human Embryonic Kidney 293 cells), which were harvested and tested for luciferase activity after 48 hours.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The SNPs were analyzed and measures of LD, haplotype frequencies, and MAFs were calculated using the Haploview software (version 4.0) (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA). The de Finetti program (http://ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl) was used to conduct a genotypic association test for all the selected variants as the primary test of association. We also performed the allelic, dominant, and recessive model for each variant to explore the possibility of other models of inheritance. The results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Testing of deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was performed; rs2227513 was excluded from further analyses due to the significant deviation from HWE (P value < 0.05). The test of association was considered significant if the P value, obtained in a two-tailed test, was <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. The Association of the IL-22 Genotype and Allele Distribution and Risk of P. falciparum Malaria

The genotype distribution of the SNPs in the IL-22 gene between the P. falciparum-infected group and control group was investigated. The frequency of the TT genotype of rs2227481 was significantly higher in the control group compared to the malaria group (8.5% versus 2.4%, OR = 0.254; 95% CI 0.097-0.663, χ2 = 8.9, and P = 0.002) (Table 1). In addition, the T allele at variant rs2227481 was statistically higher in the control compared to the malaria group (allele frequency 22.7% versus 16.2%, OR = 0.656; 95% CI 0.470-0.916, χ2 = 6.17, and P = 0.013). We also found that the T allele was associated with a lower risk of P. falciparum malaria in a recessive model (OR = 0.265; 95% CI 0.102–0.685, χ2 = 8.52, and P = 0.003). For IL-22 variant rs2227483, we identified that the heterozygous AT genotype frequency was significantly higher in the control group in comparison to the patient group (genotype frequency 13% versus 5.2%, OR = 0.375; 95% CI 0.187-0.754, χ2 = 8.05, and P = 0.004).
Table 1

Genotype distribution and allele frequency of IL-22 SNPs among malaria patients compared to healthy control subjects.

SNPsGenotype/allele distributionControlPatientsOR (95% CI) χ 2 P value
rs976748TT193 (96.5%)236 (94.4%)Ref
CT6 (3%)13 (5.2%)1.772 (0.661-4.749)1.330.249
CC1 (0.5%)1 (0.4%)0.818 (0.051-13.160)0.020.886
T392 (98%)485 (97%)1.515 (0.636-3.611)0.890.344
C8 (2%)15 (3%)
CC+CT vs. TT1.636 (0.647-4.133)1.10.293
CC vs. CT+TT1.251 (0.078-20.130)0.030.874

rs1179246CC55 (27.5%)86 (34.4%)Ref
AC98 (49%)112 (44.8%)0.731 (0.474-1.128)2.010.155
AA47 (23.5%)52 (20.8%)0.708 (0.421-1.190)1.710.191
C208 (52%)284 (56.8%)0.824 (0.633-1.073)2.070.150
A192 (48%)216 (43.2%)
AA+AC vs. CC0.723 (0.482-1.085)2.460.116
AA vs. AC+CC0.855 (0.547-1.338)0.470.492

rs2046068AA104 (52%)114 (45.6%)Ref
AC76 (38%)111 (44.4%)1.332 (0.898-1.977)2.030.153
CC20 (10%)25 (10%)1.140 (0.598-2.174)0.160.689
A284 (71%)339 (67.8%)1.163 (0.873-1.548)1.070.301
C116 (29%)161 (32.2%)
CC+AC vs. AA1.292 (0.890-1.876)1.820.177
CC vs. AC+AA1.000 (0.538-1.859)01

rs1182844TT83 (41.5%)90 (36%)Ref
AT95 (47.5%)120 (48%)1.165 (0.779-1.741)0.550.456
AA22 (11%)40 (16%)1.677 (0.921-3.054)2.880.089
T261 (65.3%)300 (60%)1.252 (0.953-1.644)2.610.106
A139 (34.5%)200 (40%)
AA+AT vs. TT1.261 (0.861-1.848)1.420.233
AA vs. AT+TT1.541 (0.883-2.690)2.340.126

rs2227508AA140 (70)166 (66.4%)Ref
AT56 (28)71 (28.4%)1.069 (0.705-1.621)0.10.752
TT4 (2)13 (5.2%)2.741 (0.874-8.596)3.220.072
A336 (84)403 (80.6%)1.264 (0.893-1.788)1.750.186
T64 (16)97 (19.4%)
TT+AT vs. AA1.181 (0.791-1.762)0.660.415
TT vs. AT+AA2.333 (0.750-7.264)3.130.076

rs2227478TT84 (42%)100 (40%)Ref
CT82 (41%)115 (46%)1.178 (0.785-1.767)0.630.428
CC34 (17%)35 (14%)0.865 (0.497-1.505)0.260.606
T250 (62.5%)315 (63%)0.979 (0.746-1.285)0.020.877
C150 (37.5%)185 (37%)
CC+CT vs. TT1.086 (0.744-1.585)0.180.668
CC vs. CT+TT0.795 (0.476-1.328)0.770.380

rs2227481CC126 (63%)175 (70%)Ref
CT57 (28.5%)69 (27.6%)0.872 (0.573-1.325)0.410.520
TT17 (8.5%)6 (2.4%)0.254(0.097-0.663)8.90.002
C309 (77.3%)419 (83.8%)0.656 (0.470-0.916)6.170.013
T91 (22.7%)81 (16.2%)
TT+CT vs. CC0.730 (0.492-1.083)2.460.116
TT vs. CT+CC0.265 (0.102-0.685)8.520.003

rs2227491AA60 (30%)72 (28.8%)Ref
AG83 (41.5%)123 (49.2%)1.235 (0.794-1.920)0.880.348
GG57 (28.5%)55 (22%)0.804 (0.485-1.332)0.720.396
A203 (50.8%)267 (53.4%)0.899 (0.691-1.170)0.630.429
G197 (49.2%)233 (46.6%)
GG+AG vs. AA1.060 (0.705-1.593)0.080.781
GG vs. AG+AA0.708 (0.461-1.086)2.510.113

rs2227483TT153 (76.5%)204 (81.6%)Ref
AT26 (13%)13 (5.2%)0.375 (0.187-0.754)8.050.004
AA21 (10.5%)33 (13.2%)1.179 (0.656-2.117)0.30.582
T332 (83%)421 (84.2%)0.916 (0.643-1.306)0.230.628
A68 (17%)79 (15.8%)
AA+AT vs. TT0.734 (0.465-1.160)1.760.184
AA vs. AT+TT1.296 (0.724-2.319)0.770.381

3.2. The Association of the IL-22 Genotype and Allele Distribution and Risk of Advanced P. falciparum Malaria Based on Parasite Density

The malaria group was classified into four cohorts depicting low to high parasite density: I, II, III, and IV. The rs2227481 CT genotype was significantly higher in cohort IV than in cohorts I+II+III and associated with a higher risk of the more severe form of the disease (genotype frequency 33.1% versus 17.8%, OR = 2.208; 95% CI 1.170-4.170, χ2 = 6.13, and P = 0.013) (Table 2). In addition, the T allele was associated with a higher vulnerability to develop advanced P. falciparum malaria infection in a dominant model (OR = 1.833; 95% CI 1.012-3.322, χ2 = 4.05, and P = 0.044). The IL-22 SNPs were examined in cohort I compared to cohort II+III+IV and cohort I+II compared to cohorts III+IV; however, none of the SNPs showed any statistically significant distribution between the groups (Supplementary Tables and ).
Table 2

Genotype distribution and allele frequency of IL-22 SNPs in group I+II+III of parasite density compared to group IV.

SNPsGenotype/allele distributionGroup I+II+IIIGroup IVOR (95% CI) χ 2 P value
rs976748TT86 (95.6%)150 (93.8%)Ref
CT4 (4.4%)9 (5.6%)1.290 (0.386-4.314)0.170.678
CC0 (0%)1 (0.6%)1.724 (0.069-42.790)0.570.449
T176 (97.8%)309 (96.6%)1.566 (0.491-4.993)0.580.444
C4 (2.2%)11 (3.4%)
CC+CT vs. TT1.433 (0.436-4.709)0.360.551
CC vs. CT+TT0.587 (0.024-14.571)0.560.452

rs1179246CC28 (31.1%)57 (35.6%)Ref
AC43 (47.8%)69 (43.1%)0.788 (0.436-1.424)0.620.429
AA19 (21.1%)34 (21.3%)0.879 (0.427-1.808)0.120.725
C99 (55%)183 (57.2%)0.915 (0.633-1.322)0.220.635
A81 (45%)137 (42.8%)
AA+AC vs. CC0.816 (0.470-1.416)0.520.469
AA vs. AC+CC1.008 (0.536-1.898)00.979

rs2046068AA39 (43.3%)75 (46.9%)Ref
AC44 (48.9%)67 (41.9%)0.792 (0.460-1.362)0.710.398
CC7 (7.8%)18 (11.2%)1.337 (0.515-3.475)0.360.550
A122 (67.8%)217 (67.8%)0.998 (0.675-1.476)00.993
C58 (32.2%)103 (32.2%)
CC+AC vs. AA0.867 (0.515-1.458)0.290.589
CC vs. AC+AA1.503 (0.603-3.749)0.770.379

rs1182844TT27 (30%)63 (39.4%)Ref
AT46 (51.1%)74 (46.2%)0.689(0.385-1.234)1.570.209
AA17 (18.9%)23 (14.4%)0.580 (0.268-1.255)1.930.164
T100 (55.6%)200 (62.5%)0.750 (0.518-1.087)2.310.128
A80 (44.4%)120 (37.5%)
AA+AT vs. TT0.660 (0.380-1.145)2.20.138
AA vs. AT+TT0.721 (0.362-1.435)0.870.350

rs2227508AA57 (63.3%)109 (68.1%)Ref
AT26 (28.9%)45 (28.1%)0.905 (0.507-1.616)0.110.735
TT7 (7.8%)6 (3.8%)0.448 (0.144-1.397)20.157
A140 (77.8%)263 (82.2%)0.759 (0.482-1.194)1.430.231
T40 (22.2%)57 (17.8%)
TT+AT vs. AA0.808 (0.470-1.390)0.590.441
TT vs. AT+AA0.462 (0.150-1.420)1.90.168

rs2227478TT35 (38.9%)65 (40.6%)Ref
CT38 (42.2%)77 (48.1%)1.091 (0.620-1.921)0.090.762
CC17 (18.9%)18 (11.3%)0.570(0.261-1.244)2.020.155
T108 (60%)207 (64.7%)0.819 (0.562-1.193)1.090.297
C72 (40%)113 (35.3%)
CC+CT vs. TT0.930 (0.548-1.577)0.070.787
CC vs. CT+TT0.544 (0.265-1.119)2.790.094

rs2227481CC70 (77.8%)105 (65.6%)Ref
CT16 (17.8%)53 (33.1%)2.208 (1.170-4.170)6.130.013
TT4 (4.4%)2 (1.3%)0.333 (0.059-1.869)1.710.191
C156 (86.7%)263 (82.2%)1.409 (0.841-2.361)1.70.191
T24 (13.3%)57 (17.8%)
TT+CT vs. CC1.833 (1.012-3.322)4.050.044
TT vs. CT+CC0.272 (0.0488-1.516)2.510.113

rs2227491AA24 (26.7%)48 (30%)Ref
AG49 (54.4%)74 (46.2%)0.755 (0.411-1.388)0.820.365
GG17 (18.9%)38 (23.8%)1.118 (0526-2.373)0.080.772
A97 (53.9%)170 (53.1%)1.031 (0.715-1.487)0.030.869
G83 (46.1%)150 (46.9%)
GG+AG vs. AA0.848 (0.477-1.510)0.310.576
GG vs. AG+AA1.338 (0.704-2.540)0.790.373

rs2227483TT73 (81.1%)131 (81.9%)Ref
AT4 (4.4%)9 (5.6%)1.254 (0.373-4.213)0.130.714
AA13 (14.5%)20 (12.5%)0.857 (0.403-1.823)0.160.689
T150 (83.3%)271 (84.7%)0.904 (0.550-1.485)0.160.690
A30 (16.7%)49 (15.3%)
AA+AT vs. TT0.951 (0.490-1.846)0.020.881
AA vs. AT+TT0.846 (0.399-1.794)0.190.662

3.3. The Association of the IL-22 Genotype and Allele Distribution Based on the Age of Infected Patients

A comparison of the malaria group in the 1-5 year age group with the 6 years and older age group indicated that the frequency of the rs2046068 A allele was statistically lower in the 6 years and older group (67% versus 92.9%, OR = 6.380; 95% CI 0.827-49.203, χ2 = 4.14, and P = 0.044). Also, the rs2046068 A allele was significant in a dominant model (OR = 7.5; 95% CI 0.889-63.242, χ2 = 4.67, and P = 0.030) (Table 3).
Table 3

Genotype distribution and allele frequency of IL-22 SNPs in group 1-5 years of age compared to 6 years and above age group.

SNPsGenotype/allele distribution1-5 years6 years and aboveOR (95% CI) χ 2 P value
rs976748TT7 (100%)229 (94.3%)Ref
CT0 (0%)13 (5.3%)0.882 (0.048-16.276)0.40.528
CC0 (0%)1 (0.4%)0.098 (0.004-2.611)0.030.861
T14 (100%)471 (97%)0.953 (0.054-16.717)0.451
C0 (0%)15 (3%)
CC+CT vs. TT0.948 (0.052-17.423)0.430.513
CC vs. CT+TT0.093 (0.004-2.471)0.030.864

rs1179246CC2 (28.6%)85 (35%)Ref
AC5 (71.4%)107 (44%)0.504 (0.095-2.660)0.680.410
AA0 (0%)51 (21%)3.012 (0.142-63.975)1.190.275
C9 (64.3%)277 (57%)1.358 (0.449-4.112)0.30.586
A5 (35.7%)209 (43%)
AA+AC vs. CC0.744 (0.141-3.914)0.120.725
AA vs. AC+CC4.013 (0.225-71.433)1.850.174

rs2046068AA6 (85.7%)108 (44.4%)Ref
AC1 (14.3%)110 (45.3%)6.111 (0.724-51.609)3.550.059
CC0 (0%)25 (10.3%)3.055 (0.167-56.007)1.380.240
A13 (92.9%)326 (67%)6.380 (0.827-49.203)4.140.044
C1 (7.1%)160 (33%)
CC+AC vs. AA7.500(0.889-63.242)4.670.030
CC vs. AC+AA1.751 (0.097-31.562)0.80.371

rs1182844TT3 (42.9%)87 (35.8%)Ref
AT4 (57.1%)116 (47.7%)1.00 (0.218-4.584)01
AA0 (0%)40 (16.5%)3.240 (0.164-64.205)1.360.242
T10 (71.4%)290 (59.7%)1.690 (0.523-5.464)0.780.375
A4 (28.6%)196 (40.3%)
AA+AT vs. TT1.345 (0.294-6.147)0.150.701
AA vs. AT+TT2.985 (0.167-53.317)1.370.241

rs2227508AA6 (85.7%)160 (65.8%)Ref
AT1 (14.3%)70 (28.8%)2.625 (0.310-22.212)0.840.358
TT0 (0%)13 (5.4%)1.093 (0.058-20.469)0.490.485
A13 (92.9%)390 (80.2%)3.200 (0.414-24.762)1.380.323
T1 (7.1%)96 (19.8%)
TT+AT vs. AA3.112 (0.369-26.284)1.20.272
TT vs. AT+AA0.879 (0.047-16.206)0.40.529

rs2227478TT5 (71.4%)95 (39.1%)Ref
CT2 (28.6%)113 (46.5%)2.974 (0.564-15.677)1.810.179
CC0 (0%)35 (14.4%)4.089 (0.220-75.860)1.820.177
T12 (85.7%)303 (62.3%)3.624 (0.802-16.374)3.190.074
C2 (14.3%)183 (37.7%)
CC+CT vs. TT3.895 (0.741-20.482)2.960.085
CC vs. CT+TT2.554 (0.143-45.516)1.170.278

rs2227481CC6 (85.7%)169 (69.5%)Ref
CT1 (14.3%)68 (28%)2.414 (0.285-20.430)0.70.404
TT0 (0%)6 (2.5%)0.499 (0.025-9.827)0.210.644
C13 (92.9%)406 (83.5%)2.562 (0.330-19.859)0.870.710
T1 (7.1%)80 (16.5%)
TT+CT vs. CC2.627 (0.311-22.209)0.850.357
TT vs. CT+CC0.411 (0.0211-7.977)0.180.673

rs2227491AA3 (42.9%)72 (29.6%)Ref
AG4 (57.1%)119 (49%)1.240 (0.270-5.698)0.080.782
GG0 (0%)52 (21.4%)5.069 (0.256-100.237)2.130.144
A10 (71.4%)263 (54.1%)2.120 (0.656-6.852)1.650.199
G4 (28.6%)223 (45.9%)
GG+AG vs. AA1.781 (0.389-8.161)0.570.451
GG vs. AG+AA4.112 (0.231-73.184)1.890.169

rs2227483TT5 (71.4%)199 (81.9%)Ref
AT0 (0%)13 (5.3%)0.744 (0.039-14.180)0.330.567
AA2 (28.6%)31 (12.8%)0.389 (0.072-2.096)1.290.255
T10 (71.4%)411 (84.6%)0.456 (0.139-1.493)1.770.252
A4 (28.6%)75 (15.4%)
AA+AT vs. TT0.553 (0.104-2.942)0.50.481
AA vs. AT+TT0.365 (0.068-1.966)1.490.222
Comparing the malaria group in a 1-9 years age group with a 10 years and older age group, the frequency of the rs976748 CT genotype was significantly higher in the 1-9 years age group compared to the other group (genotype frequency 16.7% versus 4.3%, OR = 0.226; 95% CI 0.056-0.910, χ2 = 5.14, and P = 0.023) (Table 4). Under a dominant mode of inheritance, rs976748 was associated with a higher risk of P. falciparum malaria infection in the 10 years and older age group (OR = 0.249; 95% CI 0.063-0.989, χ2 = 4.49, and P = 0.034). The rs2227478 CT genotype was substantially elevated in the 10 years and older age group malaria compared to the younger age group (genotype frequency 47.8% versus 22.2%, OR = 3.430; 95% CI 1.056-11.138, χ2 = 4.66, and P = 0.030) (Table 4). Similarly, the A allele of SNP rs2046068 was more frequent in the 1-9 years age group (83.3% versus 66.6%, OR = 2.508; 95% CI 1.022-6.154, χ2 = 4.29, and P = 0.038), with the T allele of rs2227483 associated with the 10 years and older age group (85.3% versus 69.4%, OR = 0.390; 95% CI 0.184-0.830, χ2 = 6.35, and P = 0.011).
Table 4

Genotype distribution and allele frequency of IL-22 SNPs in group 1-9 years of age compared to 10 years and above age group.

SNPsGenotype/allele distribution1-9 years10 years and aboveOR (95% CI) χ 2 P value
rs976748TT15 (83.3%)221 (95.3%)Ref
CT3 (16.7%)10 (4.3%)0.226 (0.056-0.910)5.140.023
CC0 (0%)1 (0.4%)0.210 (0.008-5.370)0.070.794
T33 (91.7%)452 (97.4%)0.292 (0.079-1.086)3.790.085
C3 (8.3%)12 (2.6%)
CC+CT vs. TT0.249 (0.063-0.989)4.490.034
CC vs. CT+TT0.240 (0.009-6.094)0.080.780

rs1179246CC5 (27.8%)80 (34.5%)Ref
AC8 (44.4%)104 (44.8%)0.812 (0.256-2.578)0.120.724
AA5 (27.8%)48 (20.7%)0.600 (0.165-2.180)0.610.433
C18 (50%)264 (56.9%)0.758 (0.384-1.493)0.650.421
A18 (50%)200 (43.1%)
AA+AC vs. CC0.731 (0.252-2.123)0.330.562
AA vs. AC+CC10.678 (0.231-1.996)0.50.478

rs2046068AA12 (66.7%)102 (44%)Ref
AC6 (33.3%)105 (45.3%)2.059 (0.745-5.693)20.156
CC0 (0%)25 (10.7%)6.220 (0.356-108.579)2.880.089
A30 (83.3%)309 (66.6%)2.508 (1.022-6.154)4.290.038
C6 (16.7%)155 (33.4%)
CC+AC vs. AA2.549(0.925-7.024)3.470.062
CC vs. AC+AA4.547 (0.266-77.748)2.160.142

rs1182844TT7 (38.9%)83 (35.8%)Ref
AT11 (61.1%)109 (41%)0.836 (0.311-2.248)0.130.721
AA0 (0%)40 (17.2%)7.275 (0.405-130.544)3.290.069
T25 (69.4%)275 (59.3%)1.562 (0.751-3.251)1.440.229
A11 (30.6%)189 (40.7%)
AA+AT vs. TT1.142 (0.427-3.059)0.070.790
AA vs. AT+TT7.784 (0.459-131.835)3.690.054

rs2227508AA14 (77.8%)152 (65.5%)Ref
AT4 (22.2%)67 (28.9%)1.543 (0.490-4.861)0.560.456
TT0 (0%)13 (5.6%)2.567 (0.145-45.441)1.190.275
A32 (88.9%)371 (80%)2.005 (0.692-5.811)1.70.191
T4 (11.1%)93 (20%)
TT+AT vs. AA1.842 (0.587-5.781)1.130.288
TT vs. AT+AA2.276 (0.130-39.829)1.060.302

rs2227478TT11 (61.1%)89 (38.4%)Ref
CT4 (22.2%)111 (47.8%)3.430 (1.056-11.138)4.660.030
CC3 (16.7%)32 (13.8%)1.318 (0.346-5.030)0.160.685
T26 (72.2%)289 (62.3%)1.574 (0.741-3.343)1.420.234
C10 (27.8%)175 (37.7%)
CC+CT vs. TT2.525 (0.944-6.754)3.60.057
CC vs. CT+TT0.800 (0.219-2.919)0.110.735

rs2227481CC13 (72.2%)162 (69.8%)Ref
CT4 (22.2%)65 (28%)1.304 (0.410-4.147)0.20.652
TT1 (5.6%)5 (2.2%)0.401 (0.044-3.695)0.690.404
C30 (83.3%)389 (83.8%)0.964(0.388-2.397)0.010.937
T6 (16.7%)75 (16.2%)
TT+CT vs. CC1.123 (0.386-3.271)0.050.830
TT vs. CT+CC0.374 (0.041-3.389)0.820.363

rs2227491AA5 (27.7%)71 (30.6%)Ref
AG12 (66.7%)111 (47.8%)0.651 (0.220-1.928)0.610.435
GG1 (5.6%)50 (21.6%)3.52 (0.399-31.065)1.450.229
A22 (61.1%)253 (54.5%)1.311 (0.654-2.625)0.590.444
G14 (38.9%)211 (45.5%)
GG+AG vs. AA0.872(0.300-2.539)0.060.801
GG vs. AG+AA4.670 (0.607-35.952)2.630.104

rs2227483TT12 (66.7%)192 (82.8%)Ref
AT1 (5.6%)12 (5.2%)0.750 (0.090-6.259)0.070.789
AA5 (27.7%)28 (12%)0.350 (0.115-1.068)3.670.055
T25 (69.4%)396 (85.3%)0.390 (0.184-0.830)6.350.011
A11 (30.6%)68 (14.7%)
AA+AT vs. TT0.417 (0.148-1.176)2.880.089
AA vs. AT+TT0.357 (0.118-1.077)3.60.057
No relationship was observed between the IL-22 SNPs and the risk of P. falciparum malaria comparing the malaria group in the 10-20 years age group with the 21 years and older group (Supplementary ). Finally, we investigated whether the IL-22 gene SNPs significantly differed in frequency between the P. falciparum malaria group, 1-9 years age group, and 41 years and older age group (Table 5). We found that the IL-22 rs2046068 A allele was significantly associated with a higher risk of P. falciparum malaria in the 1-9 years age group. In addition, the A allele of rs2046068 was statistically higher in the 1-9 years age group compared to the 41 years and older age group (allele frequency 83.3% versus 65.7%, OR = 2.606; 95% CI 0.995-6.821, χ2 = 3.99, and P = 0.045). No dominant or recessive statistically significant relationship was observed between the two groups. In contrast, the IL-22 rs2227483 T allele was associated with a high susceptibility to develop P. falciparum malaria in the 41 years and older age group with a higher frequency of the rs2227483 T allele (allele frequency 86.1% versus 69.4%, OR = 0.367; 95% CI 0.150-0.897, χ2 = 5.07, and P = 0.024). For both SNPs, no dominant or recessive relationship was detected.
Table 5

Genotype distribution and allele frequency of IL-22 SNPs in group 1-9 years of age compared to 41 years and above age group.

SNPsGenotype/allele distribution1-9 years41 years and aboveOR (95% CI) χ 2 P value
rs976748TT15 (83.3%)49 (90.7%)Ref
CT3 (16.7%)5 (9.3%)0.510 (0.109-2.389)0.750.386
CC0 (0%)0 (0%)0.313 (0.006-16.446)Nan1
T33 (91.7%)103 (95.4%)0.534 (0.121-2.355)0.710.412
C3 (8.3%)5 (4.6%)
CC+CT vs. TT0.510 (0.109-2.389)0.750.386
CC vs. CT+TT0.339 (0.007-17.723)Nan1

rs1179246CC5 (27.8%)25 (46.3%)Ref
AC8 (44.4%)16 (29.6%)0.400 (0.111-1.441)2.030.154
AA5 (27.8%)13 (24.1%)0.520 (0.127-2.128)0.840.358
C18 (50%)66 (61.1%)0.636 (0.298-1.360)1.370.241
A18 (50%)42 (38.9%)
AA+AC vs. CC0.446 (0.140-1.426)1.90.167
AA vs. AC+CC0.824 (0.247-2.752)0.10.753

rs2046068AA12 (66.7%)25 (46.3%)Ref
AC6 (33.3%)21 (38.9%)1.680 (0.538-5.247)0.80.369
CC0 (0%)8 (14.8%)8.333 (0.444-156.275)3.540.059
A30 (83.3%)71 (65.7%)2.606 (0.995-6.821)3.990.045
C6 (16.7%)37 (34.3%)
CC+AC vs. AA2.320(0.760-7.085)2.240.134
CC vs. AC+AA6.763 (0.371-123.24)30.083

rs1182844TT7 (38.9%)20 (37%)Ref
AT11 (61.1%)22 (40.7%)0.700 (0.227-2.155)0.390.533
AA0 (0%)12 (22.2%)9.146 (0.480-174.374)3.790.051
T25 (69.4%)62 (57.4%)1.686 (0.754-3.772)1.640.200
A11 (30.6%)46 (42.6%)
AA+AT vs. TT1.082 (0.361-3.240)0.020.888
AA vs. AT+TT10.882 (0.612-193.665)4.80.028

rs2227508AA14 (77.8%)36 (66.7%)Ref
AT4 (22.2%)14 (25.9%)1.361 (0.382-4.852)0.230.633
TT0 (0%)4 (7.4%)3.757 (0.181-70.702)1.510.218
A32 (88.9%)86 (79.6%)2.047 (0.654-6.399)1.560.211
T4 (11.1%)22 (20.4%)
TT+AT vs. AA1.750 (0.503-6.089)0.790.375
TT vs. AT+AA3.297 (0.169-64.262)1.410.234

rs2227478TT11 (61.1%)24 (44.4%)Ref
CT4 (22.2%)20 (37%)2.292 (0.631-8.317)1.640.200
CC3 (16.7%)10 (18.5%)1.528 (0.350-6.674)0.320.571
T26 (72.2%)68 (63%)1.529(0.669-3.498)1.020.312
C10 (27.8%)40 (37%)
CC+CT vs. TT1.964 (0.661-5.837)1.50.220
CC vs. CT+TT1.136 (0.276-4.688)0.030.859

rs2227481CC13 (72.2%)38 (70.4%)Ref
CT4 (22.2%)13 (24.1%)1.112 (0.307-4.021)0.030.871
TT1 (5.6%)3 (5.5%)1.026 (0.098-10.752)00.982
C30 (83.3%)89 (82.4%)1.067 (0.390-2.921)0.020.898
T6 (16.7%)19 (17.6%)
TT+CT vs. CC1.095 (0.335-3.582)0.020.881
TT vs. CT+CC1.00 (0.097-10.265)01

rs2227491AA5 (27.7%)20 (37%)Ref
AG12 (66.7%)22 (40.7%)0.458 (0.137-1.531)1.640.199
GG1 (5.6%)12 (22.2%)3 (0.312-28.841)0.970.336
A22 (61.1%)62 (57.4%)1.166 (0.539-2.521)0.150.696
G14 (38.9%)46 (42.6%)
GG+AG vs. AA0.6654 (0.203-2.107)0.510.474
GG vs. AG+AA4.857 (0.585-40.32)2.530.111

rs2227483TT12 (66.7%)46 (85.2%)Ref
AT1 (5.6%)1 (1.9%)0.261 (0.015-4.481)0.980.322
AA5 (27.7%)7 (12.9%)0.365(0.098-1.356)2.380.122
T25 (69.4%)93 (86.1%)0.367 (0.150-0.897)5.070.024
A11 (30.6%)15 (13.9%)
AA+AT vs. TT0.348 (0.101-1.195)2.960.085
AA vs. AT+TT0.387 (0.105-1.423)2.130.144

3.4. The Association of the IL-22 Haplotype and Risk of P. falciparum-Associated Malaria

A haplotype analysis was done between the P. falciparum-infected group and the control group and two blocks were generated. Block 1 comprised the IL-22 polymorphisms rs1179246, rs1182844, and rs976748, with block 2 consisting of IL-22 polymorphisms rs2046068 and rs2227491 (Table 6). One haplotype in block 1 was statistically significant. The haplotype A-T-T involving the alleles of rs1179246, rs1182844, and rs976748 was statistically more frequent in the control group than the malaria group (frequency 41%, P = 0.034). In block 2, one haplotype A-G of rs2046068 and rs2227491 was statistically significant and prevalent in the control group but not in the malaria group (Frequency 49.4%, P = 0.041).
Table 6

Haplotypes of IL-22 gene when control group was compared to patients' group.

Haplotype (block 1)Freq.Case, control ratio countsCase, control frequenciesChi square P value
rs1179246rs1182844rs976748
ATT0.41189.3 : 310.7, 179.3 : 220.70.379, 0.4484.4650.034
CAT0.356186.3 : 313.7, 134.3 : 265.70.373, 0.3361.3120.252
CTT0.18895.7 : 404.3, 73.7 : 326.30.191, 0.1840.0750.783
ATC0.02615.0 : 485.0, 8.0 : 392.00.030, 0.0200.8920.344
AAT0.0213.7 : 486.3, 4.7 : 395.30.027, 0.0122.7330.098

Haplotype (block 2)
rs2046068rs2227491
AG0.494231.9 : 268.1, 212.9 : 187.10.464, 0.5324.1740.041
CA0.306159.9 : 340.1, 115.9 : 284.10.320, 0.2900.940.332
AA0.198107.1 : 392.9, 71.1 : 328.90.214, 0.1781.8660.171

3.5. The Association of the IL-22 Haplotype and Risk of Advanced P. falciparum Malaria Based on Parasite Density

A haplotype analysis was performed between cohort I+II and cohort III+IV of varied parasite density (Table 7). The distribution of only one haplotype was found to be significantly different in the groups. The haplotype C-A-C-A-C-C including alleles of rs1179246, rs1182844, rs2046068, rs2227491, rs2227481, and rs2227478 occurred more frequently in cohort I+II (frequency 13.7%, P = 0.036).
Table 7

Haplotypes of IL-22 gene when group I+II of parasite density was compared to group III+IV.

HaplotypesFreq.Case, control ratio countsCase, control frequenciesChi square P value
rs1179246rs1182844rs2046068rs2227491rs2227481rs2227478
ATAGCT0.374158.1 : 265.9, 28.7 : 47.30.373, 0.3780.0070.933
CAAACT0.14563.9 : 360.1, 8.6 : 67.40.151, 0.1130.7320.392
CACACC0.13752.3 : 371.7, 16.2 : 59.80.123, 0.2134.3860.036
CTCATC0.144.8 : 379.2, 5.2 : 70.80.106, 0.0690.9590.327
CAAACC0.03816.9 : 407.1, 2.3 : 73.70.040, 0.0300.1780.672
CACACT0.03215.9 : 408.1, 0.2 : 75.80.037, 0.0032.4570.117
CTCACC0.0176.6 : 417.4, 1.9 : 74.10.016, 0.0250.3230.569
CTAGCT0.0176.8 : 417.2, 1.4 : 74.60.016, 0.0190.0240.877
ATAGCC0.0166.9 : 417.1, 1.3 : 74.70.016, 0.0170.0030.955
CTAGCC0.0157.4 : 416.6, 0.0 : 76.00.018, 0.0001.3120.252
CTAGTC0.0147.1 : 416.9, 0.0 : 76.00.017, 0.0001.2920.255
CTAGCC0.0134.5 : 419.5, 1.7 : 74.30.011, 0.0230.7780.377
AACACC0.0125.8 : 418.2, 0.1 : 75.90.014, 0.0010.8690.351

3.6. The Association of the IL-22 Haplotype and Risk of Malaria Based on Age Groups

A haplotype distribution analysis was done in the malaria group for two age groups, 1-5 years and 6 years and older. The frequency of two haplotypes was found to be either statistically significant or close to significance (Table 8). The haplotype A-G of rs2046068 and rs2227491 was more frequent in the 1-5 years age group (frequency 46.3%, P = 0.056). However, the haplotype C-A of rs2046068 and rs2227491 was significantly high in the 6 years and older age group (frequency 31.9%, P = 0.043).
Table 8

Haplotypes of IL-22 gene when group 1-5 years of age was compared to 6 years and above.

HaplotypesFreq.Case, control ratio countsCase, control frequenciesChi square P value
rs2046068rs2227491
AG0.463221.7 : 264.3, 10.0 : 4.00.456, 0.7143.6370.056
CA0.319158.7 : 327.3, 1.0 : 13.00.327, 0.0714.0840.043
AA0.215104.3 : 381.7, 3.0 : 11.00.215, 0.21500.999
A haplotype analysis was also performed between patients in the 1-9 years and 10 years and older age groups. One single haplotype was statistically significant (Table 9). The haplotype C-A of rs2046068 and rs2227491 was elevated in the 10 years and older age group compared with the 1-9 years age group (frequency 31.9%, P = 0.041).
Table 9

Haplotypes of IL-22 gene when group 1-9 years of age was compared to 10 years and above.

HaplotypeFreq.Case, control ratio countsCase, control frequenciesChi square P value
rs2046068rs2227491
AG0.463209.7 : 254.3, 22.0 : 14.00.452, 0.6113.3780.066
CA0.319153.7 : 310.3, 6.0 : 30.00.331, 0.1664.1930.041
AA0.21599.3 : 364.7, 8.0 : 28.00.214, 0.2230.0150.901
Finally, we assessed the haplotype distribution between patients in the 1-9 years and 41 years and older age groups. The distribution of two haplotypes was significantly different in these two groups (Table 10). The haplotype C-A of rs2046068 and rs2227491 was higher in 41 years and older age group (frequency 29.9%, P = 0.045).
Table 10

Haplotypes of IL-22 gene when group 1-9 years of age was compared to 41 years and above.

HaplotypeFreq.Case, control ratio countsCase, control frequenciesChi Square P value
rs2046068rs2227491
AG0.47246.0 : 62.0, 22.0 : 14.00.426, 0.6113.7150.053
CA0.29937.0 : 71.0, 6.0 : 30.00.343, 0.1673.990.045
AA0.22925.0 : 83.0, 8.0 : 28.00.231, 0.2220.0130.908

3.7. Functional Analysis of the SNPs Located in the IL-22 Promoter

For the delineation of the molecular mechanisms driving the IL-22 gene, nested deletions from the IL-22 promoter were generated (Figure 1(a)) and cloned in a luciferase expression system. The clones were transfected in the HEK293 cell line for 48 hours. Cells were harvested and tested for mean luciferase activity. As demonstrated in Figure 1(a), construct F3R1 containing IL-22 variant rs2227513 showed maximum luciferase activity.
Figure 1

Luciferase activity assay for fragments containing the promoter of IL-22 gene. (a) Nested deletions of the promoter region were generated and cloned. The clones were then transfected in HEK293 cell line for 48 h. Cells were harvested and tested for luciferase activity. (b) Two constructs of fragment F3R1 containing SNP rs2227513 were generated. One clone harbored A allele and the other clone contained G allele of SNP rs2227513. Luciferase activity was performed as shown in (a).

To test whether rs2227513 contributes to the expression of the IL-22, one nucleotide was changed in clone F3/R1 (Figure 1(b)). The IL-22 promoter activity of the variant rs2227513 alleles A and G was measured. The findings indicated that the HEK293 cells transfected with variant rs2227513 G allele had statistically significant higher luciferase activity compared to the A allele (P < 0.0001).

4. Discussion

Globally, malaria remains one of the major causes of mortality in children younger than 5 years [3]. Recently a malaria vaccine, known as RTS, S/AS01 (RTS, S), was introduced for a pilot study in three African countries, Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. However, the vaccine is reportedly effective only against P. falciparum and has an efficacy of 39% [25]. The diverse manifestations of the disease in malaria patients drives the urgency in the search for a vaccine. It is known that there is a significant variation in the clinical symptoms associated with malaria. While some patients would die of severe malaria infection, others would have an uncomplicated infection [26]. Such disease variation suggests that in addition to the parasite and environmental influence, the genetic characteristics of the host is central in determining the clinical outcome in P. falciparum-infected patients. The understanding of genetic differences in populations substantially transformed the development of vaccines in general and assisted in developing the most recent malaria vaccine [25, 27]. In this study, we examined the frequency of nine SNPs (rs976748, rs1179246, rs2046068, rs1182844, rs2227508, rs2227478, rs2227481, rs2227491, and rs2227483) in the IL-22 gene in P. falciparum malaria infection. The aim was to determine whether there is an association in terms of vulnerability or protection as indicated by the level of parasite density or the age group distribution. IL-22 is suggested to have a protective role in severe anemia-associated malaria infection, as it has been reported that IL-22 is elevated in children infected with P. falciparum [28]. Only a few studies have investigated the role of IL-22 SNPs in malaria [21, 22, 29]. The first report of the involvement of IL-22 SNPs in malaria found two IL-22 SNPs in West African children infected with P. falciparum malaria; one correlated with protection against SM (rs2227491) and the second with susceptibility to CM (rs2227478) [21]. However, both SNPs were not significant in our population for any of the tested traits. Another study in Nigerian and Malawian populations found that the T allele of two IL-22 variants, rs2227476 and rs2227473, in the promoter region is associated with CM [22]. Notably, rs2227476 is in high LD (r2 = 0.92) with rs2227481 and is significantly associated with the risk of P. falciparum malaria in our population. There is a dearth of data to study the role of the IL-22 gene with vulnerability or protection, parasite density and age-related risk of P. falciparum malaria infection. In the present study, we strengthen the possible relationship between the IL-22 rs2227481 T allele with protection against P. falciparum malaria infection in a recessive mode of inheritance, with a similar association found for individuals with a homozygous TT genotype. It was also found that the C allele of this SNP is associated with an increased risk of malaria infection. Our highest significant SNP (rs2227481) is in high LD with rs2227476, previously linked to a predisposition to childhood CM in an African population, potentially by altering the binding site for several transcription factors as suggested by the in silico analysis [22]. Our study supports the evidence of the role of IL-22 in the clinical manifestation of P. falciparum-associated malaria. It has been reported that the IL-22 rs2227481 polymorphism plays a crucial role in effector T cell pathways [30]. Exploring the influence of IL-22 rs2227481 on parasite density and age-related risk of malaria infection, we found that the IL-22 rs2227481 homozygous CC genotype, in a dominant mode of inheritance, is associated with a higher P. falciparum parasite density in the Saudi Arabian population. The rs2227481 T allele was associated with a low parasite density in a dominant model. However, no relationship was observed for an age-related risk of the infection. The results indicate that the rs2227481 T and homozygous TT genotype may be important in protecting against P. falciparum malaria infection. The IL-22 variant rs2227483 is located within putative binding sites for the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR-ARNT) complex, and it has been suggested that this complex transcription factor induce IL-22 expression [31]. The AhR-ARNT receptor complex interacts with miscellaneous ligands and is a key in regulating IL-22 production [22]. For the IL-22 rs2227483 polymorphism, the heterozygous AT genotype was significantly associated with protection against P. falciparum infection. Zhang et al. demonstrated that the A and T alleles of IL-22 rs2227483 were significantly elevated in controls compared to tuberculosis (TB) cases and suggested that rs2227483 A and T alleles are associated with increased production of IL-22 decreasing vulnerability to TB infection [32]. Notably, others have found that the rs2227483 genotype TT is statistically associated with early-onset psoriasis through the high production of IL-22 cytokine [31]. Although we did not find any association between the rs2227483 TT genotype and P. falciparum infection, the malaria group possessed a higher TT genotype compared to the controls. Our findings and literature suggest that the variant rs2227483 TT genotype could have a role in the altered IL-22 expression and increased risk of malaria infection. As parasite density is associated with a more severe outcome in P. falciparum malaria [33, 34], we analyzed our data in relation to parasite density. The only variant that had a statistically significant distribution is rs2227481 when cohorts I+II+III were compared to cohort IV. This SNP is located upstream of the IL-22 gene and could influence the expression levels of the protein; however, the conclusion should be substantiated by experimental evidence. The IL-22 gene polymorphism rs2046068 was not statistically associated with either protection or risk of malaria infection or the level of parasite density. Similarly, Weger et al. did not find any relationship of the rs2046068 genotype and haplotype analysis with chronic plaque psoriasis [35]. In the current study, the rs2046068 AA genotype was higher in the control group. Song et al. also showed an elevated rs2046068 AA genotype in the control group in contrast to a group with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), Graves' disease (GD), and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). However, the relationship was not statistically significant [36]. We found that the rs2046068 A allele in the IL-22 gene was statistically high under a dominant mode of inheritance in the malaria group within the 1-5 years age group compared to the 6 years and older age group. Conversely, the frequency of the rs2046068 C allele was predominant in the malaria group, 6 years and older, in a dominant inheritance model. The haplotype distribution analysis at the IL-22 gene demonstrated statistically significant frequencies between the control and P. falciparum-infected malaria groups. We detected a high frequency of the rs1179246-rs1182844-rs976748 A-T-T haplotype in the control group compared to the malaria group, suggesting the role of the A-T-T haplotype in protecting against P. falciparum infection. Similarly, an elevated frequency of the rs2046068-rs2227491 A-G haplotype was observed in the control group. Wang et al. did not find any association between the rs2227491 and serum IL-22 levels of the control group in SLE cases in a Chinese population [20]. With the haplotype analysis for the level of parasite density when comparing cohort I+II with III+IV, the results showed a significantly higher frequency of the rs1179246-rs1182844-rs2046068-rs2227491-rs2227481-rs2227478 C-A-C-A-C-C haplotype in the I+II cohort. The contribution of these haplotypes to P. falciparum-associated clinical outcomes and the function of IL-22 need to be experimentally substantiated. The variant rs2227513 is positioned at the first intron of the IL-22 gene and it is also part of the promoter region of the IL-22 gene. Studies suggest that introns are imperative modulators of gene functions such as RNA editing [37, 38]. In the current study, the IL-22 rs2227513 G allele was associated with higher expression levels of the IL-22 cytokine, as evidenced by statistically higher luciferase reporter gene activity. Although this SNP was excluded from the test of association analysis due to the significant deviation from HWE, it is almost a complete LD (r2 = 0.98) with rs976748, associated with a higher risk of P. falciparum malaria infection. Several studies have shown that variations at the IL-22 gene could contribute to the outcome of different diseases. Mastelic et al. demonstrated a shielding role of IL-22 cytokine against P. chabaudi-induced liver damage [23]. Also, Hu et al. reported a high possibility of HIV infection with the rs2227513 AG genotype [39]. It was also suggested that there is a positive association between the rs2227513 AG genotype and susceptibility to SLE [20]. The latter study showed that the levels of the IL-22 cytokine were statistically less in the AG genotype in contrast to AA genotype, signifying that the rs2227513 AG genotype increases the risk of SLE by reducing the IL-22 cytokine levels [20]. Our findings indicate a potential pathological role of the rs2227513 G allele in malaria infection, evidenced by the higher promoter activity in the luciferase assay. This study suggests that variants in the IL-22 gene may produce different roles in the vulnerability to infection in populations with diverse ethnic backgrounds. A plausible explanation of this disparity could be environmental or other genetic elements. As we did not investigate all the IL-22 gene variants, future case control studies are necessary to confirm the findings of this study and to explore additional links between IL-22 SNPs and the clinical outcome of P. falciparum-associated malaria. It is essential to reproduce a similar study in other populations with a different genetic background to replicate our findings in a larger sample size. In addition, studies to outline the molecular or cellular mechanisms underlying the role of IL-22 in malaria are recommended.

5. Conclusion

Our data shows that the IL-22 rs2227481 TT genotype and T allele and the rs2227483 AT genotype and A allele may be associated with protection against P. falciparum malaria. The IL-22 promoter polymorphism in rs2227513 G allele appears to be associated with higher expression levels of IL-22, which could play a role in the protection against the disease. These findings will increase the current understanding of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of malaria infection.
  36 in total

Review 1.  Group II introns: elaborate ribozymes.

Authors:  A Jacquier
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 2.  How malaria has affected the human genome and what human genetics can teach us about malaria.

Authors:  Dominic P Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Virus infection stages and distinct Th1 or Th17/Th22 T-cell responses in malaria/SHIV coinfection correlate with different outcomes of disease.

Authors:  Bridgett Ryan-Payseur; Zahida Ali; Dan Huang; Crystal Y Chen; Lin Yan; Richard C Wang; William E Collins; Yunqi Wang; Zheng W Chen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Variants in the toll-like receptor signaling pathway and clinical outcomes of malaria.

Authors:  Fabiana M S Leoratti; Lilian Farias; Fabiana P Alves; Martha C Suarez-Mútis; José R Coura; Jorge Kalil; Erney P Camargo; Sandra L Moraes; Rajendranath Ramasawmy
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  IL-10 gene promoter and intron polymorphisms and changes in IL-10 secretion in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  R H Qaddourah; K Magdoud; F L Saldanha; N Mahmood; F E Mustafa; T Mahjoub; W Y Almawi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Clinical aspects of uncomplicated and severe malaria.

Authors:  Alessandro Bartoloni; Lorenzo Zammarchi
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.576

7.  Association between the Interaction of Key Genes Involved in Effector T-Cell Pathways and Susceptibility to Develop allergic Rhinitis: A Population-Based Case-Control Association Study.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Jingyun Li; Chengshuo Wang; Luo Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Variants of Interleukin-22 Gene Confer Predisposition to Autoimmune Thyroid Disease.

Authors:  Rong-Hua Song; Qian Li; Wen Wang; Qiu-Ming Yao; Xiao-Qing Shao; Jin-An Zhang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Analysis of the Clinical Profile in Patients with Plasmodium falciparum Malaria and Its Association with Parasite Density.

Authors:  Praveen Mangal; Shilpa Mittal; Kamal Kachhawa; Divya Agrawal; Bhabagrahi Rath; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

10.  Cross-border movement, economic development and malaria elimination in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammed H Al Zahrani; Abdiasiis I Omar; Abdelmohsin M O Abdoon; Ali Adam Ibrahim; Abdullah Alhogail; Mohamed Elmubarak; Yousif Eldirdiry Elamin; Mohammed A AlHelal; Ali M Alshahrani; Tarig M Abdelgader; Ibrahim Saeed; Tageddin B El Gamri; Mohammed S Alattas; Abdu A Dahlan; Abdullah M Assiri; Joseph Maina; Xiao Hong Li; Robert W Snow
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Understanding the Inflammatory Response in Malaria: A Review of the Dual Role of Cytokines.

Authors:  Gabriela Loredana Popa; Mircea Ioan Popa
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.818

2.  Identification of genetic variants of the IL-22 gene in association with an altered risk of COPD susceptibility.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Qipeng Zhou; Lingzhu Chen; Lian Dong; Mingmei Xiong; Xiaohui Xie; Li Zhao; Jingyi Xu; Zeguang Zheng; Jian Wang; Wenju Lu
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.761

Review 3.  The good and the bad about separation anxiety: roles of IL-22 and IL-22BP in liver pathologies.

Authors:  Anastasios D Giannou; Samuel Huber; Jöran Lücke; Morsal Sabihi; Tao Zhang; Lennart Fynn Bauditz; Ahmad Mustafa Shiri
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 9.623

4.  Associations of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in IL-18 Gene with Plasmodium falciparum-Associated Malaria.

Authors:  Alaa U AlRuwaisan; Mashael R Al-Anazi; Mohammed I Shafeai; Fuad H Rudiny; Ali M Motaen; Saad M Bin Dajem; Hani Alothaid; Kareem Morsy; Saad Alkahtani; Ahmed A Al-Qahtani
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-07-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.