Literature DB >> 32148061

A primary care approach to the management of Arthritis.

Selvandran Rangiah1, Indiran Govender, Zakariya Badat.   

Abstract

Arthritis is a common condition seen frequently by family practitioners, and there are many types of arthritis. Management of arthritis depends largely on the specific type of arthritis that the patient suffers from. In this article, we will provide the primary care doctor with practical information for managing arthritis, focussing on the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; osteoarthritis; primary care doctor; rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32148061      PMCID: PMC8378144          DOI: 10.4102/safp.v62i1.5089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)        ISSN: 2078-6190


Introduction

The term ‘arthritis’ refers to the swelling of a joint or joints with associated limitation of movement, heat, pain or tenderness, which is caused by inflammation or degeneration of one or more joints.[1] It is a common cause of disability that impairs one’s physical and mental well-being, thus being a major burden on healthcare and economic resources.[2] In the United States, the prevalence rate of self-reported arthritis is estimated to be about 59.4 million people,[3] and the condition is a leading cause of major disability in the United Kingdom.[4] There is a paucity of prevalence data in Africa. In South Africa, osteoarthritis is the most prevalent form of arthritis, with a prevalence rate of 55.1% in urban settings, and between 29.5% and 82.7% in adults over 65 years of age in rural settings.[5] Arthritis is the pathological feature in over 100 different chronic diseases involving the joints and connective tissues, with the most common forms being osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis. Less common forms of arthritis include systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, psoriatic arthritis and gout.[6] The three major physiological categories of arthritis include inflammatory (rheumatoid), degenerative (osteoarthritis) and crystal-induced (gout) arthritis. The inflammatory arthritides can be further subdivided into RA (and related disorders) and connective tissue disorders.[7] Although arthritis may be monoarticular or polyarticular, all types may be monoarticular early in the pathological course.[7] Therefore, clinical information and imaging studies are crucial in differentiating between the different types of arthritides (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Classification of arthritis, clinical characteristics, lab and radiological features.[7]

SubtypeArthritisF:MAge of onset (in years)Target jointsDistributionRadiographic featuresLab investigations
DegenerativeOA1:1 to 2:1↑elderlyLower extremity joints, PIP, DIP, first MCP jointAsymmetrical or symmetricalNarrow joint space; osteophytes; subchondral sclerosisNone indicated
Autoimmune connective tissue disease RA3:140–70MTP, MCP, PIP, knees, hips, cervical spineBilateral, symmetricNarrow joint space – symmetrical; thickened capsule; periarticular osteoporosis; marginal erosions; joint deformityRheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP)
SLE9:130–50MCP; PIP of the hands primarilyBilateral, symmetricNo erosions; joint deformity; osteonecrosisANA, anti-ds DNA, anti-Smith antibodies, proteinuria and haematuria, serum C3/C4
Spondyloarthropathies Ankylosing spondylitis1:1015–35SI; spine: vertebral bodies and apophyseal articulations; hip; shoulderBilateral, symmetricErosions; periostitis; ankylosis; thin, marginal syndesmophytesHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) B27, ESR, CRP
Psoriatic arthritis1:130–50Predominantly upper extremity; DIP and PIP; SI; spineBilateral, symmetric; asymmetric in SI joints and extremitiesMarginal or central erosions with periostitis; early joint space widening with eventual narrowing; non-marginal syndesmophytes; SI erosions-
Reiter’s syndrome1:515–35Predominantly lower extremity; MTP; calcaneus; SI; spineAsymmetric in foot; bilateral, symmetric or asymmetric in SI jointsSimilar to psoriatic in the spine and extremities; calcaneal enthesopathyTesting for Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, Salmonella and Shigella titers
Crystal arthritis Gout1:2040–50MTP of first digit; other MTP joints, DIP, midfoot, ankle, DIP joints of handAsymmetric; often monoarticularSoft-tissue nodules (tophi) with calcification; para-articular erosions; intact joint space; no osteopeniaSerum uric acid, uric acid crystals in joint fluid
Infectious arthritis BacterialNot known↑children, elderlyLarge joints – elbows, hips, knees, spine, feverAsymmetric; often monoarticularEffusionsLyme disease testing, joint/blood culture
Viral3:1 to 4:1↑childrenWrists, MCP, PIP, ankle, MTPSymmetric, polyarticular, associated fever and rashNormalHIV, Hepatitis B surface antigen, Hepatitis C virus antibody, Parvovirus B19

Source: Adapted form Adams TL, Marchiori DM. Chapter 9 – Arthritides. In: DM Marchiori, editor. Clinical imaging. 3rd ed. Mosby, United States. 2014; p. 476–624. ISBN 9780323084956. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-08495-6.00009-9

ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; CRP, C-reactive protein; DIP, distal interphalangeal joint; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; F, female; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; M, male; MCP, metacarpophalangeal joint; MTP, metatarsophalangeal joint; OA, osteoarthritis; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joint; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SI, sacroiliac joint; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide.

Classification of arthritis, clinical characteristics, lab and radiological features.[7] Source: Adapted form Adams TL, Marchiori DM. Chapter 9 – Arthritides. In: DM Marchiori, editor. Clinical imaging. 3rd ed. Mosby, United States. 2014; p. 476–624. ISBN 9780323084956. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-08495-6.00009-9 ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; CRP, C-reactive protein; DIP, distal interphalangeal joint; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; F, female; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; M, male; MCP, metacarpophalangeal joint; MTP, metatarsophalangeal joint; OA, osteoarthritis; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joint; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SI, sacroiliac joint; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide. When approaching musculoskeletal pain, differentiating between articular and non-articular or diffuse pain narrows the differential, and this is based on history and examination (Figure 1). Articular pain in comparison to non-articular pain is more diffuse and present in both active and passive movements, while non-articular pain is usually localised to the affected structure (e.g. muscle, tendon, bursa, fascia, nerve or bone) and usually limits active rather than passive movements. In non-articular pain joint crepitus, deformity or instability is absent but muscle weakness and wasting may be present.[8,9,10]
FIGURE 1

Approach to musculoskeletal pain.[8,9,10]

Approach to musculoskeletal pain.[8,9,10]

Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a clinical syndrome of joint pain that is accompanied by varying degrees of functional restriction, reduced quality of life and lack of psychosocial well-being.[11,12] It is the most common form of degenerative arthritis and one of the leading causes of pain and disability worldwide.[1,11] Damage to the cartilage causes the tissues within the joint to become active, altering its structure, resulting in pain, stiffness and restricted range of movement. Osteophytes develop at the edge of the joint while the synovium thickens and fluid accumulation causes swelling (Figure 2).[13]
FIGURE 2

Osteoarthritis pathological findings.[14] (a) A joint with mild Osteoarthritis and (b) a joint that has been deformed by severe Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis pathological findings.[14] (a) A joint with mild Osteoarthritis and (b) a joint that has been deformed by severe Osteoarthritis.

Symptoms and signs

The main symptoms of osteoarthritis are pain and sometimes stiffness in the affected joints. The pain tends to be worse when the joint is moved or at the end of the day. Stiffness occurs at rest and usually improves with activity.[15] The swelling may be hard and knobbly, which is caused by the growth of extra bone, or it may be soft, which may be caused by the thickening of the synovium and extra fluid inside the joint capsule.[16] Crepitus is a common sign of osteoarthritis. Muscle wasting around a joint is a late feature.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of osteoarthritis is predominantly clinical based on a good history and physical examination. Plain radiological procedures may confirm diagnosis or rule out other medical conditions.[17]

Management

The management of osteoarthritis encompasses both pharmacological and non-pharmacological options involving the patient in decision-making that incorporates adherence and self-management. Key non-pharmacological interventions include arthritis education, land-based exercise programmes and weight reduction. Optional non-pharmacological interventions include heat therapy, manipulation and massage, transelectrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and water-based exercises. These can be tried according to patient preferences and stopped if found to be ineffective.[18] The popularity of paracetamol has decreased with new studies questioning the safety profile in comparison to the minimal efficacy it produces.[19] However, it is reasonable to trial paracetamol at a dose of up to 3 g/day and discontinue if no response is achieved. Topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) form the backbone of pharmacological interventions for osteoarthritis. While all NSAIDS share similar efficacy, individual sensitivities may differ. In principle, the lowest dose should be used for the shortest period of time to achieve a clinical response to balance the risk of long-term use. Comorbid conditions should be factored in when prescribing NSAIDS as they are cardiotoxic, nephrotoxic and cause peptic ulceration.[20] The conditions for co-prescribing NSAIDS with a PPI and using a selective COX-2 inhibitor are outlined in Figure 3.
FIGURE 3

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for knee osteoarthritis.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for knee osteoarthritis. Opioids provide marginal efficacy for joint pain but carry a serious risk of abuse, tramadol can be used in certain instances, while other opioids in general should be avoided. Intra-articular steroids are of significant benefit during an acute flare for short-term pain relief. However, repeated injections may result in rapid cartilage loss with no long-term benefit and hence judicious use is warranted.[21] Figure 4 compares four international guidelines for osteoarthritis management of the knee. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) published guidelines in 2012 for knee, hand and hip osteoarthritis.[18] The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) in 2013 laid out guidelines for non-surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee.[22] The Australian guidelines (Royal Australian College of General Practitioners [RACGP])[23] in 2018 covered hip and knee OA and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) published its latest guidelines in November 2019.[24]
FIGURE 4

Summary of international recommendations for knee osteoarthritis management.

Summary of international recommendations for knee osteoarthritis management.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic autoimmune condition, which causes pain, swelling and stiffness of multiple joints of the body.[25] Tiredness, lack of energy, weight loss, fever, sweating and dry eyes may manifest with systemic involvement. Clinical features are outlined in Table 1. Autoimmunity and overall systemic and articular inflammation are responsible for the destructive progression of the disease.[26] Joint capsule instability results as the surrounding joint ligaments become weakened and stretched (Figure 5).[27]
FIGURE 5

Pathological features of rheumatoid arthritis.[14]

Pathological features of rheumatoid arthritis.[14] Assessment of the patient is based on clinical history and physical examination. The pain of arthritis is the factor that causes patients to frequently seek healthcare. Characteristics such as location, quantity, intensity, nature and the course of pain can assist diagnosis. Other symptoms of arthritis include stiffness, limited motion, fatigue, weakness and swollen joints. The latter can be assessed by inspection or by direct palpation of the joint. A count of the number of swollen joints provides an indication of the amount of inflamed tissue. Use of diaries could prove a useful adjunct to traditional methods of pain assessment (e.g. visual analogue scales) and can incorporate ratings of stiffness, fatigue and mood.[27] Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment or referral to a physician is key in the prevention of severe disability and the loss of quality of life.[27] A joint working group of the ACR and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) developed updated criteria to assist in making diagnoses earlier (Table 2).[26] Application of these criteria provides a score of 0–10, with a score of 6 or more out of 10 being indicative of the presence of definite RA.
TABLE 2

The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.[26]

CriteriaScore
A. Joint involvement (0–5)
1 large joint0
2−10 large joints1
1−3 small joints (with or without involvement of large joints)2
4−10 small joints (with or without involvement of large joints)3
> 10 joints (at least 1 small joint)5
B. Serology (0–3)
Negative RF and negative ACPA0
Low-positive RF or low-positive ACPA2
High-positive RF or high-positive ACPA3
C. Acute-phase reactants (0–1)
Normal CRP and normal ESR0
Abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR1
D. Duration of symptoms (0–1)
< 6 weeks0
≥ 6 weeks1

Source: Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–2581. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584

Note: Add score of A to D, a score of ≥ 6/10 needed for classification of RA.

ACR, American College of Rheumatology; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; ACPA, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RF, rheumatoid factor.

The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.[26] Source: Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–2581. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584 Note: Add score of A to D, a score of ≥ 6/10 needed for classification of RA. ACR, American College of Rheumatology; CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; ACPA, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RF, rheumatoid factor. General laboratory tests can help determine whether arthritis and its treatment have affected major body systems. A full blood count may reveal the presence of anaemia of chronic disease, a common feature of arthritis. Neutropenia is often associated with severe RA. Liver function tests and viral serology are essential prior to commencement of treatment.[26] In RA, 80% of patients will test positive for rheumatoid factor. Positive rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody tests are associated with increased disease severity, the development of erosions, extra-articular manifestation and greater disability. Levels of acute phase reactants (e.g. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) are used to monitor disease activity.[23,25] Radiography, or X-rays, is helpful both diagnostically and in monitoring the disease progression.

Management of rheumatoid arthritis

The management of RA has changed dramatically over the past 30 years.[28] The fundamental principles revolve around disease control within 3–6 months, with the goal being remission or a low disease activity state.[28] The 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations is based on recent evidence in the area of RA management.[29] The principles explain the importance of early referral to a rheumatologist (or family physician or internal medicine consultant in settings with restricted access, such as the South African district health system) so that targeted therapy can be initiated based on the principles of monitoring disease activity and shared decision-making. The recommended target is to reach a state of sustained remission or low disease activity using standardised scoring systems like the disease activity 28 joint score (DAS28). Methotrexate (MTX) is the initial drug of choice if not contraindicated. It is a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD). A trial period of 3 to 6 months is the goal before treatment is adjusted according to the degree of improvement. A second-line drug like another csDMARD (e.g. leflunomide or sulphasalazine) may be added in the presence of poor prognostic factors. Biological drugs (e.g. etanercept) may be added to csDMARDS until remission before the former is weaned off and then the latter. Biologicals should be co-prescribed with a csDMARD in most cases. It is not advisable to combine two biologicals. Once remission is obtained, first wean off the biological and then the csDMARD. A multidisciplinary approach through networking with allied health disciplines like physiotherapy, occupational therapy, podiatry and dietetics is essential to reach goal-orientated targets.[8] Patient education directed at strengthening social and emotional support to enhance self-management of pain and disability as well as adherence to health recommendations is essential.[25]

Summary

The basic management for some of the other common arthritis is detailed in Table 3.
TABLE 3

Management of other arthritides.

ArthritisTherapeutic Options
SLE Hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids; if they fail, MTX or AZA; biological – Belimumab[30]
Ankylosing spondylitis NSAIDS
TNF Inhibitors, for example, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab
IL17 inhibitors – secukinumab, ixekizumab[31]
Psoriatic arthritis TNF inhibitor biologics
Oral small molecules – MTX, SSZ, CYC
IL12/23i – ustekinumab
IL17 inhibitors
Smoking cessation[32]
Reiter’s syndrome Acute – NSAIDS
Chronic stage – DMARDS (SSZ, MTX)
Biologics – etanercept, adalimumab
Gout Acute attack – NSAIDS, systemic steroids if cannot tolerate, or no response use colchicine
Recurrent attacks (2 or more/year), tophi, urate arthropathy or kidney failure – urate-lowering therapy with allopurinol (caution – nephrotoxic) use probenecid[33]
Bacterial Drainage of infected fluid
Antibiotics
Joint immobilisation
Viral Treat the cause
NSAIDS

AZA, azathioprine; CYC, cyclosporine; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; IL, interleukin; MTX, methotrexate; NSAIDs, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; SSZ, salazopyrin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Management of other arthritides. AZA, azathioprine; CYC, cyclosporine; DMARDs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; IL, interleukin; MTX, methotrexate; NSAIDs, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; SSZ, salazopyrin; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

Conclusion

While arthritis is common and the differential diagnosis is broad, having a well-rounded approach and holistically managing a patient, including timely referral for the inflammatory forms of arthritis, will result in better patient outcomes, better quality of life and decreased morbidity.
  25 in total

1.  South African recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: an algorithm for the standard of care in 2013.

Authors:  Bridget Hodkinson; Elsa Van Duuren; Clive Pettipher; Asgar Kalla
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2013-06-14

Review 2.  American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Roy D Altman; Karine Toupin April; Maria Benkhalti; Gordon Guyatt; Jessie McGowan; Tanveer Towheed; Vivian Welch; George Wells; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  George Bertsias; Dimitrios T Boumpas; Antonis Fanouriakis; Myrto Kostopoulou; Alessia Alunno; Martin Aringer; Ingeborg Bajema; John N Boletis; Ricard Cervera; Andrea Doria; Caroline Gordon; Marcello Govoni; Frédéric Houssiau; David Jayne; Marios Kouloumas; Annegret Kuhn; Janni L Larsen; Kirsten Lerstrøm; Gabriella Moroni; Marta Mosca; Matthias Schneider; Josef S Smolen; Elisabet Svenungsson; Vladimir Tesar; Angela Tincani; Anne Troldborg; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Jörg Wenzel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: literature update.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Differential Diagnosis of Polyarticular Arthritis.

Authors:  George G A Pujalte; Sheila A Albano-Aluquin
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  Various Types of Arthritis in the United States: Prevalence and Age-Related Trends From 1999 to 2014.

Authors:  Juyoung Park; Angelico Mendy; Edgar R Vieira
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Impact of disablement due to rheumatic disorders in a British population: estimates of severity and prevalence from the Calderdale Rheumatic Disablement Survey.

Authors:  E M Badley; A Tennant
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Robert Landewé; Johannes Bijlsma; Gerd Burmester; Katerina Chatzidionysiou; Maxime Dougados; Jackie Nam; Sofia Ramiro; Marieke Voshaar; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Daniel Aletaha; Martin Aringer; Maarten Boers; Chris D Buckley; Frank Buttgereit; Vivian Bykerk; Mario Cardiel; Bernard Combe; Maurizio Cutolo; Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings; Paul Emery; Axel Finckh; Cem Gabay; Juan Gomez-Reino; Laure Gossec; Jacques-Eric Gottenberg; Johanna M W Hazes; Tom Huizinga; Meghna Jani; Dmitry Karateev; Marios Kouloumas; Tore Kvien; Zhanguo Li; Xavier Mariette; Iain McInnes; Eduardo Mysler; Peter Nash; Karel Pavelka; Gyula Poór; Christophe Richez; Piet van Riel; Andrea Rubbert-Roth; Kenneth Saag; Jose da Silva; Tanja Stamm; Tsutomu Takeuchi; René Westhovens; Maarten de Wit; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Atul Deodhar; Lianne S Gensler; Maureen Dubreuil; David Yu; Muhammad Asim Khan; Nigil Haroon; David Borenstein; Runsheng Wang; Ann Biehl; Meika A Fang; Grant Louie; Vikas Majithia; Bernard Ng; Rosemary Bigham; Michael Pianin; Amit Aakash Shah; Nancy Sullivan; Marat Turgunbaev; Jeff Oristaglio; Amy Turner; Walter P Maksymowych; Liron Caplan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 15.483

Review 10.  Paracetamol: not as safe as we thought? A systematic literature review of observational studies.

Authors:  Emmert Roberts; Vanessa Delgado Nunes; Sara Buckner; Susan Latchem; Margaret Constanti; Paul Miller; Michael Doherty; Weiya Zhang; Fraser Birrell; Mark Porcheret; Krysia Dziedzic; Ian Bernstein; Elspeth Wise; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.