Literature DB >> 32146547

DNA methylation age acceleration is associated with ALS age of onset and survival.

Ming Zhang1,2,3,4, Paul M McKeever5,6, Zhengrui Xi7,8, Danielle Moreno5, Christine Sato5, Tessa Bergsma5, Philip McGoldrick5,6, Julia Keith6,9, Janice Robertson5,6, Lorne Zinman10,11, Ekaterina Rogaeva12,13.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146547      PMCID: PMC7181538          DOI: 10.1007/s00401-020-02131-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


× No keyword cloud information.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, including C9orf72-carriers and identical twins [1], have highly variable disease characteristics (e.g., duration and age/site of onset) [7], suggesting the influence of epigenetic variations. DNA methylation (DNAm) is a key epigenetic modification and linked to the risk of several neurodegenerative diseases (Supplementary introduction). The cumulative assessment of DNAm levels at age-related CpGs allows the estimation of multi-tissue DNAm age (epigenetic clock), which could be more accurate for assessing biological age than chronological age. Hypermethylation of the CpG-island 5′ of the C9orf72-repeat and DNAm-age acceleration have been reported to be associated with C9orf72-disease duration and age of onset [9, 10]. However, epigenetic modifiers in genetically unexplained ALS patients are largely unknown. Hence, we conducted a genome-wide investigation of DNAm (Infinium MethylationEPIC chip) in samples from blood (n = 249) or tissues from the central nervous system (CNS) (n = 18) of mainly sporadic ALS patients (Table 1), and assessed the association of DNAm-age acceleration with disease age of onset and survival (Supplementary methods). Considering the reported 3-year error for estimating DNAm age, we classified the patients into three groups: normal aging (n = 82, DNAm-age acceleration between − 3 and 3 years, median = 0.5 years), slow aging (n = 125, DNAm-age acceleration < − 3 years, median = − 6.3 years), and fast aging (n = 42, DNAm-age acceleration > 3 years, median = 5.7 years).
Table 1

Sample characteristics of the ALS cohort

Characteristics of ALS patientsBloodCNS cohorta
Sporadic ALS cases (n)20017
Familial ALS cases (n)491
Sex (male, n %)148, 59.4%13, 72.2%
Age of onset (years)
 Mean5959
 Range16–8731–79
Site of onset (n, %)
 Bulbar67, 27%4, 22.2%
 Limb172, 73%14, 77.8%

aFrontal cortex and cervical spinal cord from the central nervous system (CNS)

Sample characteristics of the ALS cohort aFrontal cortex and cervical spinal cord from the central nervous system (CNS) Multivariate linear regression analysis detected a highly significant association between blood-based DNAm-age acceleration and ALS age of onset (adjusted p value = 2.2E-16, B = − 1.29, R2 = 0.33, n = 249) (Supplementary methods, Fig. 1a), suggesting that for every 5-year increase in DNAm-age acceleration there is a 6.4-year earlier onset. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a faster DNAm-age acceleration is significantly associated with an earlier age of onset [adjusted p value = 9.3E-16, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.76–2.54], suggesting that the hazard increased by 112% (Fig. 1c). The median age of onset in the fast aging group (48 years; 95%CI: 42–51) was 18 years younger than the slow aging group (66 years; 95%CI: 63–68). Significant results were not driven by subgroups stratified by sex or site of onset (Figs. S2–S3, Fig. S6).
Fig. 1

DNAm-age acceleration is significantly associated with ALS age of onset and survival. a Scatter plot showing the association between blood-based DNAm-age acceleration and age of onset (adjusted p value = 2.2E-16, B = − 1.29, R2 = 0.33; blood cell abundance adjusted p value = 2E-16, B = − 1.22, R2 = 0.47, n = 249). The solid line represents the linear regression trend. b Scatter plot showing the association between CNS-based DNAm-age acceleration and age of onset. Tissues were obtained from 18 ALS cases: frontal cortex (FC) (adjusted p value = 8.4E-4, B = − 1.73, R2 = 0.48), and cervical spinal cord (CSC) (adjusted p value = 3.67E-5, B = − 1.69, R2 = 0.65). The solid line represents the linear regression trend. c Kaplan–Meier curve of cumulative incidence of ALS age of onset (n = 249) stratified into three groups based on blood-based DNAm-age acceleration (adjusted p value = 9.3E-16, HR = 2.12; 95%CI: 1.76–2.54; blood cell abundance adjusted p value = 5.3E-12, HR = 2.39, 95%CI: 1.86–3.06). d Kaplan–Meier curve of survival probability (n = 244) stratified into three aging groups based on blood-based DNAm-age acceleration (adjusted p value = 1.7E-7, HR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.58–2.72; blood cell abundance adjusted p value = 4.4E-8, HR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.66–2.93). Slow aging: DNAm-age acceleration <  − 3 years, normal aging: DNAm-age acceleration between − 3 and 3 years, and fast aging: DNAm-age acceleration > 3 years. AA represents DNAm-age acceleration

DNAm-age acceleration is significantly associated with ALS age of onset and survival. a Scatter plot showing the association between blood-based DNAm-age acceleration and age of onset (adjusted p value = 2.2E-16, B = − 1.29, R2 = 0.33; blood cell abundance adjusted p value = 2E-16, B = − 1.22, R2 = 0.47, n = 249). The solid line represents the linear regression trend. b Scatter plot showing the association between CNS-based DNAm-age acceleration and age of onset. Tissues were obtained from 18 ALS cases: frontal cortex (FC) (adjusted p value = 8.4E-4, B = − 1.73, R2 = 0.48), and cervical spinal cord (CSC) (adjusted p value = 3.67E-5, B = − 1.69, R2 = 0.65). The solid line represents the linear regression trend. c Kaplan–Meier curve of cumulative incidence of ALS age of onset (n = 249) stratified into three groups based on blood-based DNAm-age acceleration (adjusted p value = 9.3E-16, HR = 2.12; 95%CI: 1.76–2.54; blood cell abundance adjusted p value = 5.3E-12, HR = 2.39, 95%CI: 1.86–3.06). d Kaplan–Meier curve of survival probability (n = 244) stratified into three aging groups based on blood-based DNAm-age acceleration (adjusted p value = 1.7E-7, HR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.58–2.72; blood cell abundance adjusted p value = 4.4E-8, HR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.66–2.93). Slow aging: DNAm-age acceleration <  − 3 years, normal aging: DNAm-age acceleration between − 3 and 3 years, and fast aging: DNAm-age acceleration > 3 years. AA represents DNAm-age acceleration Furthermore, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a faster DNAm-age acceleration was significantly associated with a shorter survival with an increased hazard of 107% (adjusted p value = 1.7E-7, HR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.58–2.72) (Supplementary methods, Fig. 1d). The median survival age was 10 years shorter in the fast aging group (65 years; 95%CI: 54–70) than the slow aging group (75 years; 95%CI: 74–77). We replicated this observation by re-analyzing DNAm data from our previous study of 30 C9orf72 patients [10], and found that the median survival age was 15 years shorter in the fast vs slow aging group (adjusted p value = 0.01, HR = 3.5; 95%CI: 1.3–9.3), suggesting that the hazard increased by 250% (Fig. S1). The significant findings were not driven by subgroups stratified by sex or site of onset (Fig. S4–S6). Previously, we reported that CNS-based DNAm-age acceleration is significantly associated with C9orf72-disease age of onset and duration, using DNA from frontal cortex (FC) and cervical spinal cord (CSC) [10]. To evaluate this association in genetically unexplained ALS patients, we investigated DNA isolated from FC and CSC tissues of 18 ALS cases. Even with the modest CNS sample size, DNAm-age acceleration is associated with age of onset in DNA from FC (adjusted p value = 8.4E-4, B = − 1.73, R2 = 0.48); and CSC (adjusted p value = 3.7E-5, B = − 1.69, R2 = 0.65) (Fig. 1b). The linear regression model suggests that a 5-year increase in CNS-based DNAm-age acceleration is linked to an 8.4–8.7 year earlier onset. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis suggests that CNS-based DNAm-age acceleration is significantly associated with survival (FC: p value = 0.006; CSC: p value = 0.0009) (Fig. S7). As expected for a multi-tissue epigenetic clock, there was no significant difference in DNAm-age acceleration between the two CNS tissues (p value = 0.13; Fig. S8). Since ALS is often associated with mixed pathologies [2], we evaluated if FC pathology (tau or TDP-43 inclusions, Table S1) may affect our findings. However, a subgroup analysis of patients with (n = 5) or without (n = 13) FC pathology found no significant difference in DNAm-age acceleration (p value = 0.78, Fig. S9). Locus-by-locus analysis of blood DNAm levels of 835,424 CpGs (not overlapping known genetic polymorphisms) found no CpGs associated with age of onset at the genome-wide significant level in 249 ALS patients (Fig. S10, Table S2–S3). Cumulatively, our study revealed that blood/CNS-based DNAm-age acceleration is significantly associated with age of onset and survival in genetically unexplained ALS patients, suggesting a novel epigenetic modifier. In C9orf72 patients, we observed a trend for a stronger association of survival with DNAm-age acceleration vs a general ALS cohort, but with a much broader 95%CI (likely due to the modest size of the C9orf72 cohort; n = 30). DNAm-age acceleration was comparable between the two investigated CNS tissues; however, we observed a tendency for a stronger association of DNAm-age acceleration with age of onset in CNS vs non-autopsy blood samples. Both trends should be clarified by analyzing a larger sample set in the future (Supplementary discussion). Our findings strongly support the use of DNAm-age acceleration as a biomarker of biological aging. The epigenetic clock may also be used to stratify results obtained in clinical trials (e.g., response to treatment in the fast vs slow aging groups). Notably, a recent pilot study reported using the epigenetic clock in a clinical trial intended to regenerate the thymus to prevent signs of immunosenescence [3], encouraging the use of the epigenetic clock to estimate the effectiveness of aging interventions. The molecular mechanism underlying the epigenetic clock and its link to disease presentation is largely unknown. Age-related CpGs are mapped to promoter, enhancer and polycomb protein-binding regions [4]. Aberrant DNAm in these regions may regulate gene expression involved in key biological processes (cell growth/proliferation and death/survival [5]). Future studies could also clarify the association between DNAm-age acceleration and other ALS phenotypes (e.g., severity), or in ALS patients with other mutations (e.g., in SOD1), and different neurodegenerative phenotypes in the longitudinal Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative cohort [6] and the Dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease cohort [8] (Supplementary discussion). Hence, DNAm-age acceleration may be used as an aging biomarker in future clinical trials to predict the effect of drugs on modulating ALS age of onset or survival. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 3758 kb)
  10 in total

Review 1.  The phenotypic variability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Bart Swinnen; Wim Robberecht
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  An estimate of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis heritability using twin data.

Authors:  A Al-Chalabi; F Fang; M F Hanby; P N Leigh; C E Shaw; W Ye; F Rijsdijk
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 13.654

3.  Hypermethylation of the CpG island near the G4C2 repeat in ALS with a C9orf72 expansion.

Authors:  Zhengrui Xi; Lorne Zinman; Danielle Moreno; Jennifer Schymick; Yan Liang; Christine Sato; Yonglan Zheng; Mahdi Ghani; Samar Dib; Julia Keith; Janice Robertson; Ekaterina Rogaeva
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Comorbidities.

Authors:  Irina Alafuzoff; Gabor G Kovacs
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2017

Review 5.  DNA Methylation Clocks in Aging: Categories, Causes, and Consequences.

Authors:  Adam E Field; Neil A Robertson; Tina Wang; Aaron Havas; Trey Ideker; Peter D Adams
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Presymptomatic cognitive and neuroanatomical changes in genetic frontotemporal dementia in the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI) study: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; Jennifer M Nicholas; David M Cash; John van Swieten; Elise Dopper; Lize Jiskoot; Rick van Minkelen; Serge A Rombouts; M Jorge Cardoso; Shona Clegg; Miklos Espak; Simon Mead; David L Thomas; Enrico De Vita; Mario Masellis; Sandra E Black; Morris Freedman; Ron Keren; Bradley J MacIntosh; Ekaterina Rogaeva; David Tang-Wai; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Robert Laforce; Fabrizio Tagliavini; Pietro Tiraboschi; Veronica Redaelli; Sara Prioni; Marina Grisoli; Barbara Borroni; Alessandro Padovani; Daniela Galimberti; Elio Scarpini; Andrea Arighi; Giorgio Fumagalli; James B Rowe; Ian Coyle-Gilchrist; Caroline Graff; Marie Fallström; Vesna Jelic; Anne Kinhult Ståhlbom; Christin Andersson; Håkan Thonberg; Lena Lilius; Giovanni B Frisoni; Michela Pievani; Martina Bocchetta; Luisa Benussi; Roberta Ghidoni; Elizabeth Finger; Sandro Sorbi; Benedetta Nacmias; Gemma Lombardi; Cristina Polito; Jason D Warren; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox; Martin N Rossor; Giuliano Binetti
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 7.  Neurological manifestations of autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of the published literature with the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network observational study (DIAN-OBS).

Authors:  Mengxuan Tang; Davis C Ryman; Eric McDade; Mateusz S Jasielec; Virginia D Buckles; Nigel J Cairns; Anne M Fagan; Alison Goate; Daniel S Marcus; Chengjie Xiong; Ricardo F Allegri; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Adrian Danek; Martin R Farlow; Nick C Fox; Bernardino Ghetti; Neill R Graff-Radford; Christopher Laske; Ralph N Martins; Colin L Masters; Richard P Mayeux; John M Ringman; Martin N Rossor; Stephen P Salloway; Peter R Schofield; John C Morris; Randall J Bateman
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.

Authors:  Steve Horvath
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  DNA methylation age-acceleration is associated with disease duration and age at onset in C9orf72 patients.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Maria Carmela Tartaglia; Danielle Moreno; Christine Sato; Paul McKeever; Anna Weichert; Julia Keith; Janice Robertson; Lorne Zinman; Ekaterina Rogaeva
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Reversal of epigenetic aging and immunosenescent trends in humans.

Authors:  Gregory M Fahy; Robert T Brooke; James P Watson; Zinaida Good; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Holden Maecker; Michael D Leipold; David T S Lin; Michael S Kobor; Steve Horvath
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 9.304

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Gene expression and epigenetic markers of prion diseases.

Authors:  Emmanuelle A Viré; Simon Mead
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Combined epigenetic/genetic study identified an ALS age of onset modifier.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Zhengrui Xi; Sara Saez-Atienzar; Ruth Chia; Danielle Moreno; Christine Sato; Mahdi Montazer Haghighi; Bryan J Traynor; Lorne Zinman; Ekaterina Rogaeva
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 7.801

3.  Age-related demethylation of the TDP-43 autoregulatory region in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Yuka Koike; Akihiro Sugai; Norikazu Hara; Junko Ito; Akio Yokoseki; Tomohiko Ishihara; Takuma Yamagishi; Shintaro Tsuboguchi; Mari Tada; Takeshi Ikeuchi; Akiyoshi Kakita; Osamu Onodera
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-09-21

4.  Altered DNA methylation profiles in blood from patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Authors:  Luke C Dabin; Fernando Guntoro; Tracy Campbell; Tony Bélicard; Adam R Smith; Rebecca G Smith; Rachel Raybould; Jonathan M Schott; Katie Lunnon; Peter Sarkies; John Collinge; Simon Mead; Emmanuelle Viré
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 17.088

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.