Literature DB >> 32146464

Peritoneal Dialysis as an Urgent-Start Option for Incident Patients on Chronic Renal Replacement Therapy: World Experience and Review of Literature.

Dayana Bittencourt Dias1,2, Marcela Lara Mendes2, Camila Albuquerque Alves2, Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori1, Daniela Ponce3,4.   

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease is a significant problem of public health worldwide, and up to 60% of patients start dialysis in an unplanned manner without a definitive dialysis access. Recently, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as an alternative to unplanned chronic dialytic method, and the world collective experience shows that PD can be an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with comparable outcomes to the planned PD and urgent-start hemodialysis (HD). More importantly, as compared to urgent-start HD using a central venous catheter, urgent-start PD has significantly fewer incidences of catheter-related bloodstream infections, dialysis-related mechanical complications, and need for dialysis catheter reinsertions during the initial time of the therapy. An integrative review was conducted on PD urgent start compared to HD urgent start and to planned PD, identifying its potential advantages and limitations. Literature search was performed within multiple databases, and observational studies on clinical experience with urgent PD were reviewed and appraised.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic kidney disease; Hemodialysis; Mortality; Peritoneal dialysis; Urgent start

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146464     DOI: 10.1159/000506505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  1 in total

1.  Urgent vs. early-start peritoneal dialysis: patients' profile and outcomes.

Authors:  Viviane Calice-Silva; Bruna C Tonial; Helen C Ferreira; Fabiana B Nerbass
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.