Literature DB >> 32146393

Measuring exposure of e-waste dismantlers in Dhaka Bangladesh to organophosphate esters and halogenated flame retardants using silicone wristbands and T-shirts.

Yan Wang1, Andrea Peris2, Mohammad Rashidujjaman Rifat3, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed3, Nirupam Aich4, Linh V Nguyen5, Jakub Urík6, Ethel Eljarrat2, Branislav Vrana6, Liisa M Jantunen7, Miriam L Diamond8.   

Abstract

Silicone (polydimethylsiloxane or PDMS) wristbands and cotton T-shirts were used to assess the exposure of e-waste recyclers in Dhaka, Bangladesh to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), dechlorane plus (DPs), and organophosphate esters (OPEs). The median surface-normalized uptake rates of PBDEs, NBFRs, DPs, and OPEs were 170, 8.5, 4.8, and 270 ng/dm2/h for wristbands and 5.4, 2.0, 0.94, and 23 ng/dm2/h for T-shirts, respectively. Concentrations of Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP), Tri-m-cresyl phosphate (TmCP), Bis(2-ethlyhexyl) tetrabromophthalate (BEH-TEBP), and Dechlorane plus (DPs) in wristbands were significantly correlated with those in T-shirts. Wristbands accumulated ~7 times more mass than T-shirts, especially of compounds expected to be mainly in the gas phase. We introduce the silicone "sandwich" method to approximate the easily releasable fraction (ERF) from T-shirts, hypothesized to be related to dermal exposure. ERFs varied from 6 to 75% of total chemical accumulated by T-shirts and were significantly negatively correlated with compounds' octanol-air partition coefficient (log Koa). The median daily exposure doses via dermal transfer from the front of the T-shirt to the front body trunk were 0.32, 0.13, 0.11, and 9.1 ng/kg-BW/day for PBDEs, NBFRs, DPs, and OPEs, respectively. The evidence of e-waste recycler exposure to flame retardants in this low income country, lacking protective personal equipment, calls for measures to minimize their exposure and for chemical management regulations to consider exposures to chemicals in waste products.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dermal uptake; E-waste; Flame retardants; Human exposure; Silicone wristband; T-shirt

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146393     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

Review 1.  Operationalizing the Exposome Using Passive Silicone Samplers.

Authors:  Zoe Coates Fuentes; Yuri Levin Schwartz; Anna R Robuck; Douglas I Walker
Journal:  Curr Pollut Rep       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 2.  Silicone Wristbands in Exposure Assessment: Analytical Considerations and Comparison with Other Approaches.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wacławik; Wojciech Rodzaj; Bartosz Wielgomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Environmental impact and health risk assessment of potentially toxic metals emanating from different anthropogenic activities related to E-wastes.

Authors:  Adeniyi Abiodun Adenuga; Olufemi David Amos; Oluwatobi Deborah Olajide; Adebayo Oluwole Eludoyin; Oluwatope Olaniyi Idowu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-20

Review 4.  A systematic review of the use of silicone wristbands for environmental exposure assessment, with a focus on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  Laila Hamzai; Nicolas Lopez Galvez; Eunha Hoh; Nathan G Dodder; Georg E Matt; Penelope J Quintana
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Determining chemical air equivalency using silicone personal monitors.

Authors:  Steven G O'Connell; Kim A Anderson; Marc I Epstein
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.563

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.