| Literature DB >> 32146320 |
Gavin P Winston1, Sjoerd B Vos2, Benoit Caldairou3, Seok-Jun Hong3, Monika Czech4, Tobias C Wood5, Stephen J Wastling6, Gareth J Barker5, Boris C Bernhardt7, Neda Bernasconi3, John S Duncan4, Andrea Bernasconi3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous imaging studies in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) have examined the spatial distribution of changes in imaging parameters such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and cortical thickness. Multi-compartment models offer greater specificity with parameters more directly related to known changes in TLE such as altered neuronal density and myelination. We studied the spatial distribution of conventional and novel metrics including neurite density derived from NODDI (Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging) and myelin water fraction (MWF) derived from mcDESPOT (Multi-Compartment Driven Equilibrium Single Pulse Observation of T1/T2)] to infer the underlying neurobiology of changes in conventional metrics.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion imaging; Multi-compartment models; Myelination; Neurite density; Temporal lobe epilepsy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32146320 PMCID: PMC7063236 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics.
| Subject | Age/Gender | Age at onset | Duration | MRI | EEG | Other | Pathology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33F | 9y | 24y | R HS | R TL (ii, i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 2 | 30F | 4y | 26y | R HS | R TL (ii, i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 3 | 58M | 51y | 7y | R HS | R TL (ii, i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 4 | 34M | 7y | 27y | R HS | R TL (ii, i) | icEEG – R MTL | HS (ILAE type I) |
| 5 | 23M | 17y | 7y | L HS | L TL (ii, i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 6 | 30M | 24y | 6y | R HS | R TL (ii, i), also L frontopolar (ii) | PET – normal, icEEG – R ant hippocampus | HS (ILAE type I) |
| 7 | 48F | 4y | 44y | L HS | L TL (ii, i) | Declined surgery | |
| 8 | 47F | 9m | 47y | L HS + cerebellar infarct | Declined surgery | ||
| 9 | 30M | 24y | 6y | L HS + precuneus lesion | L TL (ii), L hemisphere (i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 10 | 36F | 27y | 9y | R HS | R TL (ii,i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 11 | 57M | 44y | 13y | R HS | Nil (ii), R TL (i) | Declined surgery | |
| 12 | 50M | 24y | 26y | L HS | L TL (ii, i) | Declined surgery | |
| 13 | 31M | 22y | 9y | R HS | icEEG – R hippocampus | Declined surgery | |
| 14 | 33M | 26y | 7y | R HS | R TL (ii, i) | HS (ILAE type I) | |
| 15 | 31F | 6y | 25y | Normal | R TL (i) | PET – R TL | Declined surgery |
| 16 | 38M | 13y | 25y | Normal | PET – R TL | Declined icEEG | |
| 17 | 26F | 4y | 22y | Normal | PET – R TL | Undergoing investigation | |
| 18 | 48F | 41y | 7y | Normal | R TL (ii, i) | PET – normal | Unsuitable for icEEG |
| 19 | 35F | 19y | 16y | Normal | B TL (ii), L TL (i) | PET – L TL | Declined icEEG |
| 20 | 24M | 7y | 17y | Normal | L TL (ii, i) | PET – L TL | Unsuitable for icEEG |
Hippocampal volumes and T2 relaxometry.
| Hippocampal volumes (cm3) | Hippocampal T2 values (ms) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral | Contralateral (controls - R) | Ipsilateral | Contralateral (controls - R) | |
| Controls ( | 2.868 (0.193) | 2.930 (0.214) | 112.6 (3.3) | 113.4 (3.6) |
| Patients ( | 2.305 (0.567) | 2.850 (0.257) | 124.1 (8.0) | 115.6 (3.3) |
| Patients with HS ( | 1.998 (0.316) | 2.808 (0.2540 | 126.7 (8.1) | 115.8 (3.7) |
| Patients without HS ( | 3.021 (0.286) | 2.948 (0.259) | 118.0 (2.7) | 115.1 (2.5) |
Hippocampal volumes (corrected for intracranial volume) and hippocampal T2 relaxation times are given for each group as mean (sd). In the patient subgroups, the p values from a Student's t-test comparing against each group against all control hippocampi is given.
Fig. 1Image processing framework. Grey matter-white matter and grey matter-CSF cortical surfaces were extracted from the T1-weighted image (top, cyan and blue respectively) and midcortical and 2 mm subcortical surfaces were generated using a Laplacian potential (top, red and green respectively). These surfaces were registered to diffusion and DESPOT space using the FA image (middle left) and IR-SPGR (middle right) respectively. Measurements from diffusion and DESPOT scans were sampled along these surfaces (bottom). Examples of mean values in patients on the two surfaces are shown for diffusion (FA, MD, ICVF) and DESPOT (MWF) scans.
Fig. 2Intracortical grey matter (main and regression findings). Group comparisons show that in patients mean diffusivity was increased in ipsilateral temporal and frontopolar regions (A) whilst reduced neurite density was more confined to mesial and basal temporal regions (B). Linear regression showed that increased mean diffusivity was related to both CSF fraction (C) and neurite density (D). Uncorrected p-values shown for significant clusters (defined by FWE 0.05, cluster threshold 0.01).
Fig. 3Subcortical white matter (main findings). Group comparisons show that in patients, bilateral reductions in FA were observed in temporal and frontopolar regions (A) with a similar distribution of increased RD (B) and reduced neurite density (C). Reduced myelin fraction (D) was more confined to the ipsilateral temporal lobe. Uncorrected p-values shown for significant clusters (defined by FWE 0.05, cluster threshold 0.01).
Fig. 4Subcortical white matter (regression findings). Linear regression showed that reduced FA in the ipsilateral temporal lobe is associated with axonal loss (A) with an additional relationship to altered myelination in the temporal pole and anterolateral temporal neocortex (B). A similar pattern was observed for the increase in RD (C,D). Neurite density in the temporal pole was more reduced with longer disease duration (E, shown with an outlier removed). Uncorrected p-values shown for significant clusters (defined by FWE 0.05, cluster threshold 0.01).