Literature DB >> 32146134

Evaluation of naloxone access, pricing, and barriers to dispensing in Tennessee retail community pharmacies.

Christina A Spivey, Angelica Wilder, Marie A Chisholm-Burns, Sara Stallworth, James Wheeler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Tennessee has one of the highest rates of opioid prescribing in the United States; therefore, the objectives of this study were to examine availability, pricing, and pharmacist-initiated recommendations of naloxone in retail community pharmacies in Eastern and Western Tennessee; to identify the most common barriers to naloxone dispensing and strategies to improve access; and to determine regional differences in access to naloxone.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey conducted via telephone. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All retail community pharmacies located in the most populous counties in the eastern and western regions of Tennessee were eligible for inclusion, as were all retail community pharmacies in the 5 counties in each region that had the highest rates of opioid prescriptions (316 pharmacies identified in 12 counties). OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included availability, price, and pharmacist-initiated recommendations of naloxone products, barriers to dispensing, and suggestions to improve naloxone access. Survey responses were summarized as descriptive statistics. Chi-square, independent samples t test, and inductive content analysis were conducted.
RESULTS: Response rate was 56.3%. Most participants (92.7%) reported that naloxone (Narcan) was available from their pharmacies at a mean cash price of $132.49, with no statistically significant differences between regions. The most commonly reported barrier was cost (70.2%). When queried about recommendations to various groups at a high risk of overdose, as advised by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 42.1% to 69.1% of pharmacies reported recommending naloxone to at least 50% of high-risk patients. Suggestions to increase naloxone access included lowering the cost and improving naloxone-related education for patients, pharmacists, and other providers.
CONCLUSION: Although Narcan was widely available, cost was a frequently cited barrier to dispensing. Pharmacist-initiated recommendations for coprescribing and dispensing naloxone to patients at a high risk of overdose were limited. Addressing cost issues in addition to increasing patient and pharmacist education concerning the use and benefit of naloxone were suggested to improve naloxone access.
Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146134     DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacists' experiences with a statewide naloxone standing order program in Massachusetts: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Susannah Slocum; Jenny Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Ziming Xuan; Traci C Green; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-08-23

2.  Limited access to pharmacy-based naloxone in West Virginia: Results from a statewide purchase trial.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Jenny E Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Ziming Xuan; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Pharmacy naloxone codispensing: A mixed methods study of practices and perspectives under a statewide standing order program.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Susannah Slocum; Jenny E Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Ziming Xuan; Traci C Green; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2022-03-19

4.  Naloxone dispensing among the commercially insured population in the United States from 2015 to 2018.

Authors:  Christopher Dunphy; Kun Zhang; Gery P Guy; Christopher M Jones
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.637

5.  Protocol for the Optimizing Naloxone Dispensing in Pharmacies (ONDP) Online Continuing Education Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ashley Cid; Alec Patten; Michael Beazely; Kelly Grindrod; Jennifer Yessis; Feng Chang
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  If we build it, will they come? Perspectives on pharmacy-based naloxone among family and friends of people who use opioids: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Susannah Slocum; Jenny E Ozga; Rebecca Joyce; Alexander Y Walley; Robin A Pollini
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Considering the Potential Benefits of Over-the-Counter Naloxone.

Authors:  Kirk E Evoy; Lucas G Hill; Corey S Davis
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2021-02-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.