Literature DB >> 32146111

Do Patient Point of Entry and Medicaid Status Affect Quality Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

James E Feng1, Mackenzie A Roof2, Mohamed Adnan2, Afshin A Anoushiravani3, Scott Friedlander2, Claudette M Lajam2, Jonathan Vigdorchik4, James D Slover2, Ran Schwarzkopf2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of surgeon practice and patient care setting have not been studied in the Medicaid population undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to evaluate whether point of entry and Medicaid status affect outcomes following TKA.
METHODS: The electronic medical record at our urban, academic, tertiary care hospital system was retrospectively reviewed for all primary, unilateral TKA during January 2016 and January 2018. Outpatient visits within the 6-month preoperative period categorized TKA recipients as either Hospital Ambulatory Clinic Centers patients with Medicaid insurance or private office patients with non-Medicaid insurers.
RESULTS: There were 174 Medicaid patients and 317 non-Medicaid patients for 491 total patients. Medicaid patients were significantly younger (62.6 ± 1.6 vs 65.4 ± 1.1 years, P < .01), of "other' ethnicity (43.1% vs 25.6%, P < .01), and to be a current smoker (9.3% vs 6.6%, P = .02). There was no difference in gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. After controlling for patient factors, the Medicaid effect was insignificant for surgical time (exponentiated β 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.01, P = .076) and facility discharge (odds ratio 1.58, 95% CI 0.71-3.51, P = .262). Medicaid status had a significant effect on length of stay (LOS) (rate ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43, P = .026).
CONCLUSION: Multivariable analysis controlling for patient factors demonstrated that Medicaid coverage had minimal effect on surgical time and facility discharge. Medicaid patients had significantly longer LOS by one-half day. These results indicate that comparable outcomes can be achieved for Medicaid patients following TKA provided that the surgeon and care setting are similar. However, increased care coordination and preoperative education may be necessary to normalize disparities in hospital LOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational analysis.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; insurance type; outcomes; primary payer; total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 32146111     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

Review 1.  Racial Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle S Chun; Annemarie K Leonard; Zenaida Enchill; Linda I Suleiman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-10-09

2.  Patients With Medicaid Insurance Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction have Lower Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee Scores and are Less Likely to Return to Sport Than Privately Insured Patients.

Authors:  Neha S Chava; Luc M Fortier; Neil Verma; Zeeshan Khan; Benjamin Kerzner; Suhas P Dasari; Asheesh Bedi; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 3.  Socioeconomic factors affecting outcomes in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review on healthcare disparities.

Authors:  Paul M Alvarez; John F McKeon; Andrew I Spitzer; Chad A Krueger; Matthew Pigott; Mengnai Li; Sravya P Vajapey
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-10-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.