Marcel Alex Soares Dos Santos1, José Luis Braga de Aquino2, Elisangela Pegas3, Elaine Cristina Faria Abrahao Machado4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: marceldossantos@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Head, Neck and Chest Surgery, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 3. Leprosy, Bullous and Phototherapy Clinic, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 4. Dermatology Clinic, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Dear Editor,Leprosy is a contagious, chronic, granulomatous disease caused by the gram-positive bacillus Mycobacterium leprae.It mainly affects the skin and the peripheral nerves, but it can also compromise other organs. May have neurological and motor sequelae and have high disabling power if not treated early.It is still a serious public health problem and is culturally and socially linked to a stigmatizing condition. It is the main infectious cause of disability in man. In 2017, 210,671 new cases were detected in the world, Brazil being the 2nd country in the world with the highest prevalence of the disease. In 2017, the country recorded 26,875 new cases of leprosy, representing 12.7% of the global total of new occurrences.2, 3Knowing the context of leprosypatients in a university hospital, with reference service in the treatment of the disease, contributes to the formulation of strategies in public health aimed at their control and gives subsidy to actions to face this local grievance.This is an epidemiological, descriptive, retrospective study whose objective is to analyze the relationship of the clinical variables of leprosy in the patients reported in an outpatient dermatology clinic reference in leprosy in the city of Campinas in the period of 2010–2017, by analyzing the information contained in the medical records of these patients (n = 111).The relationship between the variables was assessed using the Chi-Square test, Student's t-test or ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. The significance level considered was 5%.In table 1 it is possible to see the relation of the operational classification with the other variables. Significant association of the presence of neural symptoms with operational classification (p < 0.0001) was observed. There are more patients in the multibacillary classification with neural symptoms (p < 0.0001), as well as physical incapacity (p = 0.0124).
Table 1
Comparison between operational classifications groups (Chi-square test).
Variable
Category
Operational classification
Total
p-Value
MB
PB
n
%
n
%
n
%
Gender
Female
37
43.5
10
38.5
47
42.3
0.6472
Male
48
56.5
16
61.5
64
57.7
Clinical form
Boderline
35
41.2
0
0.0
35
31.5
<0.0001
Indeterminate
4
4.7
9
34.6
13
11.7
Pure neural
3
3.5
1
3.8
4
3.6
Tuberculoid
3
3.5
16
61.5
19
17.1
Lepromatous
40
47.1
0
0.0
40
36.0
Neural symptoms
No
7
8.8
12
46.2
19
17.9
<0.0001
Yes
73
91.3
14
53.8
87
82.1
Physical disability
No
20
37.0
11
73.3
31
44.9
0.0124
Yes
34
63.0
4
26.7
38
55.1
Comparison between operational classifications groups (Chi-square test).In the analysis of the clinical form with the other variables, it was observed an association of the clinical form with presence of neural symptoms (p = 0.0002), patients with the virchowian form and dimorphic have more neural symptoms.Table 2 shows the comparison of the age of diagnosis and the other variables studied. There was a significant difference in the age of diagnosis in relation to the operational classification (p = 0.0001), patients with paucibacillary classification had a lower age of diagnosis. Patients with clinical virchowian form (p = 0.0112), those with neural symptoms (p = 0.0278) and with physical disability (p = 0.0102) present a higher age of diagnosis.
Table 2
Comparison of the age of diagnosis among the variables.
Variable
Category
n
Average
SD
Minimum
Median
Maximum
p-Value
Operational classification
Multibacillary
85
50.3
16.4
15.0
51.0
87.0
0.0001
Paucibacillary
26
35.7
16.1
8.0
29.5
74.0
Clinical form
Boderline
35
50.5
14.7
21.0
49.0
81.0
0.0112
Indeterminate
13
33.5
15.3
10.0
27.0
61.0
Pure neural
4
41.5
34.9
8.0
41.5
75.0
Tuberculoid
19
42.7
14.3
25.0
42.0
74.0
Lepromatous
40
50.6
17.5
15.0
51.5
87.0
Neural symptoms
No
19
38.3
13.6
10.0
42.0
61.0
0.0278
Yes
87
47.7
17.2
8.0
48.0
81.0
Physical disability
No
31
40.3
16.5
8.0
40.0
70.0
0.0102
Yes
38
50.4
15.2
18.0
51.0
79.0
Baciloscopy pre treatment
Negative
72
46.7
17.6
8.0
45.5
81.0
0.8392
Positive
39
47.4
17.1
15.0
48.0
87.0
Baciloscopy after treatment
Negative
83
46.8
16.5
8.0
48.0
78.0
0.4167
Positive
9
42.1
16.4
27.0
38.0
79.0
Comparison of the age of diagnosis among the variables.Table 3 shows the associations of neural symptoms with the other variables. Patients with neural symptoms have more physical disability (p = 0.0159), have more positive bacilloscopy before treatment (p = 0.0139), use more frequent PQT-MB therapeutic scheme (p < 0.0001) and extend the treatment more than the predetermined time (p = 0.0172).
Table 3
Comparison between groups of neural symptoms (Chi-square test).
Variable
Category
Neural symptoms
Total
p-Value
No
n
%
n
%
n
%
Gender
Female
10
52.6
34
39.1
44
41.5
0.2775
Male
9
47.4
53
60.9
62
58.5
Physical disability
No
8
80.0
23
39.0
31
44.9
0.0159
Yes
2
20.0
36
61.0
38
55.1
Baciloscopy pretreatment
Negative
17
89.5
52
59.8
69
65.1
0.0139
Positive
2
10.5
35
40.2
37
34.9
Baciloscopy after treatment
Negative
17
100.0
64
87.7
81
90.0
0.1270
Positive
0
0.0
9
12.3
9
10.0
Treatment
PQT-MB
7
36.8
74
85.1
81
76.4
<0.0001
PQT-PB
12
63.2
13
14.9
25
23.6
Extended treatment
No
16
94.1
54
65.1
70
70.0
0.0172
Yes
1
5.9
29
34.9
30
30.0
Comparison between groups of neural symptoms (Chi-square test).In relation to the presence of physical disability, it was observed that male patients have more physical disability (p-value = 0.0273), as well as patients with multibacillary treatment regimen (p-value = 0.0046).Multibacillary patients are twice as likely to have physical disabilities as paucibacillary patients because multibacillary patients have a high bacillary load in the body and because they have a generally more clinical picture, the bacilli act longer on the nerves, causing neural symptoms and leading to the disabilities.The virchowian clinical form has the greatest impact on the development of physical disabilities and deformities, increasing the chance of developing Grade II disability in 16.5 times.Patients older than 60 years are twice as likely to be multibacillary as young people are less exposed to Mycobacterium leprae and the development of the multibacillary form requires a long incubation period of the bacillus. Elderly patients present age-related immunological changes and increased susceptibility to infections with monocytes and neutrophils with impairment of functions, reduction of phagocytic capacity, decreased antigen presentation and change in the cytokine profile of Th1 to Th2.Men are 1.4 times more likely to develop physical disabilities than women because they take less health care, delaying the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. With more time of the bacillus acting actively in the organism, the greater the neural damage.2, 5The study presented some limitations. Although the dermatology outpatient clinic of the study met a wide demand in the city of Campinas-SP, only the patients notified at the site were included in the study. A large percentage of patients were not evaluated for the presence of physical disabilities (37.8%). The study was based on the classification of Madrid and the operational one presented by the WHO. It is worth noting that, unlike Ridley and Jopling's classification, the classifications used do not separate the dimorphic patients into DT, DD and DV, which present clinical, bacteriological and immunological differences.
Financial support
None declared.
Authors’ contributions
Marcel Alex Soares dos Santos: Statistic analysis; approval of the final version of the manuscript; conception and planning of the study; elaboration and writing of the manuscript; obtaining, analysis, and interpretation of the data; critical review of the literature; critical review of the manuscript.José Luis Braga de Aquino: Approval of the final version of the manuscript; conception and planning of the study; effective participation in research orientation.Elisangela Pegas: Conception and planning of the study; intellectual participation in the propaedeutic and/or therapeutic conduct of the studied cases.Elaine Cristina Faria Abrahao Machado: Conception and planning of the study; elaboration and writing of the manuscript.
Authors: Cristiane Moschioni; Carlos Maurício de Figueiredo Antunes; Maria Aparecida Faria Grossi; José Roberto Lambertucci Journal: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.581
Authors: Mauricio Lisboa Nobre; Ximena Illarramendi; Kathryn Margaret Dupnik; Mariana de Andrea Hacker; José Augusto da Costa Nery; Selma Maria Bezerra Jerônimo; Euzenir Nunes Sarno Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2017-02-13
Authors: Maria Eduarda Gomes da Cruz Silva; Carlos Dornels Freire de Souza; Susanne Pinheiro Costa e Silva; Flávia Monteiro da Costa; Rodrigo Feliciano do Carmo Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.896