Literature DB >> 32145369

Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods.

Perrine Créquit1, Isabelle Boutron2, Joerg Meerpohl3, Hywel C Williams4, Jonathan Craig5, Philippe Ravaud6.   

Abstract

To become user driven and more useful for decision-making, the current evidence synthesis ecosystem requires significant changes (Paper 1. Future of evidence ecosystem series). Reviewers have access to new sources of data (clinical trial registries, protocols, and clinical study reports from regulatory agencies or pharmaceutical companies) for more information on randomized control trials. With all these newly available data, the management of multiple and scattered trial reports is even more challenging. New types of data are also becoming available: individual patient data and routinely collected data. With the increasing number of diverse sources to be searched and the amount of data to be extracted, the process needs to be rethought. New approaches and tools, such as automation technologies and crowdsourcing, should help accelerate the process. The implementation of these new approaches and methods requires a substantial rethinking and redesign of the current evidence synthesis ecosystem. The concept of a "living" evidence synthesis enterprise, with living systematic review and living network meta-analysis, has recently emerged. Such an evidence synthesis ecosystem implies conceptualizing evidence synthesis as a continuous process built around a clinical question of interest and no longer as a small team independently answering a specific clinical question at a single point in time.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automation; Clinical study report; Crowdsourcing; Evidence synthesis; Living network meta-analysis; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32145369     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  4 in total

1.  Living systematic reviews in rehabilitation science can improve evidence-based healthcare.

Authors:  S Elbers; H Wittink; U Kaiser; J Kleijnen; J Pool; A Köke; R Smeets
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-07

2.  A Protocol of a Guideline to Establish the Evidence Ecosystem of Acupuncture.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Nian Li; Juan Li; Ying He; Yuxi Li; Dongling Zhong; Xiaobo Liu; Jin Fan; Rongjiang Jin; Deying Kang; Yonggang Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  Levels of Evidence Supporting United States Guidelines in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treatment.

Authors:  Anna Pellat; Isabelle Boutron; Romain Coriat; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  The COVID-NMA Project: Building an Evidence Ecosystem for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Anna Chaimani; Joerg J Meerpohl; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Declan Devane; Gabriel Rada; David Tovey; Giacomo Grasselli; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.