Literature DB >> 32145083

The effect of transcrestal sinus-floor elevation without graft on the long-term prognosis of maxillary implants.

Peter Rammelsberg1, Samuel Kilian2, Christopher Büsch2, Stefanie Kappel1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effects of (a) transcrestal sinus-floor elevation (TSFE) and (b) residual bone height on long-term implant survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chi-squared and t tests were used for descriptive comparison of the groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and corresponding log-rank tests were used to investigate implant survival over time. Multivariable Cox regressions were performed for the total population and experimental group.
RESULTS: A total of 634 patients received 648 implants with TSFE, while 674 implants without TSFE served as controls. Thirty implant failures occurred in the experimental group and 28 in the control group. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the 157 implants (24.3%) still under observation showed a probability of survival of 93.7% for the implants with TSFE and 92.9% for the 72 implants without TSFE (p = .678). The probability of 10-year survival of all implants in the experimental group decreased to 77.4% for implants placed in residual bone heights of 1-3 mm, compared with 95.7% for implant sites with bone heights of 4-6 mm and 97.6% for bone heights of >6 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcrestal sinus-floor elevation has no negative effect on the long-term implant survival. Membrane perforation or negligible bone height, however, reduces the probability of 10-year survival.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant survival; maxillary augmentation; reduced bone height; transcrestal sinus-floor elevation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32145083     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  6 in total

1.  Sinus mucosa thinning and perforation after sinus augmentation. A histological study in rabbits.

Authors:  Shingo Kato; Daniele Botticelli; Enzo De Santis; Masatsugu Kanayama; Sabrina Ferreira; Idelmo Rangel-Garcia
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-02-04

2.  Influence of implant protrusion length on non-grafting osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant: a 3- to 9-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Yi Yu; Qiming Jiang; Xiaolin Yu; Feilong Deng; Zhengchuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 3.  Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: a systematic review of clinical data.

Authors:  Mehdi Ekhlasmandkermani; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Farhad Hajizadeh; Pooria Fallah Abed; Lida Kheiri; Aida Kheiri
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Factors impacting new bone formation in transcrestal sinus floor elevation followed by implant placement: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zhe-Zhen Lin; Dong-Qian Xu; Yong Wang; Xue Gao; Qi Cai; Xi Ding
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Digital Workflow for the Design, Manufacture, and Application of Custom-Made Short Implants With Wing Retention Device.

Authors:  Zexian Xu; Zhen Yang; Jianjun Yang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  Intraoperative complications and early implant failure after transcrestal sinus floor elevation with residual bone height ≤5 mm: A retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Fabio Bernardello; Sergio Spinato; Rossano Mura; Michele Perelli; Teresa Lombardi; Giuseppe Troiano; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 5.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.