Literature DB >> 32144499

Predicting Unnecessary Nodule Biopsies from a Small, Unbalanced, and Pathologically Proven Dataset by Transfer Learning.

Fangfang Han1,2, Linkai Yan2, Junxin Chen2, Yueyang Teng2, Shuo Chen2, Shouliang Qi2, Wei Qian3, Jie Yang4, William Moore5, Shu Zhang5, Zhengrong Liang6.   

Abstract

This study explores an automatic diagnosis method to predict unnecessary nodule biopsy from a small, unbalanced, and pathologically proven database. The automatic diagnosis method is based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. Because of the small and unbalanced samples, the presented method aims to improve the transfer learning capability via the VGG16 architecture and optimize the related transfer learning parameters. For comparison purpose, a traditional machine learning method is implemented, which extracts the texture features and classifies the features by support vector machine (SVM). The database includes 68 biopsied nodules, 16 are pathologically proven benign and the remaining 52 are malignant. To consider the volumetric data by the CNN model, each image slice from each nodule volume is selected randomly until all image slices of each nodule are utilized. The leave-one-out and 10-folder cross validations are applied to train and test the randomly selected 68 image slices (one image slice from one nodule) in each experiment, respectively. The averages over all the experimental outcomes are the final results. The experiments revealed that the features from both the medical and the natural images share the similarity of focusing on simpler and less-abstract objects, leading to the conclusion that not the more the transfer convolutional layers, the better the classification results. Transfer learning from other larger datasets can supply additional information to small and unbalanced datasets to improve the classification performance. The presented method has shown the potential to adapt CNN architecture to improve the prediction of unnecessary nodule biopsy from small, unbalanced, and pathologically proven volumetric dataset.

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; Decrease unnecessary biopsy; Lung cancer screening; Small and unbalanced dataset; Transfer learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32144499      PMCID: PMC7256141          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00306-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  21 in total

1.  Three-dimensional segmentation and growth-rate estimation of small pulmonary nodules in helical CT images.

Authors:  William J Kostis; Anthony P Reeves; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Random forest based lung nodule classification aided by clustering.

Authors:  S L A Lee; A Z Kouzani; E J Hu
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Usefulness of circumference difference for estimating the likelihood of malignancy in small solitary pulmonary nodules on CT.

Authors:  Hajime Saito; Yoshihiro Minamiya; Hideki Kawai; Taku Nakagawa; Manabu Ito; Yukiko Hosono; Satoru Motoyama; Manabu Hashimoto; Koichi Ishiyama; Jun-Ichi Ogawa
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Computer-aided differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules imaged by high-resolution CT.

Authors:  Shingo Iwano; Tatsuya Nakamura; Yuko Kamioka; Mitsuru Ikeda; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  3D shape analysis for early diagnosis of malignant lung nodules.

Authors:  Ayman El-Bazl; Matthew Nitzken; Fahmi Khalifa; Ahmed Elnakib; Georgy Gimel'farb; Robert Falk; Mohammed Abo El-Ghar
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2011

7.  A hybrid CNN feature model for pulmonary nodule malignancy risk differentiation.

Authors:  Huafeng Wang; Tingting Zhao; Lihong Connie Li; Haixia Pan; Wanquan Liu; Haoqi Gao; Fangfang Han; Yuehai Wang; Yifan Qi; Zhengrong Liang
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.535

8.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc Bidaut; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Charles R Meyer; Anthony P Reeves; Binsheng Zhao; Denise R Aberle; Claudia I Henschke; Eric A Hoffman; Ella A Kazerooni; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R Van Beeke; David Yankelevitz; Alberto M Biancardi; Peyton H Bland; Matthew S Brown; Roger M Engelmann; Gary E Laderach; Daniel Max; Richard C Pais; David P Y Qing; Rachael Y Roberts; Amanda R Smith; Adam Starkey; Poonam Batrah; Philip Caligiuri; Ali Farooqi; Gregory W Gladish; C Matilda Jude; Reginald F Munden; Iva Petkovska; Leslie E Quint; Lawrence H Schwartz; Baskaran Sundaram; Lori E Dodd; Charles Fenimore; David Gur; Nicholas Petrick; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Brian Hughes; Alessi Vande Casteele; Sangeeta Gupte; Maha Sallamm; Michael D Heath; Michael H Kuhn; Ekta Dharaiya; Richard Burns; David S Fryd; Marcos Salganicoff; Vikram Anand; Uri Shreter; Stephen Vastagh; Barbara Y Croft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.

Authors:  Claudia Allemani; Tomohiro Matsuda; Veronica Di Carlo; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Maja Nikšić; Audrey Bonaventure; Mikhail Valkov; Christopher J Johnson; Jacques Estève; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Sultan Eser; Gerda Engholm; Charles A Stiller; Alain Monnereau; Ryan R Woods; Otto Visser; Gek Hsiang Lim; Joanne Aitken; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Co-occurrence of Local Anisotropic Gradient Orientations (CoLlAGe): A new radiomics descriptor.

Authors:  Prateek Prasanna; Pallavi Tiwari; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated prediction of early spontaneous miscarriage based on the analyzing ultrasonographic gestational sac imaging by the convolutional neural network: a case-control and cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qixin Zhang; Chenghuan Yin; Lizhu Chen; Zeyu Yang; Shanshan Jia; Xue Sun; Yuzuo Bai; Fangfang Han; Zhengwei Yuan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.105

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.