Andreas Varkaris1, Wenxin Xu1, Roger B Davis2, Brian Healy3, David F McDermott4. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 4. Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: dmcdermo@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the most commonly used medications in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recently, large clinical trials have shown favorable outcomes in patients treated with combined immune checkpoint plus VEGFR inhibition compared with VEGFR inhibition alone. However, the benefit among favorable risk (based on International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium score) and elderly (age > 65 years) patients was not clear, leading to a discrepancy between United States Food and Drug Administration and European Association of Urology recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched available literature for phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of combining immunotherapy plus VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors versus standard of care in patients with previously untreated mRCC. Combinations that were included in United States Food and Drug Administration recommendations or European Association of Urology guidelines were used for analysis. We performed a meta-analysis with a random effects model to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy-VEGFR inhibitor combinations compared with sunitinib in favorable risk and elderly patients. RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with combination therapy compared with sunitinib in patients with age > 65 years (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.84; P = .001). The PFS in favorable risk disease was improved with combination therapy compared with sunitinib, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.01; P = .055). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis strengthens the trend of beneficial effect in prolonging PFS in both subgroups compared with each trial alone, indicating that favorable risk and elderly patients with mRCC likely benefit from combining programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death-ligand 1 and VEGFR inhibition.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the most commonly used medications in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recently, large clinical trials have shown favorable outcomes in patients treated with combined immune checkpoint plus VEGFR inhibition compared with VEGFR inhibition alone. However, the benefit among favorable risk (based on International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium score) and elderly (age > 65 years) patients was not clear, leading to a discrepancy between United States Food and Drug Administration and European Association of Urology recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched available literature for phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of combining immunotherapy plus VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors versus standard of care in patients with previously untreated mRCC. Combinations that were included in United States Food and Drug Administration recommendations or European Association of Urology guidelines were used for analysis. We performed a meta-analysis with a random effects model to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy-VEGFR inhibitor combinations compared with sunitinib in favorable risk and elderly patients. RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged with combination therapy compared with sunitinib in patients with age > 65 years (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.84; P = .001). The PFS in favorable risk disease was improved with combination therapy compared with sunitinib, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.01; P = .055). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis strengthens the trend of beneficial effect in prolonging PFS in both subgroups compared with each trial alone, indicating that favorable risk and elderly patients with mRCC likely benefit from combining programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death-ligand 1 and VEGFR inhibition.
Authors: Börje Ljungberg; Laurance Albiges; Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Karim Bensalah; Saeed Dabestani; Sergio Fernández-Pello; Rachel H Giles; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Teele Kuusk; Thomas B Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Rana Tahbaz; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-02-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Shaan Dudani; Jeffrey Graham; J Connor Wells; Ziad Bakouny; Sumanta K Pal; Nazli Dizman; Frede Donskov; Camillo Porta; Guillermo de Velasco; Aaron Hansen; Marco Iafolla; Benoit Beuselinck; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Lori A Wood; Elizabeth Liow; Flora Yan; Takeshi Yuasa; Georg A Bjarnason; Toni K Choueiri; Daniel Y C Heng Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Brian I Rini; Elizabeth R Plimack; Viktor Stus; Rustem Gafanov; Robert Hawkins; Dmitry Nosov; Frédéric Pouliot; Boris Alekseev; Denis Soulières; Bohuslav Melichar; Ihor Vynnychenko; Anna Kryzhanivska; Igor Bondarenko; Sergio J Azevedo; Delphine Borchiellini; Cezary Szczylik; Maurice Markus; Raymond S McDermott; Jens Bedke; Sophie Tartas; Yen-Hwa Chang; Satoshi Tamada; Qiong Shou; Rodolfo F Perini; Mei Chen; Michael B Atkins; Thomas Powles Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-02-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Gary Hudes; George Wilding; Lawrence H Schwartz; Subramanian Hariharan; Susan Kempin; Rana Fayyad; Robert A Figlin Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Axel Bex; Laurence Albiges; Michael Staehler; Karim Bensalah; Rachel H Giles; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas B Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Sergio Fernández-Pello; Rana Tahbaz; Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Alessandro Volpe; Börje Ljungberg; Bernard Escudier; Thomas Powles Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Konstantin Penkov; John Haanen; Brian Rini; Laurence Albiges; Matthew T Campbell; Balaji Venugopal; Christian Kollmannsberger; Sylvie Negrier; Motohide Uemura; Jae L Lee; Aleksandr Vasiliev; Wilson H Miller; Howard Gurney; Manuela Schmidinger; James Larkin; Michael B Atkins; Jens Bedke; Boris Alekseev; Jing Wang; Mariangela Mariani; Paul B Robbins; Aleksander Chudnovsky; Camilla Fowst; Subramanian Hariharan; Bo Huang; Alessandra di Pietro; Toni K Choueiri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-02-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Viktor Grünwald; Thomas Powles; Toni K Choueiri; Thomas E Hutson; Camillo Porta; Masatoshi Eto; Cora N Sternberg; Sun Young Rha; Cixin S He; Corina E Dutcus; Alan Smith; Lea Dutta; Kalgi Mody; Robert J Motzer Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Melissa García-Caballero; José Antonio Torres-Vargas; Ana Dácil Marrero; Beatriz Martínez-Poveda; Miguel Ángel Medina; Ana R Quesada Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Y Tomita; R J Motzer; T K Choueiri; B I Rini; H Miyake; H Uemura; L Albiges; Y Fujii; Y Umeyama; J Wang; M Mariani; M Schmidinger Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2022-04-06