Enrico Ruggeri1, Marilena Giannantonio2, Federica Agostini2, Rita Ostan2, Loris Pironi3, Raffaella Pannuti2. 1. National Tumor Assistance (ANT) Foundation, Via Jacopo di Paolo, 36 - 40128 Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: enrico.ruggeri@ant.it. 2. National Tumor Assistance (ANT) Foundation, Via Jacopo di Paolo, 36 - 40128 Bologna, Italy. 3. Center for Chronic Intestinal Failure, St Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9 - 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of malnutrition is over 70% in advanced cancer patients and impacts negatively on survival and quality of life. Artificial nutrition can be integrated into a home palliative care program. This observational study aims to describe the criteria for identifying the cancer patients that could benefit from home artificial nutrition (HAN) and to evaluate its impact on survival and performance status. METHODS: The selection criteria for patient's eligibility to HAN were: Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥40, life expectancy ≥6 weeks, inadequate caloric intake ± malnutrition, suitable psycho-physical conditions and informed consent. The access route for nutritional therapy (home parenteral nutrition, HPN; home enteral nutrition, HEN) was chosen according to the ESPEN Guidelines. The parameters considered were: primary site of the tumor; oral food intake; nutritional status; stage of cachexia; fluid, energy and protein supplied by HAN; survival. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, 43,474 cancer patients were assisted at home in Bologna (Italy). HAN started in 969 patients (2.2% of total patients, 571 men and 398 women, mean age 65.7 ± 12.7 years): HPN in 629 patients (64.9%), with gastrointestinal obstruction as the main indication; HEN in 340 patients (35.1%), with dysphagia as the main indication. Considering the 890 deceased patients, the mean survival after the start of HAN was 18.3 weeks and 649 patients (72.9%) survived more than 6 weeks. The mean survival was higher in HEN (22.1 weeks) compared to HPN patients (16.1 weeks) (p < .001). After one month, KPS was unchanged in 649 (67.0%), increased in 232 (23.9%) and decreased in 88 patients (9.1%). The mean KPS increased in patients starting HAN in pre-cachexia and cachexia (p < .001). Cachexia and refractory cachexia at the entry were associated with a reduced survival [odds ratio: 1.5 and 2.3 respectively, p < .001 for both condition] respect to pre-cachexia. CONCLUSIONS: The selection criteria allow the identification of the patient who can take advantage of HAN. HAN can be effective in avoiding death from malnutrition in 73% of patients, and in maintaining or improving the KPS at one month in 90% of cases. The benefits provided by HAN on survival and performance status depend on the cachexia degree at the entry.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of malnutrition is over 70% in advanced cancerpatients and impacts negatively on survival and quality of life. Artificial nutrition can be integrated into a home palliative care program. This observational study aims to describe the criteria for identifying the cancerpatients that could benefit from home artificial nutrition (HAN) and to evaluate its impact on survival and performance status. METHODS: The selection criteria for patient's eligibility to HAN were: Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥40, life expectancy ≥6 weeks, inadequate caloric intake ± malnutrition, suitable psycho-physical conditions and informed consent. The access route for nutritional therapy (home parenteral nutrition, HPN; home enteral nutrition, HEN) was chosen according to the ESPEN Guidelines. The parameters considered were: primary site of the tumor; oral food intake; nutritional status; stage of cachexia; fluid, energy and protein supplied by HAN; survival. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, 43,474 cancerpatients were assisted at home in Bologna (Italy). HAN started in 969 patients (2.2% of total patients, 571 men and 398 women, mean age 65.7 ± 12.7 years): HPN in 629 patients (64.9%), with gastrointestinal obstruction as the main indication; HEN in 340 patients (35.1%), with dysphagia as the main indication. Considering the 890 deceased patients, the mean survival after the start of HAN was 18.3 weeks and 649 patients (72.9%) survived more than 6 weeks. The mean survival was higher in HEN (22.1 weeks) compared to HPN patients (16.1 weeks) (p < .001). After one month, KPS was unchanged in 649 (67.0%), increased in 232 (23.9%) and decreased in 88 patients (9.1%). The mean KPS increased in patients starting HAN in pre-cachexia and cachexia (p < .001). Cachexia and refractory cachexia at the entry were associated with a reduced survival [odds ratio: 1.5 and 2.3 respectively, p < .001 for both condition] respect to pre-cachexia. CONCLUSIONS: The selection criteria allow the identification of the patient who can take advantage of HAN. HAN can be effective in avoiding death from malnutrition in 73% of patients, and in maintaining or improving the KPS at one month in 90% of cases. The benefits provided by HAN on survival and performance status depend on the cachexia degree at the entry.
Authors: Ainhoa Madariaga; Jenny Lau; Arunangshu Ghoshal; Tomasz Dzierżanowski; Philip Larkin; Jacek Sobocki; Andrew Dickman; Kate Furness; Rouhi Fazelzad; Gregory B Crawford; Stephanie Lheureux Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 3.359