| Literature DB >> 32143283 |
Yayuan Yang1, Ling Han1, Qunli Yu1, Yongfang Gao1, Rende Song2.
Abstract
To explore the postmortem physiological mechanism of muscle, activity of adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) as well as its role in energy metabolism of postmortem yaks were studied. In this experiment, we injected 5-amino-1-beta-d-furanonyl imidazole-4-formamide (AICAR), a specific activator of AMPK, and STO-609 to observe the changes in glycolysis, energy metabolism, AMPK activity, and AMPK gene expression (PRKA1 and PRKA2) in postmortem yaks during maturation. The results showed that AICAR could increase the expression of the PRKKA1 and PRKAA2 genes, activate AMPK and increase its activity. The effects of AICAR include a lower concentration of ATP, an increase in AMP production, an acceleration of glycolysis, an increase in the lactic acid concentration, and a decrease in the pH value. In contrast, STO-609 had the opposite effect. Under hypoxic adaptation, the activity of the meat AMPK increased, which accelerated glycolysis and metabolism and more effectively regulated energy metabolism. Therefore, this study lays the foundation for establishing a theoretical system of energy metabolism in postmortem yak meat.Entities:
Keywords: AICAR; AMP-activated protein kinase; STO-609; energy metabolism; skeletal muscle
Year: 2020 PMID: 32143283 PMCID: PMC7143603 DOI: 10.3390/ani10030427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Primer sequences and parameter used for real-time quantitative PCR [29].
| Gene Symbol | No. | Gene Bank | Primers 5′-3′ | GC% | Tm | Amplification Length/bp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRKAA1 | BA040395 | NM0011098022 | F-CACACATGAATGCAAAGATAGCTGA | 40.0 | 63.5 | 109 |
| R-ATTACTTCTGGTGCAGCATAGTTGG | 44.0 | 62.8 | ||||
| PRKAA2 | BA073991 | NM0012056051 | F-GAAGATCGGCCACTACGTGCT | 57.1 | 63.8 | 93 |
| R-ACTTTATGGCCTGTCAATTGATGCT | 40.0 | 64.1 |
(Graphpad Prism; La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Figure 1pH values of postmortem yak longissimus dorsal muscle. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analyses between the control group and two treatment groups at 0 h to 168 h (three repetitions for each yak and 10 yaks from each group) (x, y, z p < 0.05). Duncan’s New Multiple-range test was used for the differences between the control group and two treatment groups at 0 h to 168 h. At 0 h, the lowercase letters represent the difference of the treatment group, and the capital letters represent stands the difference of the control group over time (p < 0.05). Error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean.
Figure 2Lactic acid in postmortem yak longissimus dorsal muscle.
Nucleotide concentrations in postmortem yak longissimus dorsal muscle.
| Time | 0 h | 12 h | 24 h | 72 h | 120 h | 168 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP contents (lmol/g muscle) | ||||||
| STO-609 | 3.00 ± 0.083 ax | 1.69 ± 0.032 bx | 1.58 ± 0.032 cx | 0.11 ± 0.033 ex | 0.32 ± 0.087 dx | 0.45 ± 0.034 dx |
| Control | 3.01 ± 0.093 Ax | 1.95 ± 0.062 By | 1.84 ± 0.053 Cy | 0.22 ± 0.056 Ey | 0.51 ± 0.067 Dy | 0.61 ± 0.055 dy |
| AICAR | 3.01 ± 0.041 ax | 2.26 ± 0.055 bz | 2.18 ± 0.051 cz | 0.57 ± 0.036 ez | 0.73 ± 0.025 dz | 0.81 ± 0.020 dz |
| ADP contents (lmol/g muscle) | ||||||
| STO-609 | 3.91 ± 0.031 ax | 1.72 ± 0.046 bx | 0.035 ± 0.043 ex | 0.041 ± 0.072 dx | 0.57 ± 0.042 cx | 0.58 ± 0.021 cx |
| Control | 3.99 ± 0.026 Ax | 1.91 ± 0.073 By | 0.54 ± 0.070 Dy | 0.77 ± 0.112 Cy | 0.72 ± 0.087 Cy | 0.80 ± 0.025 Cy |
| AICAR | 4.03 ± 0.042 az | 2.11 ± 0.045 bz | 0.89 ± 0.036 dz | 1.02 ± 0.078 cz | 1.05 ± 0.031 cz | 1.06 ± 0.055 cz |
| AMP contents (lmol/g muscle) | ||||||
| STO-609 | 0.24 ± 0.011 ax | 0.09 ± 0.032 cx | 0.12 ± 0.028 bx | 0.065 ± 0.002 dx | 0.058 ± 0.005 ex | 0.031 ± 0.015 fx |
| Control | 0.25 ± 0.015 Ax | 0.14 ± 0.011 Cy | 0.18 ± 0.009 By | 0.11 ± 0.006 Dy | 0.087 ± 0.005 Ey | 0.077 ± 0.007 Fy |
| AICAR | 0.25 ± 0.004 ax | 0.20 ± 0.010 cz | 0.25 ± 0.008 bz | 0.17 ± 0.003 dz | 0.104 ± 0.007 ez | 0.100 ± 0.003 fz |
| IMP contents (lmol/g muscle) | ||||||
| STO-609 | 1.32 ± 0.021 fx | 1.96 ± 0.098 ex | 2.43 ± 0.121 dx | 5.42 ± 0.024 ax | 3.72 ± 0.021 cx | 4.15 ± 0.045 bx |
| Control | 1.34 ± 0.018 Fy | 2.28 ± 0.110 Ey | 2.67 ± 0.180 Dy | 5.74 ± 0.010 Ay | 4.05 ± 0.015 Cy | 4.38 ± 0.036 By |
| AICAR | 1.34 ± 0.122 fz | 2.57 ± 0.105 ez | 2.84 ± 0.115 dz | 5.96 ± 0.012 az | 4.31 ± 0.002 cz | 4.56 ± 0.101 bz |
One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analyses between the control group and two treatment groups at 0 h to 168 h (x, y, z p < 0.05). Duncan’s New Multiple-range test was used for the differences between the control group and two treatment groups at 0 h to 168 h. At 0 h, the lowercase letters represent the difference of the treatment group (a, b, c, d, e, f, p < 0.05), and the capital letters represent stands the difference of the control group over time (A, B, C, D, E, F, p < 0.05). Error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean.
Figure 3AMPK Activity of postmortem yak longissimus dorsal muscle. At a specific postmortem time, it indicates significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 4(A) Effects of intraperitoneal injection of AICAR and STO-609 on AMPK phosphorylation (Thr 172) in postmortem yak longissimus dorsi muscle. Representative immunoblots of AMPK phosphorylation and b-actin, and the relative band density of phospho-AMPK after normalizing to b-actin, are shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of AMPK expression of bovine muscle during postmortem aging.
Figure 5Effect of AICAR and STO-609 on AMPKα1(A), AMPKα2 (B) mRNA. The samples were treated with or without AICAR (10 mM) and STO-609 (10 mM) for the time as indicated above, and total RNA was subjected to real-time RT-PCR as described in Materials and Methods. The results are expressed as a relative value compared to the untreated sample as 100%. All data were represented as means ± SEM of three independent experiments. p < 0.05, compared with the untreated control.