Literature DB >> 32142807

Low leg compliance permits grounded running at speeds where the inverted pendulum model gets airborne.

Emanuel Andrada1, Reinhard Blickhan2, Naomichi Ogihara3, Christian Rode4.   

Abstract

Animals typically switch from grounded (no flight phases) to aerial running at dimensionless speeds u^ < 1. But some birds use grounded running far above u^ = 1, which puzzles biologists because the inverted pendulum becomes airborne at this speed. Here, we combine computer experiments using the spring-mass model with locomotion data from small birds, macaques and humans to understand the relationship between leg function (stiffness, angle of attack), locomotion speed and gait. With our model, we found three-humped ground reaction force profiles for slow grounded running speeds. The minimal single-humped grounded running speed is u^ = 0.4. This speed value roughly coincides with the transition speed from vaulting to bouncing mechanics in bipeds. Maximal grounded running speed in the model is not limited. In experiments, animals changed from grounded to aerial running at dimensionless contact time around 1. Considering these real-world contact times reduces the solution space drastically, but experimental data fit well. The model still predicts maximal grounded running speed  u^ > 1 for low stiffness values used by birds but decreases below u^ = 1 for increasing stiffness. For stiffer legs used in human walking and running, periodic grounded running vanishes. At speeds at which birds and macaques change to aerial running, we found periodic aerial running to intersect grounded running. This could explain why animals can alternate between grounded and aerial running at the same speed and identical leg parameters. Compliant legs enable different gaits and speeds with similar leg parameters, stiff legs require parameter adaptations.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Bouncing mechanics; Gait transition; Locomotion; SLIP

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32142807     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  1 in total

1.  Limb, joint and pelvic kinematic control in the quail coping with steps upwards and downwards.

Authors:  Emanuel Andrada; Oliver Mothes; Heiko Stark; Matthew C Tresch; Joachim Denzler; Martin S Fischer; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.