| Literature DB >> 32142215 |
Remi Kuwabara1, Tatsuhiko Urakami1, Kei Yoshida1, Ichiro Morioka1.
Abstract
We encountered a 12-year-old boy with type 2 diabetes who was born small-for-gestational age. We described his clinical characteristics and a possible etiological factor for development of hyperglycemia. He developed well with sufficient nutrition and progressed to being overweight at 6 years-of-age as a result of a high-calorie, high-protein intake diet. He showed a diabetic pattern with a normal insulin response on an oral glucose tolerance test carried out with the urine glucose screening program at schools. He showed a large total fat area of 239.4 cm2 ; in particular, his visceral fat area was 103.0 cm2 with a high ratio of visceral fat area to subcutaneous fat area (0.76). The present case might show that insulin resistance, possibly as a result of accumulation of a great amount of visceral fat, might be attributed to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes in children born small-for-gestational age.Entities:
Keywords: Small-for-gestational age; Type 2 diabetes; Visceral fat
Year: 2020 PMID: 32142215 PMCID: PMC7477531 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Laboratory data and results of the oral glucose tolerance test in the present patient
| HbA1c (%) | 6.7 |
| Glycated albumin (%) | 15.7 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 154 |
| HDL‐C (mg/dL) | 42 |
| LDL‐C (mg/dL) | 102 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 35 |
| AST (IU/L) | 30 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 44 |
| Plasma glucose (mg/dL) | |
| 0 min | 92 |
| 30 min | 117 |
| 60 min | 173 |
| 90 min | 189 |
| 120 min | 204 |
| IRI (µU/mL) | |
| 0 min | 4.5 |
| 30 min | 10.9 |
| 60 min | 18.9 |
| 90 min | 21 |
| 120 min | 17.2 |
| HOMA‐IR | 1.0 |
| HOMA‐β | 55.9 |
| △IRI/△PG | 0.3 |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA‐IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA‐β, the homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function; IRI, immunoreactive insulin; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; PG, plasma glucose; TC, total cholesterol.
Figure 1Computed tomography at the umbilical level for assessing total fat area, subcutaneous fat area and visceral fat area.
Figure 2Clinical course and treatment in the present patient. HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; IRI, immunoreactive insulin; PG, plasma glucose.