Literature DB >> 32141834

Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Adolescents' Perspectives on Combining Technologies for Physical Activity Promotion Within an Intervention: Usability Study.

Mark Drehlich1, Michael Naraine2, Katie Rowe2, Samuel K Lai1, Jo Salmon1, Helen Brown1, Harriet Koorts1, Susie Macfarlane3, Nicola D Ridgers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wearable activity trackers and social media have been identified as having the potential to increase physical activity among adolescents, yet little is known about the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of the technology by adolescents.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to use the technology acceptance model to explore adolescents' acceptance of wearable activity trackers used in combination with social media within a physical activity intervention.
METHODS: The Raising Awareness of Physical Activity study was a 12-week physical activity intervention that combined a wearable activity tracker (Fitbit Flex) with supporting digital materials that were delivered using social media (Facebook). A total of 124 adolescents aged 13 to 14 years randomized to the intervention group (9 schools) participated in focus groups immediately post intervention. Focus groups explored adolescents' perspectives of the intervention and were analyzed using pen profiles using a coding framework based on the technology acceptance model.
RESULTS: Adolescents reported that Fitbit Flex was useful as it motivated them to be active and provided feedback about their physical activity levels. However, adolescents typically reported that Fitbit Flex required effort to use, which negatively impacted on their perceived ease of use. Similarly, Facebook was considered to be a useful platform for delivering intervention content. However, adolescents generally noted preferences for using alternative social media websites, which may have impacted on negative perceptions concerning Facebook's ease of use. Perceptions of technological risks included damage to or loss of the device, integrity of data, and challenges with both Fitbit and Facebook being compatible with daily life.
CONCLUSIONS: Wearable activity trackers and social media have the potential to impact adolescents' physical activity levels. The findings from this study suggest that although the adolescents recognized the potential usefulness of the wearable activity trackers and the social media platform, the effort required to use these technologies, as well as the issues concerning risks and compatibility, may have influenced overall engagement and technology acceptance. As wearable activity trackers and social media platforms can change rapidly, future research is needed to examine the factors that may influence the acceptance of specific forms of technology by using the technology acceptance model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000899448; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370716. ©Mark D Drehlich, Michael Naraine, Katie Rowe, Samuel K Lai, Jo Salmon, Helen Brown, Harriet Koorts, Susie Macfarlane, Nicola D Ridgers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.03.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fitness trackers; physical activity; social media; youth

Year:  2020        PMID: 32141834     DOI: 10.2196/15552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  8 in total

1.  Effect of commercial wearables and digital behaviour change resources on the physical activity of adolescents attending schools in socio-economically disadvantaged areas: the RAW-PA cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicola D Ridgers; Anna Timperio; Kylie Ball; Samuel K Lai; Helen Brown; Susie Macfarlane; Jo Salmon
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.457

2.  Latent classes associated with the intention to use a symptom checker for self-triage.

Authors:  Stephanie Aboueid; Samantha B Meyer; James Wallace; Ashok Chaurasia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Modeling the Intention and Adoption of Wearable Fitness Devices: A Study Using SEM-PLS Analysis.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Abdullah Al Mamun; Naeem Hayat; Gao Jingzu; Mohammad Enamul Hoque; Anas A Salameh
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Football Fandom as a Platform for Digital Health Promotion and Behaviour Change: A Mobile App Case Study.

Authors:  Alex Fenton; Anna Mary Cooper-Ryan; Mariann Maz Hardey; Wasim Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Understanding Australian adolescent girls' use of digital technologies for healthy lifestyle purposes: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Kate Parker; Laura Gould; Meenal Nand; Jonathan C Rawstorn; Ana Maria Contardo Ayala; Ralph Maddison; Kim Toffoletti
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Qualitative study measuring the usability of the International Cardiac Rehabilitation Registry.

Authors:  Hana J Abukhadijah; Karam I Turk-Adawi; Nora Dewart; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 7.  The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of Wearable Activity Trackers for Increasing Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amy V Creaser; Stacy A Clemes; Silvia Costa; Jennifer Hall; Nicola D Ridgers; Sally E Barber; Daniel D Bingham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Exploring Families' Acceptance of Wearable Activity Trackers: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Amy V Creaser; Jennifer Hall; Silvia Costa; Daniel D Bingham; Stacy A Clemes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.