Sinwook Park1, Gilad Yossifon1. 1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Micro- and Nanofluidics Laboratory, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City 3200000, Israel.
Abstract
Previous micromotor-based biosensing studies used to functionalize the surface of the micromotor with specific molecular probes for binding of target analyte, thus limiting the use of the micromotor for the specific target. In contrast, here, we introduce a novel approach of using a nonfunctionalized micromotor as a generic cargo carrier being able to perform label-free and dynamic loading, transport, and release of functionalized beads. Hence, such an approach enables one to use the same micromotor system for sensing of varying targets via different commercially available functionalized beads, demonstrating the use of micromotors as a practical and versatile means for biosensing. We have also introduced a simplified microfluidic design that can be used for immunosensing or DNA binding tests without necessity for complicated fluid handling (buffer exchange, washing, etc.) steps. We expect this approach to open up new realizations of simplified and generic biosensing platforms.
Previous micromotor-based biosensing studies used to functionalize the surface of the micromotor with specific molecular probes for binding of target analyte, thus limiting the use of the micromotor for the specific target. In contrast, here, we introduce a novel approach of using a nonfunctionalized micromotor as a generic cargo carrier being able to perform label-free and dynamic loading, transport, and release of functionalized beads. Hence, such an approach enables one to use the same micromotor system for sensing of varying targets via different commercially available functionalized beads, demonstrating the use of micromotors as a practical and versatile means for biosensing. We have also introduced a simplified microfluidic design that can be used for immunosensing or DNA binding tests without necessity for complicated fluid handling (buffer exchange, washing, etc.) steps. We expect this approach to open up new realizations of simplified and generic biosensing platforms.
The reliable
identification
of the target analytes using lab-on-a-chip technology promises an
enormous potential in the fields of environmental monitoring, food
testing, food/water safety monitoring, and clinical analysis.[1] In particular, the emerging field of self-propulsion
(i.e., “active” particles) combined with microfluidics
offers new opportunities for realization of novel micromotor-based
biosensing, targeted drug delivery, and cell manipulation/isolation
for biomedical application.[2−7] Active particles that convert energy at the particle level from
the surrounding environment (e.g., chemical fuel,[8−11] light,[12,13] ultrasound,[14] magnetic field,[15−18] and electric field[19−21]) into autonomous self-propulsion enables efficient
coverage of large areas and volumes while operating under uniform
ambient conditions without the need to generate field gradients for
driving the particles.By using different materials and surface
coating techniques (e.g.,
molecularly imprinted polymers,[8,22] biodegradable and biocompatible
polymers,[23] and biomimetic material[24]), the active particles coated with biodegradable
materials or functionalized with bioreceptors have been proven to
be useful for various tasks such as antibacterial activity,[23] protein detection,[25] and intracellular biosensing of a target miRNA expressed in intact
cancer cells.[26] As one notable approach,
García et al.[8] demonstrated micromotor-based
immunoassay using self-propelled antibody-functionalized micromotors
where the different immunoassay steps are obtained via the mobile
particle translating between different reservoirs connected using
microfluidic channels. This concept eliminates the need to manipulate
fluids as common to lab-on-a-chip devices; thus, the washing step
is obtained by the motion of the particle itself within the stagnant
fluid. However, the coating of the active particle with antibodies
makes these micromotors specific and less generic in application.Here, we demonstrate a generic approach using a nonlabeled micromotor
that can selectively load, transport, and release functionalized beads
(i.e., treated as cargo) singularly controlled by an external alternating
electric field. We use spherical metallodielectric Janus particle
(JPs) as the micromotor,[19,21,27,28] where under an applied electric
field, the imbalanced polarization at metallic and dielectric hemispheres
results in self-propulsive behavior referred to induced-charge electrophoresis
(ICEP)[29,30] and self-dielectrophoresis (sDEP).[19] Both the speed and direction of the JP are controlled
by the applied electric field frequency, with the JP propelling either
with its dielectric (ICEP) or metallic (sDEP) hemisphere forward.[19,28,29]The underlying mechanism
of the cargo manipulation used in the
current work is dielectrophoresis (DEP), which enables label-free
loading and release of a broad range of organic and inorganic cargos.[20] Under a uniform external electric field, the
field gradients, necessary for DEP force, are induced at the JP level.
By varying the electric field frequency, a cargo particle can shift
between attraction (i.e., positive DEP, pDEP) and repulsion (i.e.,
negative DEP, nDEP) at regions of high electric field intensity according
to its geometry and material properties.[31−33] Thus, combining
an electrically powered micromotor and DEP-based cargo manipulation
enables us to use a uniform electric field to singularly control the
selective loading, transport, and release of the functionalized beads
in a simple and robust manner. Adding magnetic steering, using a ferromagnetic
coating of the JPs with an externally rotating static magnet, enabled
us also to precisely navigate the micromotor.[34−36]Here,
we present micromotor-based biosensing using simplified microfluidic
devices consisting of either a single chamber (Figure ) or two chambers with connecting microchannel
(Figure ). As described
in the schematics in Figure , the micromotor first loads the functionalized beads as cargos
and then transports them toward the sample of the target analyte for
some certain incubation time for its “on-the-fly” binding
with specific molecular probes that are functionalized on the surface
of the beads. This is followed by a washing step wherein the beads
are transported into a region free of the target analyte for visualization
of the binding before release. The micromotor can be reused to load
and transport new cargos following release of the previously transported
cargos. Without loss of generality, we used biotin-avidin with high
affinity as a simplified model for immunosensing or protein and nucleic
acid detection. While micromotor-based cargo loading was previously
studied,[20,35,36] herein, we
investigate for the first time its applicability for biosensing using
commercially available functionalized microbeads. This involves consideration
of the diffusion of the analyte within the microfluidic chamber and
the dependency of the bimolecular binding between the target analyte
and surface-immobilized probes on the analyte concentration as well
as the retention time within the region where the analyte is introduced.
Figure 3
Transport of biotin-functionalized cargos using a micromotor for
sensing of avidin within a single chamber system. (a) Schematics of
the biosensing procedure including (i) micromotor loading several
cargos while transporting them from zone IV to zone I for binding
with avidin, (ii) incubation time of 5 min, and (iii) transport of
cargo to the avidin-free region (zones I to IV) for washing nonspecifically
bound molecules and detection of avidin-biotin binding. The inset
depicts the cross-sectional side view of the system along the orange
dashed line a–a′. (b) Time-lapse microscopy bright field
(top row) and fluorescence (second row) images showing the micromotor-based
transport of cargos across the different zones. The applied electric
field is 500 kHz and 10 Vpp with sDEP and nDEP cargo trapping
mode (see Supplementary Video S3). The
inset schematics in bright field images indicate the approximate location
of transport of the micromotor with cargos within the entire chamber,
while the yellow dotted circles indicate the location of the active
carrier with cargos in the fluorescence field images. The bright and
fluorescence field images were taken at similar times but with a small
time difference of 1–3 s between them. White scale bar: 15
μm.
Figure 5
Transport of
biotin-functionalized beads using a micromotor in
a two chamber microfluidic system. (a) Schematics and a microscopy
image of the microfluidic system (top right inset). In reservoir A,
similarly to the format in Figure , the avidin molecules (200 μg mL–1) are introduced into one of the inlet holes for binding biotin-functionalized
particles for 20 min of incubation time. (b) Following incubation,
a micromotor in reservoir A picks up avidin-bound biotin particles
and transports them toward reservoir B. (c) Crossing the connecting
microchannel (3.5 mm long) between the two reservoirs. The time interval
between two superimposed images in b and c is 1 sec. The blue arrow
indicates the direction of motion. (d) Bright field and fluorescence
images of transported cargos at reservoir B. White, black, and yellow
scale bars: 500, 100, and 10 μm, respectively.
Figure 1
Schematic
illustration of the concept of micromotor-based biosensing
by cargo manipulation and transport of functionalized beads. (a) A
Janus particle picks up biotin-functionalized beads and transports
them to selected regions. An electric field is used for both JP propulsion
and cargo manipulation (negative DEP trapping), while a magnetic field
is used for steering of the JP. The metallic coated (Cr/Ni/Au) is
colored yellow, while the nonfluorescent bare polystyrene hemisphere
is colored dark gray. The red- and gray-colored cargos indicate the
biotin-functionalized particles with and without avidin-biotin binding,
respectively. (b) Biotin-avidin reactions are used as a simplified
model of immunosensing and DNA biosensing, wherein the biotin-coated
beads bind to avidin molecules that are introduced into the sample
solution.
Schematic
illustration of the concept of micromotor-based biosensing
by cargo manipulation and transport of functionalized beads. (a) A
Janus particle picks up biotin-functionalized beads and transports
them to selected regions. An electric field is used for both JP propulsion
and cargo manipulation (negative DEP trapping), while a magnetic field
is used for steering of the JP. The metallic coated (Cr/Ni/Au) is
colored yellow, while the nonfluorescent bare polystyrene hemisphere
is colored dark gray. The red- and gray-colored cargos indicate the
biotin-functionalized particles with and without avidin-biotin binding,
respectively. (b) Biotin-avidin reactions are used as a simplified
model of immunosensing and DNA biosensing, wherein the biotin-coated
beads bind to avidin molecules that are introduced into the sample
solution.
Results and Discussion
Cargo Loading and Transport
Here, we characterized
the cargo (biotin-coated beads) manipulation (i.e., loading, transport,
and release). A 10 μm-diameter Ni-Au-coated Janus particle was
used as a micromotor within an indium tin oxide (ITO)-sandwiched microchamber
wherein the bottom ITO-coated glass slide was covered with thin silicon
dioxide layer to suppress adsorption of particles onto the substrate[27] (more details are given in the Supporting Information).
In particular, we examined the effect of the conductivity of a phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) solution on the micromotor velocity (Figure b and Figure S1). As shown, the electrokinetic propulsion of the JP becomes
ineffective at high solution conductivities (>1 mS/cm; see Figure S1). The chosen solution conductivity
at which we performed the study was 0.01% (v/v) PBS at which the JPs
move fast enough (Figure b and Figure S1) to shorten the
translocation time between the different regions but also enable sufficiently
strong biotin-avidin binding affinity.
Figure 2
Characterization of self-propulsion
of Janus particle and cargo
transport of biotin-coated particles. (a) Superimposed sequential
microscopy images showing the transport of 10 μm (in diameter)
Cr/Ni/Au-coated Janus particle suspended in deionized (D.I.) water
and 0.01% diluted PBS with conductivity (σ = 180 μS cm–1). The JP motion is due to ICEP (polystyrene (PS)
hemisphere forward) and sDEP (Au hemisphere forward) at electric field
frequencies of 10 and 500 kHz, respectively. The red arrows indicate
the direction of motion of the JP, and the time interval between superimposed
images is 2 s. (b) Frequency dispersion of the Janus particle mobility
at various solutions. The black line indicates the Clausius–Mossotti
(CM) factor of a 3.5 μm (in diameter) biotin-coated particles
(cargos) in 0.01% PBS (σ = 180 μS cm–1) as extracted from their DEP response. (c) Superimposed images showing
the pickup process of cargos by a single JP suspended in 0.01% diluted
PBS. The applied electric field is 500 kHz and 20 Vpp,
which results in sDEP-dominated JP propulsion and nDEP-trapped cargos
that assemble on the equator of the JP (see Supplementary Video S1). The red arrow indicates the direction of the JP
steered by magnetic force. (d) Carrier velocity vs the number of cargos
under the electric field of 500 kHz and 10 Vpp. The bottom
insets depict the distribution of the electric field around the JP,
as obtained from the numerical simulations and corresponding locations
where positive and negative DEP trapping of cargo can occur. Microscopy
images in the insets depict varying number of nDEP-trapped cargos.
Scale bars: 10 μm.
Characterization of self-propulsion
of Janus particle and cargo
transport of biotin-coated particles. (a) Superimposed sequential
microscopy images showing the transport of 10 μm (in diameter)
Cr/Ni/Au-coated Janus particle suspended in deionized (D.I.) water
and 0.01% diluted PBS with conductivity (σ = 180 μS cm–1). The JP motion is due to ICEP (polystyrene (PS)
hemisphere forward) and sDEP (Au hemisphere forward) at electric field
frequencies of 10 and 500 kHz, respectively. The red arrows indicate
the direction of motion of the JP, and the time interval between superimposed
images is 2 s. (b) Frequency dispersion of the Janus particle mobility
at various solutions. The black line indicates the Clausius–Mossotti
(CM) factor of a 3.5 μm (in diameter) biotin-coated particles
(cargos) in 0.01% PBS (σ = 180 μS cm–1) as extracted from their DEP response. (c) Superimposed images showing
the pickup process of cargos by a single JP suspended in 0.01% diluted
PBS. The applied electric field is 500 kHz and 20 Vpp,
which results in sDEP-dominated JP propulsion and nDEP-trapped cargos
that assemble on the equator of the JP (see Supplementary Video S1). The red arrow indicates the direction of the JP
steered by magnetic force. (d) Carrier velocity vs the number of cargos
under the electric field of 500 kHz and 10 Vpp. The bottom
insets depict the distribution of the electric field around the JP,
as obtained from the numerical simulations and corresponding locations
where positive and negative DEP trapping of cargo can occur. Microscopy
images in the insets depict varying number of nDEP-trapped cargos.
Scale bars: 10 μm.As shown in Figure a,b, there are two
modes of self-propulsion, where the JP moves with
its dielectric end forward under induced-charge electrophoresis (ICEP)
at low frequencies and with its metallic end forward (sDEP) beyond
a certain critical frequency. Also, the applied electric field frequency
affects the dielectrophoretic response of the cargos, which transitions
from pDEP to nDEP response with increasing frequency beyond the crossover
frequency (COF) ∼10 kHz (Figure b).Here, we chose to use the sDEP propulsion
mode with nDEP cargo
trapping (500 kHz) due to the larger cargo loading capacity (there
is less hydrodynamic shear since electroconvection is significantly
reduced at such high frequencies) and the relatively large carrier
mobility. At lower frequency (5 kHz) with ICEP propulsion and pDEP
cargo trapping mode, the cargos were trapped only at the top of the
JP (see simulation inset in Figure d) due to its inability to penetrate underneath the
JP due to size limitation but transported with a nonsmooth motion
due to abrupt stops as a result of the loaded cargo (Figure S1). At the mode of sDEP and nDEP cargo trapping, the
micromotor with magnetic steering is directed to capture functionalized
beads in a consecutive manner with particles trapped on the equator
of its metallic hemisphere, as seen in (Figure c, schematic inset in Figure d, and Supplementary Video S1). Figure d depicts how the increased number of loaded cargo is decreasing
the mobility of the micromotor. This can be simply explained due to
the increased Stokes drag resulting from the enlarged areal cross
section of the loaded carrier due to the trapped cargos.[35,36] The maximal cargo loading capacity the micromotor is able to pick
up was ∼7 for the current operating conditions. However, the
maximal loading capacity can be changed depending on the JP size and
operating conditions (Figure S2, Figure S3, and Supplementary Video S2).
A Single Microfluidic Chamber Setup
Here, we demonstrate
our novel approach using a very simplified microfluidic setup consisting
of a single chamber made of a spacer and two drilled inlet holes for
introduction of the solution, functionalized beads, micromotor, and
sample analyte (Figure ). We can qualitatively differentiate between
several zones in between one of the inlets where the target sample
analyte is gently introduced and the other inlet which is free of
target analyte. Note that the distance between the two holes (∼6.5
mm) is far enough for the target analyte not to reach the other inlet
by diffusion during the whole process (∼180 h with an avidin
molecule diffusion coefficient of D ≈ 6.5
× 10–7 cm2 s–1[37]). The micromotors and cargos (i.e.,
functionalized beads) were first introduced uniformly within the chamber
before introducing the target analyte, although they could be as well
introduced only into the inlet far from the analyte after filling
the chamber with the solution. We have then used the micromotor to
trap the cargos to follow a path along the avidin molecule concentration
gradients for binding followed by a washing step. The binding of avidin
molecules to the biotin-coated beads did not seem to change their
DEP behavior in a way that necessitates readjustment of the operating
parameters. The time of incubation can be then controlled by either
increasing the retention time of the micromotor with loaded cargos
within region I of the highest avidin concentration or simply picking
up the beads within region I after some desired time (see Figure ). As seen in Figure b, a clear binding
event occurred between the avidin and the biotin-coated cargos following
an incubation time of ∼5 min. This shortened detection time,
relative to the long diffusion time of avidin within the chamber,
is clearly due to motion of the trapped cargos, via the micromotor,
to the region of high analyte concentration. This is further quantified
using different avidin concentrations to test the limit of detection
of the system, which proves that, for two cycles, concentration as
low as 2 μg/mL can be detected. It is expected that this can
be further improved by simply increasing the incubation time (Figure c). As a control,
we have used non-biotin-coated microparticles of the same size, which
showed no fluorescence signal when compared to the functionalized
beads (inset in Figure c).
Figure 4
Several cycles of transport of biofunctionalized
cargos within
a single chamber system. (a) Schematics describing two cycles of cargo
transport from zone I to zone IV (see Figure ). The color change from orange to red indicates
qualitatively the enhanced binding between avidin and biotin particles
with increasing incubation time in zone I. After releasing the cargos
at the end of the first cycle, the JP went back to zone I with propulsion
mode of ICEP (10 kHz and 20 Vpp) to prevent loading cargos
on the way (see Supplementary Video S4).
The incubation times of avidin-biotin binding are 5 and 25 min at
cycles 1 and 2, respectively. (b) Microscopy images of the transported
cargo at zone IV with bright field and fluorescence mode for various
initial avidin concentrations loaded at zone I. (c) Fluorescence intensity
of avidin bound to biotin-coated cargos vs various initial avidin
concentrations (A, B, and C) and two transport cycles (1 and 2). Microscopy
images in the inset show non-biotin-coated beads (i.e., cargos) at
zone IV under 200 μg mL–1 initial avidin concentration
and 25 min incubation time as a control test. White scale bar: 15
μm.
Transport of biotin-functionalized cargos using a micromotor for
sensing of avidin within a single chamber system. (a) Schematics of
the biosensing procedure including (i) micromotor loading several
cargos while transporting them from zone IV to zone I for binding
with avidin, (ii) incubation time of 5 min, and (iii) transport of
cargo to the avidin-free region (zones I to IV) for washing nonspecifically
bound molecules and detection of avidin-biotin binding. The inset
depicts the cross-sectional side view of the system along the orange
dashed line a–a′. (b) Time-lapse microscopy bright field
(top row) and fluorescence (second row) images showing the micromotor-based
transport of cargos across the different zones. The applied electric
field is 500 kHz and 10 Vpp with sDEP and nDEP cargo trapping
mode (see Supplementary Video S3). The
inset schematics in bright field images indicate the approximate location
of transport of the micromotor with cargos within the entire chamber,
while the yellow dotted circles indicate the location of the active
carrier with cargos in the fluorescence field images. The bright and
fluorescence field images were taken at similar times but with a small
time difference of 1–3 s between them. White scale bar: 15
μm.Several cycles of transport of biofunctionalized
cargos within
a single chamber system. (a) Schematics describing two cycles of cargo
transport from zone I to zone IV (see Figure ). The color change from orange to red indicates
qualitatively the enhanced binding between avidin and biotin particles
with increasing incubation time in zone I. After releasing the cargos
at the end of the first cycle, the JP went back to zone I with propulsion
mode of ICEP (10 kHz and 20 Vpp) to prevent loading cargos
on the way (see Supplementary Video S4).
The incubation times of avidin-biotin binding are 5 and 25 min at
cycles 1 and 2, respectively. (b) Microscopy images of the transported
cargo at zone IV with bright field and fluorescence mode for various
initial avidin concentrations loaded at zone I. (c) Fluorescence intensity
of avidin bound to biotin-coated cargos vs various initial avidin
concentrations (A, B, and C) and two transport cycles (1 and 2). Microscopy
images in the inset show non-biotin-coated beads (i.e., cargos) at
zone IV under 200 μg mL–1 initial avidin concentration
and 25 min incubation time as a control test. White scale bar: 15
μm.
Extension to More Complicated
Microchannel Geometries
Such a simplified microchamber that
does not necessitate any fabrication
except drilled holes can be further complicated while still kept simple
in terms of fabrication to include additional chambers if one, for
example wishes, to perform multiplex (i.e., involving different functionalized
beads), sandwich immunoassay, or several washing/buffer exchange/chemical
reaction steps.[8,38−41] To prove the applicability of
our generic micromotor-based functionalized cargo transport approach
also to these potential future realizations of biosensing, we have
fabricated a two-microchamber device with connecting microfluidic
channel fabricated using direct laser cutting (Figure and Supplementary Videos S5 and S6). It is clearly demonstrated that the JP can travel very long distances
(through the connecting microchannel) while transporting cargo.Transport of
biotin-functionalized beads using a micromotor in
a two chamber microfluidic system. (a) Schematics and a microscopy
image of the microfluidic system (top right inset). In reservoir A,
similarly to the format in Figure , the avidin molecules (200 μg mL–1) are introduced into one of the inlet holes for binding biotin-functionalized
particles for 20 min of incubation time. (b) Following incubation,
a micromotor in reservoir A picks up avidin-bound biotin particles
and transports them toward reservoir B. (c) Crossing the connecting
microchannel (3.5 mm long) between the two reservoirs. The time interval
between two superimposed images in b and c is 1 sec. The blue arrow
indicates the direction of motion. (d) Bright field and fluorescence
images of transported cargos at reservoir B. White, black, and yellow
scale bars: 500, 100, and 10 μm, respectively.
Conclusions
We have successfully demonstrated the ability
to perform label-free
and dynamic manipulation and transport of biotin-coated beads used
as cargo via a JP acting as an active carrier. We have examined the
ability to perform cargo loading under various solution conductivities
including one (i.e., PBS) that is relevant for the binding of biotin-avidin.
It was demonstrated that, using a single microfluidic chamber, simple
and robust biosensing could be realized with the advantages of a micromotor-based
approach avoiding the need for fluid handling as incubation time and
washing steps can be simply controlled by moving the carrier itself.
We have demonstrated the ability of transporting such a loaded carrier
for very long distances through a microchannel connecting between
two microchambers, which may be important for realizations of several
buffer exchange/washing steps and/or multiplex sensing. This approach
is applicable for a broad range of cargos from ∼100 nm size
to several micrometer size. It is also possible to use a mixed population
of cargos for multiplex biosensing where their loading/release can
be controlled individually by taking advantage of their unique polarizability
relative to the medium (i.e., Clausius–Mossotti factor) and
the associated different crossover frequencies (COFs) at which the
cargo switches between positive- and negative-DEP responses.[36]Although examined for the biotin-avidin
reaction, the approach
is generic and can be applied for any antibody–antigen or DNA–probe
combination. It can also be extended to include more microchambers
for several reagents and washing steps as, for example, in a sandwich
immunoassay where a reporting antibody is used for the fluorescence
signal following the antigen binding to the antibodies immobilized
on the surface of the cargos. Although we did not observe any significant
effect of the binding on the DEP behavior of the cargos such that
it necessitates tuning of the operating conditions, it is possible
to easily tune the operating frequency if there is such an effect.
The method is of particular use for low concentration of target analytes
where the fast transportation of the carrier and trapped cargo toward
the analyte region and away from it (i.e., washing step) enables fast
detection that otherwise would be long due to the slow diffusion processes.
Also, while we have demonstrated this using a single JP guided using
magnetic steering so as to precisely control its translocation between
the different regions and its incubation time within the region into
which the analyte is introduced (region I), an operation mode where
several such carriers are simultaneously operating autonomously (i.e.,
without magnetic steering) so as to enhance sampling of the analyte
(i.e., reducing the otherwise long diffusion time) is also possible.Due to the limitation of the electrokinetic propulsion to solution
conductivities lower than ∼1 mS/cm, we chose, in the current
study, a relatively low conductivity 0.01% (v/v) PBS solution at which
the JP moves fast with sufficiently strong biotin-avidin binding affinity.
However, since the cargo manipulation via DEP on the surface of the
JP is valid also at physiological solutions of higher conductivity,
it is only the propulsion mechanism that needs to be improved. One
option is to replace the electrokinetic propulsion by other means,
e.g., rotating magnetic field.[34,42] Another possible solutions
may be to suppress the quenching of the EDL to higher solution conductivity
by using highly ion-conductive polyelectrolyte coating.[43] We expect such a novel approach to open new
opportunities in realizing simplified micromotor-based biosensing
devices.
Authors: Soichiro Tottori; Li Zhang; Famin Qiu; Krzysztof K Krawczyk; Alfredo Franco-Obregón; Bradley J Nelson Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2012-01-02 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Miguel García; Jahir Orozco; Maria Guix; Wei Gao; Sirilak Sattayasamitsathit; Alberto Escarpa; Arben Merkoçi; Joseph Wang Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 7.790