Cell therapy and tissue engineering have been intensively researched for repair of articular cartilage. In this study, we investigated the chondrogenic potential of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) combined to high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HA) in vitro, and their therapeutic effect in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) associated with bilateral hip dysplasia. Canine ASCs were characterized after conventional 2D culture or 3D culture in HA, showing adequate immunophenotype, proliferation and trilineage differentiation, as well as chondrogenesis after cultivation in HA. ASC/HA constructs were used to treat 12 dogs with OA, sequentially assigned to control, ASC and ASC/HA groups. Animals were examined for clinical, orthopedic and radiological parameters. Lameness at walk and pain on manipulation were reduced in the ASC group and mainly in the ASC/HA group. Range of motion and detection of crepitus on hip rotation and abduction improved similarly in all groups. For articular edema, muscle atrophy, Norberg angle values and radiographic analyses, there were no variations throughout the period. These results indicate that ASC/HA constructs are safe and may be an effective therapeutic tool in treating canine chronic osteoarthritis, which should be confirmed with larger studies and additional clinical parameters.
Cell therapy and tissue engineering have been intensively researched for repair of articular cartilage. In this study, we investigated the chondrogenic potential of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) combined to high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HA) in vitro, and their therapeutic effect in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) associated with bilateral hip dysplasia. Canine ASCs were characterized after conventional 2D culture or 3D culture in HA, showing adequate immunophenotype, proliferation and trilineage differentiation, as well as chondrogenesis after cultivation in HA. ASC/HA constructs were used to treat 12 dogs with OA, sequentially assigned to control, ASC and ASC/HA groups. Animals were examined for clinical, orthopedic and radiological parameters. Lameness at walk and pain on manipulation were reduced in the ASC group and mainly in the ASC/HA group. Range of motion and detection of crepitus on hip rotation and abduction improved similarly in all groups. For articular edema, muscle atrophy, Norberg angle values and radiographic analyses, there were no variations throughout the period. These results indicate that ASC/HA constructs are safe and may be an effective therapeutic tool in treating caninechronic osteoarthritis, which should be confirmed with larger studies and additional clinical parameters.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease characterized by the progressive
deterioration of articular cartilage and structural changes to the entire synovial
joint. Also referred to as degenerative joint disease or osteoarthrosis, OA is one
of the most prevalent causes of severe pain and chronic physical disability in
humans and dogs (Vina and Kwoh, 2018). Since
the articular cartilage is hypocellular, avascular and aneural, the turnover of
extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules is very slow, which limits its repair capacity
(Varela-Eirin ). Current palliative treatments, including combinations of
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, nutraceuticals, functional foods,
physiotherapy and alternative therapies such as acupuncture, often do not provide
complete pain relief. Non-pharmaceutical treatment options may also include surgery,
weight loss, exercise modification, and physical therapy. Cell therapy and tissue
engineering have emerged as potential candidates, using cells such as mesenchymal
stromal cells or MSCs (Szychlinska ).MSCs exist in virtually all tissues and play a significant role in tissue repair and
regeneration (da Silva Meirelles , 2008).
Their high therapeutic potential is mainly due to their capacity to be activated by
signals secreted by injured tissues and production of bioactive molecules (da Silva Meirelles ). A large number of studies on the biological properties of MSCs have
shown their potential for the treatment of OA in humans, by increasing chondrocyte
proliferation rates and extracellular matrix production, as well as by their
immunomodulatory capacity (Kong ). Results from preclinical and clinical studies
show that intra-articular injection of MSCs can reduce pain and improve the joint’s
function, but also suggest that more studies are required for higher levels of
evidence (reviewed in Sasaki ; Wang ).The association of MSCs with three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds can increase their
therapeutic potential (reviewed in Szychlinska
). Many types of biomaterials have been
used, in the search for molecules with biological activity. Among them, hyaluronic
acid (HA), a large glycosaminoglycan present in the synovial fluid and with reduced
concentration in patients with knee OA (Balazs
; Altman,
2003), has been investigated. High molecular weight hyaluronic
preparation hylan GF-20, a commercially available hydrogel, is a cross-linked
preparation of hyaluronan with a molecular weight of 6,000 kDa (Pavelka and Uebelhart, 2011) which has been
successfully used as viscosupplementation for knee OA in humans and dogs (Pavelka and Uebelhart, 2011; Shen ; Carapeba ).
However, the effect of viscosupplementation is limited, so that it could be
increased and particularly extended for longer periods by the combination with
MSCs.The association of MSCs with HA to treat cartilage has been studied in different
species, mostly animal models. Although the treatments are safe and promising
results are observed, it is still not possible to draw conclusions on their real
benefits, due to the limitations inherent to artificial models and to the
heterogeneity and low quality of many of the clinical studies (Roffi ). It has been stressed that
the use of naturally occurring diseases in companion animals can provide more
reliable information in translational medicine (Kol
; Hoffman and Dow, 2016). The present work aimed at determining the
potential of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid to support the chondrogenic
differentiation of canine ASCs in vitro, as well as the therapeutic
potential of ASCs in combination with HA in dogs suffering from osteoarthritis.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Four healthy male dogs submitted to surgical intervention for procedures of
castration were used as donors of subcutaneous adipose tissue samples, with
prior signing of informed consent by the owners. Twelve dogs of different breeds
with bilateral OA of the hip joint were recruited for treatment, as detailed
below. The protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Universidade
Luterana do Brasil (no. 2016.82).
Reagents, culture media and solutions
Complete culture medium consisted of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)
supplemented with HEPES (free acid, 2.5–3.7 g/l) and 10% fetal bovine serum
(Life Technologies do Brasil, SP, Brazil). Hank’s balanced salt solution
containing 10 mM sodium HEPES (HBSS) was used for washing and resuspending the
cells. All reagents used in this study were from Sigma-Aldrich Brasil Ltda (SP,
Brazil), unless otherwise stated. Plasticware was from Greiner Bio-One Brasil
(SP, Brazil).
Isolation, culture and characterization of canine ASCs
Subcutaneous adipose tissue was digested with collagenase type I, and cultured at
37 °C as previously described (da Silva Meirelles
, 2016). Cells between passages 3 and 5 were used for all experiments
and for treating OAdogs, as described below. Experiments were done in
triplicate.ASCs were analyzed for morphology, surface phenotype, proliferation and
differentiation potential. Cultures were observed under an inverted
phase-contrast microscope (Axiovert 25, Zeiss, Hallbergmoos, Germany).
Photomicrographs were taken with a digital camera (AxioCam MRc, Zeiss), using
the AxioVision 3.1 software (Zeiss). Cell proliferation rate was assessed by
counting the number of cells recovered in each passage, as well as the time
elapsed. The results are expressed as the number of cells over the days of
culture.The trilineage differentiation potential of ASC cultures was analyzed by
incubation for up to 4 weeks with differentiation-inducing culture media (da Silva Meirelles ). Adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes were revealed with
specific staining solutions (Oil Red O, Alizarin Red S, and Alcian Blue,
respectively). All procedures had negative control cultures (undifferentiated
cultures).For immunophenotyping, cultures derived from one donor were analyzed in
triplicate. The cells were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with
antibodies specific for canineCD45, MHC class II or CD90 and conjugated with
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or R-phycoerythrin (PE) (eBioscience, La
Jolla, CA, USA). The cells were analyzed on an ACCURI C6 flow cytometer (Becton
Dickinson, USA). At least 10,000 events were collected, and the results were
analyzed with the BD Accuri C6 software.
Proliferation and differentiation of ASCs in HA constructs
For encapsulation in high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (Synvisc®, Sanofi
Brasil, Brazil), ASCs were resuspended in DMEM at 8 x 105 cells/mL,
mixed with HA at 1:10 (v:v) and dispensed into 24-well plates (0.5 ml/well).
After 3 h incubation at 37ºC for cell attachment, the scaffolds were transferred
to 12-well plates and submerged in control or chondrogenic-inducing medium. The
cell/HA constructs were maintained at 37 ºC with 5% CO2 for up to 28
days, with medium change every 3 or 4 days.After 3 days in culture, the proliferation of ASCs encapsulated in HA was
determined with a Quant-iT Pico-Green dsDNA kit (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen),
which allows quantitating double-stranded DNA. Measurements were performed using
a SpectraMax (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) plate reader at 485 nm
excitation and 535 nm emission wavelengths.Cultures were photographed as described above on days 7, 21 and 28 for analysis
of morphology. On day 28, the constructs were stained with 0.5% Alcian blue (pH
2.5), to detect production of cartilaginous matrix proteoglycans. Samples
collected for histological analysis were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and
embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections of 4-μm thickness were mounted on glass
slides and stained with Alcian blue. All sections were evaluated under light
microscope. Non-seeded HA scaffolds were also stained, as controls. ASCs from
three donors were analyzed, and experiments were done in triplicate.Sulphated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) were measured using the dimethyl blue (DMB)
technique. ASC-encapsulated constructs were collected on day 28 and digested
overnight in phosphate buffer 50 mM pH 6.5 with 0.24 g/L L-cysteine and 0.4%
EDTA 0.5 M. After mixing with chloroform and centrifuged at 10,000 x
g for 15 minutes, 4 °C, 25 μL of the supernatant was mixed
with freshly prepared DMB solution (DMB 0.3 mol/L with 2 mol/L Tris) and
absorbance was read at 530 nm in a plate reader (SpectraMax M3, Molecular
Devices). Protein content was determined using the Lowry method.
Treatment of dogs with chronic osteoarthritis
To investigate the therapeutic potential of ASCs and ASC/HA constructs in
osteoarthritis, ASCs alone or encapsulated in hyaluronic acid were used to treat
OA-affected dogs. Twelve adult client-owned dogs were included in the study.
Inclusion criteria were age (≤ 6 years old), lameness and pain due to OA
associated with bilateral hip dysplasia. Exclusion criteria were previous
surgery, any kind of treatment during the previous two months, dislocation of
the affected joint and presence of infections, cancer or other diseases which
could interfere with interpretation of the results.The animals were sequentially assigned to three groups (n = 4/group). ASCs and
ASC/hyaluronic acid constructs, prepared as described above, were used for all
dogs. The control group received a single intra-articular injection of 0.5 mL
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) per joint. The ASC group received 5 x
106 cells in 0.5 mL PBS per joint, and the ASC/HA group was
treated with 5 x 106 ASCs encapsulated in 0.5 mL hyaluronic acid per
joint. Dogs were sedated and injected into single, aseptically prepared sites on
both hip joints.On the first evaluation (day zero), the dogs were examined for clinical,
orthopedic and radiological parameters. Clinical and orthopedic results were
independently evaluated by two veterinarians, blinded to treatment allocation,
on days 7, 30, 60 and 90 after treatment, and another radiographic examination
was performed on day 90. The clinical and orthopedic examination used a
numerical rating scale, in which lameness, pain on manipulation, articular
edema, range of motion and muscle atrophy were scored from 0 to 3 (or to 4, in
the case of lameness) according to the severity of symptoms. The detection of
crepitus on hip rotation and abduction was also evaluated. The score ranged from
1 (no crepitus) to 5 (crepitus with increasing degree of pain sensation).Ventrodorsal radiographs were taken on days 0, 30, 60 and 90 and evaluated
according to the evidences of instability or degenerative changes of the hip
joint. Norberg angle values were measured from the hip extended view (Culp ).
Statistical analyses
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed and graphs
were generated using the Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA,
USA). Data were tested for normality and analyzed by one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. A p-value
less than 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.
Results
Characterization of canine ASCs
Cells had the characteristic fibroblast morphology of mesenchymal-type stem cells
and showed tri-lineage differentiation potential (Figure 1A). The cells expanded rapidly for a period of 40 days, when
the expansion rate decreased (Figure 1B).
Cells were negative for CD45 and MCH class II antigens, and positive for CD90
(Figure 1C).
Figure 1
(A) Representative photographs showing the trilineage differentiation
capacity of canine ASCs; control cultures were maintained in normal
medium. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) ASC proliferation rate along 60 days of
culture. (C) Immunophenotype of canine ASCs (n = 1, analyzed in
triplicate). Representative results show that cultures were negative for
CD45 and MHC class II, and positive for CD90.
Characterization of ASC/HA constructs
The proliferation rate of ASCs cultured for 3 days in the HA, as well as control
cultures maintained in the conventional 2D system, were fluorometrically
assessed by the PicoGreen assay. ASCs from 3 donors were analyzed, and the
assays were performed in triplicate. Cells cultured in HA had proliferation
rates similar to control cultures (Figure
2).These results were also observed when the GAG contents were determined
in ASC-encapsulated constructs cultured for 28 days (Figure 5). GAGs were significantly more abundant in
constructs cultured with chondrogenic-inducing medium.
Figure 2
Proliferation rate of canine ASCs cultured for 3 days in normal 2D
conditions (Control) or encapsulated in HA, assessed by DNA assay (n =
3).
Figure 5
GAG (μg) quantification normalized to protein concentration (mg) of
ASC-HA constructs cultured for 28 days (n=3). **p <
0.01.
Figure 3
Phase contrast aspect of ASCs encapsulated in HA and cultured for 7,
21 or 28 days in normal medium (A, B, C) or chondrogenic-inducing medium
(D, E, F). Scale bars = 100 μm.
Figure 4
Chondrogenic matrix stained with Alcian blue in encapsulated ASC/HA
constructs cultured for 28 days in normal (A) or chondrogenic-inducing
(B) medium. A weak background staining can be seen in HA alone (C). (D)
Detail of a more dense chondrogenic structure which can also be observed
in the constructs. Original magnification x200 (A and B) or x100 (C and
D).
ASC-encapsulated HA constructs were also analyzed histologically, after 28 days
culture in chondrogenic-inducing medium. Sections stained with Alcian blue
showed in greater detail the chondrogenic phenotype of the constructs (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Representative cross-section images of encapsulated ASC/HA constructs
cultured for 28 days with chondrogenic-inducing medium, stained with
Alcian blue. (A , B, C) Different aspects of the chondrogenic matrix.
(D) Control (Synvisc® alone). Original magnification x100.
Treatment of dogs with OA
Twelve dogs were included in the study (Table
1). Each joint was considered as an independent sample, considering
their individual characteristics, and were treated and assessed individually.
The results of the evaluations by two veterinarians on day 0 and days 7, 30, 60
and 90 after treatment, were analyzed as described above.
Table 1
Basic characteristics of dogs included in the study.
Groupa
Breed
Sex
Age
Weight (kg)
Control
German shepherd
Female
5 years
33
Border collie
Male
3 years
30
Undefined
Male
11 months
27
Golden retriever
Female
3 years
30
ASC
Pit bull
Female
5 years
26
Border collie
Female
7 months
13
Cimarron
Male
1 year
32
Rottweiler
Female
1 year
51
ASC/HA
German shepherd
Male
2 years
30
Undefined
Male
8 months
9
Golden retriever
Male
2 years
36
Undefined
Male
3 years
53
Control: treated with PBS; ASC: treated with adipose tissue-derived
mesenchymal stem cells; ASC/HA: treated with ASCs + hyaluronic
acid.
Control: treated with PBS; ASC: treated with adipose tissue-derived
mesenchymal stem cells; ASC/HA: treated with ASCs + hyaluronic
acid.No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed by
investigator for any outcome variable, so the data were pooled together. No
adverse events related to the procedure or the treatments were observed during
all the follow-up period. Lameness at walk remained unchanged in control
animals, but was reduced in the ASC group (p < 0.05 on day
90 comparing to day 0) and mainly in the ASC/HA group (p <
0.05 on days 60 and 90 comparing to day 0) (Figure
7A). A similar pattern was observed for pain on manipulation, with an
earlier (30 days) and more intense effect (p < 0.01) in
animals treated with ASCs + hyaluronic acid (Figure 7B). Range of motion and detection of crepitus on hip
rotation and abduction showed continuous improvement in all groups, but without
significant differences (Figure 7C and 7D).
For articular edema and muscle atrophy, there were no variations throughout the
period in different groups (not shown). Radiographic analyses (not shown), as
well as Norberg angle measurements (Table
2), did not show any differences when pretreatment results were
compared to results on days 30, 60 and 90.
Figure 7
Results of baseline (day 0) or follow-up (days 30, 60 and 90)
evaluations of patients in groups control (treated with PBS), ASC
(treated with adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells) and
ASC/HA (treated with ASCs + hyaluronic acid). * p < 0.05; ** p <
0.001, ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.
Table 2
Norberg angle measurements before treatment and on follow-up.
Groupa
Day 0
Day 30
Day 60
Day 90
Control
102.8 ± 9.7
106.0 ± 12.2
106.5 ± 12.1
105.4 ± 14.2
ASC
82.2 ± 14.5
82.1 ± 13.3
83.0 ± 11.3
82.6 ± 12.3
ASC/HA
83.4 ± 10.0
82.5 ± 11.2
83.1 ± 12.2
82.1 ± 11.7
Control: treated with PBS; ASC: treated with adipose tissue-derived
mesenchymal stem cells; ASC/HA: treated with ASCs + hyaluronic
acid.
Control: treated with PBS; ASC: treated with adipose tissue-derived
mesenchymal stem cells; ASC/HA: treated with ASCs + hyaluronic
acid.
Discussion
Mesenchymal stem cells have attracted much attention for their potential in tissue
engineering, mainly due to their plasticity and secretion of paracrine factors with
regenerative functions (Im, 2018). The cells
isolated from canine adipose tissue and cultured in the present study were analyzed
for morphology, surface profile, proliferation and trilineage differentiation, with
results that characterize them as cells of the mesenchymal lineage (Konno ). Of
particular importance for the treatment of osteoarthritis, canine ASCs
differentiated readily into the chondrogenic lineage, similar to previously
published results (Marx ).The behaviour of ASCs encapsulated in high molecular weight hyaluronic acid was
followed during in vitro culture. The cells distributed
homogeneously into the HA scaffold, in a 3D configuration. Encapsulation is the more
frequently used cell seeding system in this kind of material, since their structure
controls cell distribution and ECM diffusion, providing a more adequate environment
for tissue engineering (Nicodemus and Bryant,
2008). The 3D cell distribution is important in determining the success
of tissue-engineering products, allowing for instance the movement of cells away
from the construct to promote chondral integration with the surrounding cartilage
(Wu ).Hyaluronic acid has been used to construct hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering
in different combination. A hybrid scaffold combining HA hydrogel with porous
poly(e-caprolactone) showed mechanical properties similar to that of human articular
cartilage and the ability to maintain the viability, proliferation and phenotype of
seeded chondrocytes (Mintz and Cooper, 2014).
The proliferation, chondrogenic differentiation and therapeutic potential of
mesenchymal stem/stromal cells derived from the bone marrow (de Vries-van Melle ) or adipose
tissue (Wang )
of different species were increased by culture in HA-pNIPAM (poly(N-isopropyl
acrylamide) side-chains), HA/Fibrin and HA-PNIPAAm-CL (poly(N- isopropylacrylamide))
(de Vries-van Melle ; Wang ; Wu ), but not in alginate/HA (de
Vries-van Melle ).The combination ASC-HA was used for further in vivo investigation in
dogs with chronic osteoarthritis. Twelve adult dogs of different breeds, with
lameness and pain due to OA associated with bilateral hip dysplasia, were treated
with a single intra-articular injection of PBS (control group), 5 x 106
allogeneic ASCs (ASC group) or 5 x 106 ASCs encapsulated in hyaluronic
acid (ASC/HA group). No modifications in articular edema, muscle atrophy, Norberg
angle or radiographic analyses were observed in the 90-day follow-up period.
Interestingly, the randomization process allocated dogs with higher NA values to the
control group, resulting in a slightly better evolution of this grupo, although the
differences were not statistically significant. These results reflect the need for a
larger sample number in this kind of study.Lameness at walk was improved in treated dogs, particularly in the ASC/HA group. A
similar pattern was observed for pain on manipulation, with an earlier and more
intense effect in ASC/HA animals.Different animal species have been used in preclinical cell therapy studies, but
there are few reports on the use of mesenchymal stem cells to treat spontaneously
occurring diseases in veterinary patients. A recent review described only seven
reports of cell therapy in dogs, two in cats, and four in horses, published until
2015 (Marx ).
Among the canine studies, six involved treatment of orthopedic conditions, reporting
in general clinical improvement after the therapy (Marx ). A more recent study described the
treatment of 39 dogs suffering from elbow dysplasia and osteoarthritis with
allogeneic ASCs, reporting highly significant clinical improvement after one year
(Kriston-Pál ). A larger study has also described beneficial effects of ASC
treatment in osteoarthritis. Among 203 dogs with degenerative arthritis treated with
allogeneic ASCs by intra-articular and/or intravenous injections, 88% showed
improvement in clinical symptoms, whereas 12% did not exhibit any change. The
response was significantly linked to the age of the animal, with excellent
improvement in 90% of young dogs (< 9 years) and 60% of older dogs (Shah ). Despite
the large sample, this study had no control group and the number of injected cells,
or vehicle used, are not described, limiting the significance of the results.Although positive results have been described with the administration of cells
suspended in saline or culture medium, as described above, the use of a carrier such
as hydrogels or other types of biomaterials, particularly with chondroinductive
properties such as hyaluronic acid, is expected to increase the efficacy of the
therapy. Knee viscosupplementation by intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid
is a well established treatment to control primary OA symptoms (Bowman ). A few
studies have investigated the therapeutic potential of hyaluronic acid in canineosteoarthritis. In a double-blinded trial with 10 dogs with bilateral elbow OA, an
intra-articular injection of HA supplemented with methylprednisolone was as
effective as autologous conditioned plasma in improving lameness in up to 24 weeks
after injection (Franklin and Cook, 2013).
The efficacy of the intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection was also compared to
traditional conservative treatment in 16 dogs with osteoarthritis. Clinical
parameters improved in the HA-treated group from 15 to 90 and 60 to 90 days,
compared to the control group (Carapeba ).In humans, some studies have already described the use of HA as a carrier for
therapeutic cells in osteoarthritis (Park ) and chronic discogenic low back pain (Kumar ), or the
administration of MSCs followed by hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritic patients (Lee ; Lamo-Espinosa ),
with positive results. To our knowledge, there is only one report of a similar use
of ASCs plus HA in dogs with spontaneously developed osteoarthritis. Two dogs with
OA of the humeroradial joints received one intra-articular injection of autologous
ASCs with Hyalgan (20 mg/2 ml; Fidia), showing functional improvements in lameness
and pain on manipulation after one month (Guercio
). The combination MSCs/HA has also been
tested in dogs with a surgically induced cartilage defect, resulting in more
cartilage-like tissue and significant improvement in cartilage lesions than HA alone
or saline (Li ).The results of this study suggest a role for ASC/HA constructs in the treatment of
cartilage defects, for their chondroinductive properties in vitro
and effect in the treatment of canineosteoarthritis associated to hip dysplasia.
These results contribute also for the development of therapeutic tools for OA in
humans. Larger studies with more objective clinical evaluations, such as gait
analysis and arthroscopic evaluation, are needed to validate the use of the
combination of mesenchymal stromal cells and hyaluronic acid to treat chronic
osteoarthritis.
Authors: M L de Vries-van Melle; M S Tihaya; N Kops; W J L M Koevoet; J M Murphy; J A N Verhaar; M Alini; D Eglin; G J V M van Osch Journal: Eur Cell Mater Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Marta A Szychlinska; Martin J Stoddart; Ugo D'Amora; Luigi Ambrosio; Mauro Alini; Giuseppe Musumeci Journal: Tissue Eng Part B Rev Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 6.389
Authors: José María Lamo-Espinosa; Gonzalo Mora; Juan F Blanco; Froilán Granero-Moltó; Jorge María Núñez-Córdoba; Silvia López-Elío; Enrique Andreu; Fermín Sánchez-Guijo; José Dámaso Aquerreta; José María Bondía; Andrés Valentí-Azcárate; María Del Consuelo Del Cañizo; Eva María Villarón; Juan Ramón Valentí-Nin; Felipe Prósper Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Ana Ivanovska; Mengyu Wang; Tarlan Eslami Arshaghi; Georgina Shaw; Joel Alves; Andrew Byrne; Steven Butterworth; Russell Chandler; Laura Cuddy; James Dunne; Shane Guerin; Rob Harry; Aidan McAlindan; Ronan A Mullins; Frank Barry Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-06-10