Literature DB >> 32140862

Effectiveness and safety of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rajesh Krishnamoorthi1, Chandra S Dasari2, Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar2,3, Harshith Priyan4, Mahendran Jayaraj5, Joanna Law6, Michael Larsen6, Richard Kozarek6, Andrew Ross6, Shayan Irani6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) is emerging as an alternative technique for biliary drainage in patients who fail conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are being increasingly used for CDD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CDD using LAMS.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search of multiple databases through May 2019 to identify studies on CDD using covered self-expanding metal stents. Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrent jaundice associated with CDD using LAMS were estimated. A subgroup analysis was performed based on use of LAMS with electrocautery-enhanced delivery system (EC-LAMS).
RESULTS: Seven studies on CDD using LAMS (with 284 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 95.7% (95% CI 93.2-98.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 92.8-98.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.2% (95% CI 2.6-7.9). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 8.7% (95% CI 4.5-12.8). On subgroup analysis of CDD using EC-LAMS (5 studies with 201 patients), the pooled rates of technical and clinical success (per-protocol analysis) were 93.8% (95% CI 90.4-97.1) and 95.9% (95% CI 91.9-99.9), respectively. Pooled rate of post-procedure adverse events was 5.6% (95% CI 1.7-9.5). Pooled rate of recurrent jaundice was 11.3% (95% CI 6.9-15.7). Heterogeneity (I2) was low to moderate in the analyses.
CONCLUSION: CDD using LAMS/EC-LAMS is an effective and safe technique for biliary decompression in patients who failed ERCP. Further studies are needed to assess CDD using LAMS as primary treatment modality for biliary obstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; EC-LAMS- electro-cautery-enhanced LAMS; LAMS- lumen-apposing metal stents; Malignant biliary obstruction; Technical and clinical success

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32140862     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07484-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

Review 1.  When ERCP Fails: EUS-Guided Access to Biliary and Pancreatic Ducts.

Authors:  Abdelhai Abdelqader; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  A Wolf in LAMS Clothing: The Expansion of Off-Label Indications for Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.

Authors:  Chalapathi Rao Achanta; Sudhanva V Kinhal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 3.  Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better - endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound?

Authors:  Ji Young Bang; Robert Hawes; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.337

Review 4.  Relief of biliary obstruction: choosing between endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Andrew Canakis; Todd H Baron
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07

5.  Multicenter study of lumen-apposing metal stents with or without pigtail in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant obstruction-BAMPI TRIAL: an open-label, randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Albert Garcia-Sumalla; Carme Loras; Vicente Sanchiz; Rafael Pedraza Sanz; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Jose Ramon Aparicio; Carlos de la Serna-Higuera; Daniel Luna-Rodriguez; Xavier Andujar; María Capilla; Tatiana Barberá; Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina; Belen Martínez; Miguel Dura; Silvia Salord; Berta Laquente; Cristian Tebe; Sebastia Videla; Manuel Perez-Miranda; Joan B Gornals
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Comparison of Choledochoduodenostomy and Hepaticogastrostomy for EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiasu Li; Jian Tang; Feng Liu; Jun Fang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-10

7.  Comparison of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy and percutaneous drainage for distal biliary obstruction: A multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Tarek Sawas; Natashay J Bailey; Kit Ying Kitty Au Yeung; Theodore W James; Sumana Reddy; Chad J Fleming; Neil B Marya; Andrew C Storm; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Bret T Petersen; John A Martin; Michael J Levy; Todd H Baron; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Vinay Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.275

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.