Literature DB >> 32140786

Curve location influences spinal balance in coronal and sagittal planes but not transversal trunk motion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective observational study.

Sébastien Pesenti1,2,3, Vincent Pomero4, Solène Prost5,4,6, Mathieu Severyns5, Guillaume Authier4, Lionel Roscigni5,4,6, Elke Viehweger5,4,6, Benjamin Blondel5,4,6, Jean Luc Jouve5,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), spinal deformity can be seen in the thoracic or in the lumbar area. Although differences according to curve location are well described on standard radiographs, dynamic consequences of such difference remain unclear. Our objective was to explore the differences in dynamic spinal balance according to curve location in AIS patients using gait analysis
METHODS: We prospectively included 22 females with AIS planned for surgical correction (16.3 years old, 81% Risser ≥ 4). Patients were divided into two matched cohorts, according to major curve location [right thoracic (Lenke 1) or left lumbar (Lenke 5)]. Gait analysis was performed the day before surgery. Global balance was analyzed as the primary outcome. Local curves parameters (dynamic Cobb angles) were defined as the secondary outcome.
RESULTS: In coronal plane, Lenke 5 patients had a left trunk shift, whereas trunk was shifted to the right in Lenke 1 patients (- 20.7 vs 6.3, p = 0.001). In the sagittal plane, the main difference between the two groups was T12 position that remained over the pelvis during gait in Lenke 5 patients, whereas it was anterior to the pelvis in Lenke 1 patients. In the transversal plane, Lenke 5 and Lenke 1 patients presented the same gait abnormalities, with a global trunk rotation to the left (- 4.8 vs - 7.6, p = 0,165).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to provide the results of a direct comparison between Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 patients during gait. Curve location influenced coronal and sagittal balance, but abnormalities of transversal trunk motion were the same, wherever the curve was located. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Left lumbar; Right thoracic; Sagittal balance; Transversal plane; Trunk balance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32140786     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  4 in total

1.  Description of spine motion during gait in normal adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Solène Prost; Benjamin Blondel; Vincent Pomero; Guillaume Authier; Christophe Boulay; Jean Luc Jouve; Sebastien Pesenti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Early dynamic changes within the spine following posterior fusion using hybrid instrumentation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a gait analysis study.

Authors:  Sébastien Pesenti; Solene Prost; Vincent Pomero; Guillaume Authier; Matthieu Severyns; Lionel Roscigni; Christophe Boulay; Benjamin Blondel; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Comparison of Trunk Motion between Moderate AIS and Healthy Children.

Authors:  Lucas Struber; Vincent Nougier; Jacques Griffet; Olivier Daniel; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Philippe Cinquin; Aurélien Courvoisier
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Annemarijn Weber; Stephanie M D Huysmans; Sander M J van Kuijk; Silvia M A A Evers; Elisabeth M C Jutten; Rachel Senden; Aggie T G Paulus; Joop P W van den Bergh; Rob A de Bie; Johannes M R Merk; Sandrine P G Bours; Mark Hulsbosch; Esther R C Janssen; Inez Curfs; Wouter L W van Hemert; Martijn G M Schotanus; Paul de Baat; Niek C Schepel; Willem A den Boer; Johannes G E Hendriks; Wai-Yan Liu; Marinus de Kleuver; Martin H Pouw; Miranda L van Hooff; Eva Jacobs; Paul C P H Willems
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.