| Literature DB >> 32140758 |
Anna E Törnqvist1,2, Louise Grahnemo3, Karin H Nilsson3, Thomas Funck-Brentano3,4,5, Claes Ohlsson3, Sofia Movérare-Skrtic3.
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have shown that high bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis (OA), but the causality of this relationship remains unclear. Both bone mass and OA have been associated with the WNT signaling pathway in genetic studies, there is thus an interest in studying molecular partners of the WNT signaling pathway and OA. Female mice overexpressing WNT16 in osteoblasts (Obl-Wnt16 mice) have an increased bone mass. We aimed to evaluate if the high bone mass in Obl-Wnt16 mice leads to a more severe experimental OA development than in WT control mice. We induced experimental OA in female Obl-Wnt16 and WT control mice by destabilizing the medial meniscus (DMM). The Obl-Wnt16 mice displayed thicker medial and lateral subchondral bone plates as well as increased subchondral trabecular bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) but un-altered thickness of articular cartilage compared to WT mice. After DMM surgery, there was no difference in OA severity in the articular cartilage in the knee joint between the Obl-Wnt16 and WT mice. Both the Obl-Wnt16 and WT mice developed osteophytes in the DMM-operated tibia to a similar extent. We conclude that although the Obl-Wnt16 female mice have a high subchondral bone mass due to increased WNT signaling, they do not exhibit a more severe OA phenotype than their WT controls. This demonstrates that high bone mass does not result in an increased risk of OA per se.Entities:
Keywords: Cartilage; DMM; Mouse model; Osteoarthritis; WNT16
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32140758 PMCID: PMC7270053 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-020-00682-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Calcif Tissue Int ISSN: 0171-967X Impact factor: 4.333
Fig. 1Measurements of articular cartilage and subchondral bone in tibia. a Photos of the articular cartilage. The left photo shows two black lines between which the measurements were made (magnification × 10). The right photo (magnification × 20, black scale bar 100 µm) shows how the measurements of the un-calcified cartilage (black lines) and the total cartilage thickness (white lines) were made. b Image in the coronal plane of a right DMM-operated tibia from the µCT. The regions of interest are the medial subchondral bone plate (1), the lateral subchondral bone plate (2), the medial subchondral trabecular bone (3), the total subchondral trabecular bone (3 + 4), and the osteophyte (5)
Fig. 2The subchondral bone. A mixed-design two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess the effects of genotype (WT vs. Obl-Wnt16) and surgery (un-operated [Ctrl] vs. surgery destabilizing the medial meniscus [DMM]) on the subchondral bone. a The subchondral bone plate thickness in the medial and lateral tibia was affected by the genotype, where Obl-Wnt16 mice had thicker bone plates than the WT mice. The DMM surgery had an effect on the medial, but not the lateral, subchondral bone plate, where the surgery led to increased bone plate thickness. b The medial and total subchondral bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) was affected both by genotype and by surgery. The Obl-Wnt16 mice had higher BV/TV than WT mice and the surgery led to increased BV/TV. c The medial subchondral trabecular number (Tb.N) was affected both by genotype and by surgery, whereas the total subchondral Tb.N was only affected by genotype. The Obl-Wnt16 mice had a higher medial and total subchondral Tb.N than the WT mice and the DMM surgery led to a higher Tb.N on the medial side. d The medial and total subchondral trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) was decreased after DMM surgery, while the genotype had no effect. e Micro-CT reconstructions show subchondral bone, mainly in the tibia, of the left un-operated control knees (control) and the right knees that underwent DMM surgery. The arrows point at osteophytes. Data are shown as scatter plots where the bars show the mean (N = 15/group)
Osteophyte volume in the tibia of DMM-operated knees and thickness of medial articular cartilage in un-operated control knees from WT and Obl-Wnt16 mice
| WT | ||
|---|---|---|
| Osteophyte volume (mm3) | 0.059 ± 0.005 | 0.056 ± 0.005 |
| Total articular cartilage thk (μm) | 83.8 ± 2.0 | 83.9 ± 1.8 |
| Un-calcified articular cartilage thk (μm) | 39.0 ± 1.6 | 38.1 ± 1.9 |
| Calcified articular cartilage thk (μm) | 44.8 ± 2.4 | 45.7 ± 2.4 |
Data are presented as means ± SEM (osteophyte volume: N = 15, articular cartilage thickness: N = 14). There were no significant differences between the WT and Obl-Wnt16 mice in osteophyte volume or any measures of the articular cartilage thickness. The statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test
Thk thickness
Fig. 3OARSI scores for un-operated control knees and knees that underwent DMM surgery. A mixed-design two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess the effects of genotype (WT vs. Obl-Wnt16) and surgery (un-operated [Ctrl] vs. surgery destabilizing the medial meniscus [DMM]) on OARSI scores. a The summed OARSI scores for each compartment (medial = medial tibial plateau [MTP] + medial femoral condyle [MFC]; lateral = lateral tibial plateau [LTP] + lateral femoral condyle [LFC]), where the maximum score for each compartment is 12. The surgery but not the genotype affected the summed medial and lateral OARSI score. b The surgery but not the genotype affected the OARSI score in the MTP and in the MFC. The maximum score for each region is 6. c The surgery but not the genotype affected the OARSI score in the LFC. The maximum score for each region is 6. d Representative microphotographs of the MTP and MFC in un-operated control (Ctrl) and DMM-operated knees in Obl-Wnt16 and WT mice. Especially the MTP in the DMM-operated knees show severe cartilage damage both in the Obl-Wnt16 and WT mice. Data are shown as scatter plots where the bars show the mean (summed lateral compartment and LFC in Obl-Wnt16 mice N = 11; LTP in Obl-Wnt16 mice N = 14; summed lateral compartment and LFC in WT mice N = 13; all other parameters N = 15/group)