Ahmed Jorge1, Dylan A Royston2,3, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara1,2,4,5, Michael L Boninger1,2,5,6, Jennifer L Collinger1,2,3,6. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Veterans Affairs, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracortical microelectrode arrays have enabled people with tetraplegia to use a brain-computer interface for reaching and grasping. In order to restore dexterous movements, it will be necessary to control individual fingers. OBJECTIVE: To predict which finger a participant with hand paralysis was attempting to move using intracortical data recorded from the motor cortex. METHODS: A 31-yr-old man with a C5/6 ASIA B spinal cord injury was implanted with 2 88-channel microelectrode arrays in left motor cortex. Across 3 d, the participant observed a virtual hand flex in each finger while neural firing rates were recorded. A 6-class linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier, with 10 × 10-fold cross-validation, was used to predict which finger movement was being performed (flexion/extension of all 5 digits and adduction/abduction of the thumb). RESULTS: The mean overall classification accuracy was 67% (range: 65%-76%, chance: 17%), which occurred at an average of 560 ms (range: 420-780 ms) after movement onset. Individually, thumb flexion and thumb adduction were classified with the highest accuracies at 92% and 93%, respectively. The index, middle, ring, and little achieved an accuracy of 65%, 59%, 43%, and 56%, respectively, and, when incorrectly classified, were typically marked as an adjacent finger. The classification accuracies were reflected in a low-dimensional projection of the neural data into LDA space, where the thumb-related movements were most separable from the finger movements. CONCLUSION: Classification of intention to move individual fingers was accurately predicted by intracortical recordings from a human participant with the thumb being particularly independent.
BACKGROUND: Intracortical microelectrode arrays have enabled people with tetraplegia to use a brain-computer interface for reaching and grasping. In order to restore dexterous movements, it will be necessary to control individual fingers. OBJECTIVE: To predict which finger a participant with hand paralysis was attempting to move using intracortical data recorded from the motor cortex. METHODS: A 31-yr-old man with a C5/6 ASIA B spinal cord injury was implanted with 2 88-channel microelectrode arrays in left motor cortex. Across 3 d, the participant observed a virtual hand flex in each finger while neural firing rates were recorded. A 6-class linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier, with 10 × 10-fold cross-validation, was used to predict which finger movement was being performed (flexion/extension of all 5 digits and adduction/abduction of the thumb). RESULTS: The mean overall classification accuracy was 67% (range: 65%-76%, chance: 17%), which occurred at an average of 560 ms (range: 420-780 ms) after movement onset. Individually, thumb flexion and thumb adduction were classified with the highest accuracies at 92% and 93%, respectively. The index, middle, ring, and little achieved an accuracy of 65%, 59%, 43%, and 56%, respectively, and, when incorrectly classified, were typically marked as an adjacent finger. The classification accuracies were reflected in a low-dimensional projection of the neural data into LDA space, where the thumb-related movements were most separable from the finger movements. CONCLUSION: Classification of intention to move individual fingers was accurately predicted by intracortical recordings from a humanparticipant with the thumb being particularly independent.
Authors: Samuel R Nason; Matthew J Mender; Alex K Vaskov; Matthew S Willsey; Nishant Ganesh Kumar; Theodore A Kung; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-09-08 Impact factor: 18.688
Authors: Charles Guan; Tyson Aflalo; Carey Y Zhang; Elena Amoruso; Emily R Rosario; Nader Pouratian; Richard A Andersen Journal: Elife Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 8.713