Literature DB >> 32140658

Assessment of Rapid Hepatic Glycogen Synthesis in Humans Using Dynamic 13C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Stefan Stender1,2, Vlad G Zaha3,4, Craig R Malloy3,4, Jessica Sudderth5, Ralph J DeBerardinis5, Jae Mo Park3,6,7.   

Abstract

Carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) following oral intake of 13C-labeled glucose is the gold standard for imaging glycogen metabolism in humans. However, the temporal resolution of previous studies has been >13 minutes. Here, we describe a high-sensitivity 13C MRS method for imaging hepatic glycogen synthesis with a temporal resolution of 1 minute or less. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were acquired from the liver of 3 healthy volunteers, using a 13C clamshell radiofrequency transmit and paddle-shaped array receive coils in a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system. Following a 15-minute baseline 13C MRS scan of the liver, [1-13C]-glucose was ingested and 13C MRS data were acquired for an additional 1-3 hours. Dynamic change of the hepatic glycogen synthesis level was analyzed by reconstructing the acquired MRS data with temporal resolutions of 30 seconds to 15 minutes. Plasma levels of 13C-labeled glucose and lactate were measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. While not detected at baseline 13C MRS, [1-13C]-labeled α-glucose and β-glucose and glycogen peaks accumulated rapidly, beginning as early as ~2 minutes after oral administration of [1-13C]-glucose. The [1-13C]-glucose signals peaked at ~5 minutes, whereas [1-13C]-glycogen peaked at ~25 minutes after [1-13C]-glucose ingestion; both signals declined toward baseline levels over the next 1-3 hours. Plasma levels of 13C-glucose and 13C-lactate rose gradually, and approximately 20% of all plasma glucose and 5% of plasma lactate were 13C-labeled by 2 hours after ingestion.
Conclusion: We observed rapid accumulation of hepatic [1-13C]-glycogen following orally administered [1-13C]-glucose, using a dynamic 13C MRS method with a temporal resolution of 1 minute or less. Commercially available technology allows high temporal resolution studies of glycogen metabolism in the human liver.
© 2019 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32140658      PMCID: PMC7049683          DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Commun        ISSN: 2471-254X


two‐dimensional chemical shift imaging flip angle gas chromatography–mass spectrometry magnetic resonance imaging magnetic resonance spectroscopy radiofrequency signal to noise ratio Tesla time of repetition University of Texas Southwestern Hepatic glycogen is the main buffer for blood glucose levels. Following a meal, hepatocytes take up glucose from the portal vein and store it as glycogen, a branched polymer of glucose residues. Hepatic glycogen content varies 2‐fold during the day and can constitute up to 10% of the weight of the liver in humans. During periods of fasting and increased energy demands, hepatic glycogen can be broken down into glucose, which is released into the circulation to maintain blood glucose levels. Due to its key role in human glucose homeostasis, hepatic glycogen level is an important indicator of the altered hepatic metabolism in a range of metabolic disorders, including obesity, diabetes, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. For example, patients with type 2 diabetes have an impaired rate of glycogen synthesis following a meal, likely due to hepatic insulin resistance and/or an altered insulin to glucagon ratio.1 Patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes can develop glycogenic hepatopathy, a rare disorder characterized by the accumulation of large amounts of hepatic glycogen that ultimately can lead to fibrosis and cirrhosis of the liver.2 Genetic mutations in enzymes responsible for the synthesis or breakdown of glycogen cause glycogen storage diseases, a family of recessive disorders characterized by an abnormal quantity or quality of glycogen in the liver, muscles, heart, and kidney, depending on the specific molecular defect. Glycogen metabolism in human patients initially was explored using [3H]‐ and [14C]‐labeled tracers.3, 4 Because of the constraints of radiotracers for clinical research, the gold standard for studying in vivo hepatic glycogen metabolism in humans is 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) following oral intake of 13C‐labeled glucose. Hepatic glycogen metabolism has been extensively studied using this method in both physiologic and pathologic settings and following intake of various diets and/or drugs. Early studies conducted in the 1980s and 1990s determined the steady‐state kinetics of liver glycogen synthesis in fasting and fed healthy individuals.5, 6 Since then, hepatic glycogen metabolism has been studied by MRS in humans with a wide spectrum of traits or diseases, including obesity,7 type 2 diabetes,1 and glycogen storage disease.8 Due to limited sensitivity, however, these previous MRS‐based studies of glycogen metabolism relied on relatively low temporal resolutions, averaging signals of 13 minutes or longer1, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12; that is, the earliest time point of hepatic glycogen assessment was 13 minutes after oral intake.12 The hormonal and neuronal responses to oral food intake are nearly instant. For example, insulin is secreted from the pancreas and glucose is transported from the gut lumen across the enterocytes into the hepatic vein within minutes after glucose ingestion.11, 13 Measuring immediate changes in hepatic glycogen synthesis would therefore require a better temporal resolution than 13 minutes. A fine‐scale temporal resolution might provide new insights into the earliest postprandial phase of hepatic metabolism. Studying the kinetics of hepatic glycogen synthesis during the earliest postprandial period (0‐30 minutes) is technically challenging, in part due to the low signal to noise ratio (SNR), which typically requires longer acquisition times and averaging of the signal across many minutes. Alternative methods have been proposed to improve the sensitivity of detecting the glycogen signal. For instance, a novel method for detecting in vivo glycogen using water resonance in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recently developed and validated in a mouse model.14, 15 The method has been used in a proof of concept experiment in a recent human study at 3 Tesla (T), but further technological development is required for clinical usage.16 Major advances have been made in radiofrequency (RF) technology during the past decades. The SNR has been improved by novel coil designs and by exploiting new MRI techniques, such as parallel imaging.17 In particular, the recent translation of dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (or hyperpolarization) using 13C‐pyruvate accelerated the development of 13C RF coils optimized for imaging various human organs.18, 19, 20 In this study, we hypothesized that a state‐of‐the‐art 13C coil array design (volume carbon transmit coil, designed for hyperpolarized 13C studies) may improve SNR of in vivo 13C glycogen signals. We describe a highly sensitive 13C MRS method that makes it possible to use commercially available technology to observe hepatic glycogen synthesis during the earliest postprandial phase in humans.

Participants and Methods

Participants

We recruited 3 healthy volunteers (38‐51 years old, 2 men and 1 woman, all of white European descent). The study was approved by the ethical committee at the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center. All volunteers provided written consent after having received oral and written information about the study. The participants arrived at the imaging facility at 7 am after an overnight fast. Before the MRS session, weight and height were measured, blood samples were drawn, and an intravenous access was established.

MRS

We used a system designed for imaging hyperpolarized 13C MRS in human patients: a 3T wide‐bore clinical MR scanner (750w Discovery; GE Healthcare), a clamshell 13C transmit coil for RF excitation, and 8‐channel 13C receive array paddle‐shaped coils for signal reception (dimension of each channel element, 5 × 10 cm; GE Healthcare).19 Independent studies on a corn‐oil phantom (square bottle, 3.78 L) and a 13C‐labeled HCO3 – sphere phantom (1 M; diameter, 40 mm) were performed to determine the sensitivity profile of each coil element. For human studies, 1H images that include three‐plane fast gradient‐recalled echo and two‐dimensional (2D) fast imaging employing steady‐state acquisition (FIESTA) (16 slices; breath‐hold; echo‐time, 1.452 milliseconds; time of repetition [TR], 3.242 milliseconds) were acquired over the liver from each subject, using the GE body coil equipped in the scanner to acquire structural references and to optimize the position of the 13C paddle array coils. Following the 1H scans, a series of pulse‐and‐acquire 13C MRS scans were performed to monitor metabolism of thermally polarized (not hyperpolarized) [1‐13C]glucose. A baseline 13C MRS liver scan was first performed (TR, 0.5 seconds; flip angle [FA], 60‐degree angle; number of scans, 1,800; acquisition time, 15 minutes; spectral width, 10,000 Hz; number of spectral points, 4,096). The 13C MRS scan continued with oral administration of a [1‐13C]glucose solution (98 g glucose, containing 20% [1‐13C]glucose in 240 mL). Nonslice‐selective RF pulse (duration, 512 microseconds) was used for excitation, and the hepatic signal was localized by the paddle coil. 13C MRS scans started concurrently with glucose ingestion and were repeated in 15‐minute blocks for up to 3 hours. All free induction decay signals of individual scans were stored for reconstructing the spectra with various temporal resolutions. To confirm the spatial distribution of 13C signals, 13C chemical shift imaging (CSI) (field of view [FOV], 32 × 32 cm; matrix size, 8 × 8; TR, 0.5 seconds; eight averages; slice selective; FA, 60‐degree; acquisition time, 4 minutes 16 seconds; spectral width, 10,000 Hz; number of spectral points, 4,096) was performed in participant 2 after MRS scans.

Biochemical Measurements

Baseline blood samples were analyzed for plasma levels of lipids, lipoproteins, glucose, liver enzyme levels, and markers of kidney function, using standard clinical laboratory methods. Blood samples drawn every 15 minutes during the scan were analyzed for plasma levels of glucose and insulin (by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay at the Metabolic Phenotyping Core of the UTSW Medical Center) and for 13C‐enrichment of glucose and lactate, using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) at the Metabolomics Facility of the Children’s Medical Center Research Institute at the UTSW Medical Center. The GC‐MS analysis was performed on the upper phase of a Folch extraction, using 50 μL of plasma. Once dried, the sample was methoximated (10 mg/mL methoxyamine [226904; Sigma] in pyridine [270407; Sigma]) for 15 minutes at 70°C, then derivatized with N‐(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)‐N‐methyltrifluoroacetamide (394882; Sigma) for 1 hour at 70°C. We injected 1 μL of the sample on an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5975 mass selective detector. The detected abundances for the mass isotopomers corresponding to glucose (608‐614) and lactate (261‐264) were corrected for natural abundance.

Data Analysis

All the 13C data were processed using MATLAB (Mathworks; Natick, MA). For MRS, the raw data were apodized with a 5‐Hz Gaussian filter, zero filled by a factor of 4, and a fast Fourier transform (FFT) applied. The data were analyzed in several temporal resolutions (30 seconds to 15 minutes) by averaging every 60 to 1,800 measurements. After averaging the spectra over time, the zeroth‐ and first‐order phases were corrected in absorption mode. The resulting rolling baseline of the spectra was corrected by fitting to a spline function. Each metabolite was quantified by integrating the peak. For 13C CSI, additional 2D apodization using a hanning filter, 2D zero filling by a factor of 4, and 2D inverse FFT was performed along the spatial domain. 13C metabolite maps were created by integrating the corresponding peaks and overlaid on top of the 1H FIESTA images for display purposes. SNRs of glucose and glycogen were measured from each time‐averaged spectrum with 1‐minute and 15‐minute temporal resolutions by integrating the corresponding peaks. The SNRs are reported for nonoverlapping [1‐13C]glucose (93.3 ppm) and [1‐13C]glycogen (102.2 ppm) peaks only. All data are presented as mean ± SD.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of the 3 volunteers are shown in Table 1. We included 2 men and 1 woman, aged 38, 51, and 46 years, respectively. No volunteer had obesity or diabetes, and all had normal plasma levels of lipids and liver enzymes.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of the 3 Participants

Participant Number123
Age (years)513846
Sex (F/M)MMF
Body mass index (kg/m2)282223
Glucose (mg/dL)928574
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)305186157
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)356061
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)25210381
Triglycerides (mg/dL)9011381
ALT (U/L)223011

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; F, female; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein, LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; M, male.

Baseline Characteristics of the 3 Participants Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; F, female; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein, LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; M, male.

Signal Sensitivity of Paddle Array Coils

A sensitivity profile of the 8‐channel 13C paddle coils, using a bottle container of corn oil and a sphere phantom of 1‐M [13C], is demonstrated in Fig. 1. Signal sensitivity of each channel decreased markedly with increasing distance to the phantoms. In particular, the sphere phantom signal measured by channel #5‐8 was 10%‐15% of that measured from channel #2, the channel closest to the phantom. The RF coils were, however, sensitive enough to detect 13C signals located approximately 20 cm away from each coil element.
Figure 1

Sensitivity profile of the RF coils measured using a bottle container of corn oil (1.1% natural abundance of 13C) and a ball phantom of 13C‐labeled 1‐M HCO3 −. (A) 1H MRI showing the positioning of the phantoms relative to the transmit clamshell and 8‐channel receive paddle‐shaped phased‐array 13C RF coils. (B) Coil‐wise reconstructed total 13C maps acquired using a free‐induction decay chemical shift imaging sequence with a nonselective 90‐degree angle RF pulse. (C) Spatially averaged coil‐wise magnitude spectra. Abbreviations: ch, channel; RX, receive; TX, transmit.

Sensitivity profile of the RF coils measured using a bottle container of corn oil (1.1% natural abundance of 13C) and a ball phantom of 13C‐labeled 1‐M HCO3 −. (A) 1H MRI showing the positioning of the phantoms relative to the transmit clamshell and 8‐channel receive paddle‐shaped phased‐array 13C RF coils. (B) Coil‐wise reconstructed total 13C maps acquired using a free‐induction decay chemical shift imaging sequence with a nonselective 90‐degree angle RF pulse. (C) Spatially averaged coil‐wise magnitude spectra. Abbreviations: ch, channel; RX, receive; TX, transmit.

MRS of Hepatic Glycogen Synthesis After Oral Intake of [1‐13C]‐Labeled Glucose

While not detected at baseline 13C MRS, [1‐13C]‐labeled α‐glucose and β‐glucose (93.3 and 97.2 ppm, respectively) and glycogen (98.5 and 102.2 ppm) peaks accumulated rapidly, beginning as early as ~2 minutes after oral administration of [1‐13C]glucose (Fig. 2). Overall, the dynamic patterns of labeled glucose and glycogen were similar in the 3 participants. When reconstructed with 1‐minute temporal resolution, the [1‐13C]glucose signals peaked at 5.3 ± 1.5 minutes, whereas [1‐13C]glycogen peaked at 23.7 ± 1.2 minutes after [1‐13C]glucose ingestion, and both signals declined toward baseline levels over the rest of the MRS session. With 15‐minute temporal resolution, however, the glucose and glycogen peaks were at 15 and 30 minutes, respectively. Maximum signal intensity varied somewhat between the 3 participants, likely reflecting differences in body composition and/or coil placements relative to the liver. The peak SNRs of glucose and glycogen were 76.4 ± 25.6 and 105.1 ± 49.7, respectively, with temporal resolution of 15 minutes, and 26.4 ± 25.6 and 30.3 ± 9.8, respectively, with temporal resolution of 1 minute. Depending on the subject, the data could be reconstructed with a finer temporal resolution (<1 minute). Clear 13Cglucose and 13Cglycogen signals from each spectrum when reconstructed every 30 seconds are shown, for example, in Fig. 2 (Supporting Fig. S1).
Figure 2

Real‐time hepatic glycogen synthesis of a representative subject (participant 1), measured by dynamic 13C MRS followed by oral administration of [1‐13C]‐glucose. (A) Axial 1H MRI showing the position of 13C paddle receive‐array coils relative to the liver. Scale = 32 cm by 32 cm. (B) The first 15‐minute averaged spectrum following glucose administration and (C) 30‐second averaged spectra at 0‐, 2‐, 10‐, and 15‐minute time frames showed that glucose and glycogen started to build up rapidly. [1‐13C]‐labeled glycogen (98.5 and 102.2 ppm) as well as α‐glucose (93.3 ppm) and β‐glucose (97.2 ppm) could be resolved in each spectrum. Kinetics of [1‐13C] α‐glucose and β‐glucose and [1‐13C] glycogen in temporal resolutions of (D) 15 minutes and (E) 30 seconds. Abbreviation: a.u., arbitrary unit.

Real‐time hepatic glycogen synthesis of a representative subject (participant 1), measured by dynamic 13C MRS followed by oral administration of [1‐13C]glucose. (A) Axial 1H MRI showing the position of 13C paddle receive‐array coils relative to the liver. Scale = 32 cm by 32 cm. (B) The first 15‐minute averaged spectrum following glucose administration and (C) 30‐second averaged spectra at 0‐, 2‐, 10‐, and 15‐minute time frames showed that glucose and glycogen started to build up rapidly. [1‐13C]‐labeled glycogen (98.5 and 102.2 ppm) as well as α‐glucose (93.3 ppm) and β‐glucose (97.2 ppm) could be resolved in each spectrum. Kinetics of [1‐13C] α‐glucose and β‐glucose and [1‐13C] glycogen in temporal resolutions of (D) 15 minutes and (E) 30 seconds. Abbreviation: a.u., arbitrary unit.

Spatial Localization of [1‐13C]‐Glycogen Peaks to the liver

Although the spatial resolution was limited, separate 13C CSI data confirmed the spatial localization of [1‐13C]glycogen peaks in the liver (Fig. 3). In contrast, [1‐13C]glucose signals were primarily localized in the stomach area. The SNR of [1‐13C]glucose and [1‐13C]glycogen varied among the 3 participants, likely due to the different positioning of the paddle coils relative to the liver. However, glycogen peaks could be resolved even when reconstructed from 30‐second‐long segments (60 averages; Supporting Fig. S2).
Figure 3

Spatial distribution of 13C signal after oral administration of [1‐13C]‐glucose (participant 2). (A) Axial 1H MRI image that shows relative positions of the 13C paddle receive array coils and the slice prescription for 13C CSI. Fiducial markers indicate the location of each channel of the paddle coils. (B) Spatial distribution of the 13C metabolites at 90‐110 ppm. The metabolite maps are overlaid over the 1H MRI. [1‐13C]‐glucose and [1‐13C]‐glycogen signals are mainly detected from where stomach (black arrow) and liver (white arrows) are located. Signals from the stomach area were dominant in channels #1‐4 (B, left), whereas channels #5‐8 (B, right) primarily detected signals from the liver. All images scale = 32 cm by 32 cm. Abbreviation: ch, channel.

Spatial distribution of 13C signal after oral administration of [1‐13C]glucose (participant 2). (A) Axial 1H MRI image that shows relative positions of the 13C paddle receive array coils and the slice prescription for 13C CSI. Fiducial markers indicate the location of each channel of the paddle coils. (B) Spatial distribution of the 13C metabolites at 90‐110 ppm. The metabolite maps are overlaid over the 1H MRI. [1‐13C]glucose and [1‐13C]glycogen signals are mainly detected from where stomach (black arrow) and liver (white arrows) are located. Signals from the stomach area were dominant in channels #1‐4 (B, left), whereas channels #5‐8 (B, right) primarily detected signals from the liver. All images scale = 32 cm by 32 cm. Abbreviation: ch, channel.

Plasma Levels of Glucose, Lactate, and Insulin

Following oral ingestion of 98 g glucose (20% [1‐13C]‐labeled glucose), the fractional 13C enrichment of glucose and lactate rose gradually in the plasma. At 2 hours after ingestion, approximately 20% of all plasma glucose and 5% of plasma lactate were 13C labeled (data from participant 1 are shown in Fig. 4, top panels). Plasma levels of glucose and insulin rose in the 3 participants, reaching peaks at approximately 60 and 90 minutes after intake, respectively, and decreased toward baseline after 60 to 90 minutes (Fig. 4, bottom panels).
Figure 4

Temporal trends of plasma 13C‐glucose and 13C‐lactate and overall plasma levels of glucose and insulin after oral ingestion of [1‐13C]‐glucose in participant 1. Time of [1‐13C]‐glucose intake was set as 0. Abbreviation: m, mass.

Temporal trends of plasma 13C‐glucose and 13Clactate and overall plasma levels of glucose and insulin after oral ingestion of [1‐13C]glucose in participant 1. Time of [1‐13C]glucose intake was set as 0. Abbreviation: m, mass.

Discussion

In this study, we used 13C MRS to observe rapid accumulation of hepatic [1‐13C]glycogen following orally administered [1‐13C]glucose in 3 healthy adults aged 38 to 51 years. In all 3 participants, hepatic glycogen synthesis was detected by 13C MRS as early as 2 minutes after ingestion of labeled glucose. Hepatic glycogen synthesis increased rapidly and peaked at approximately 20 minutes after ingestion. The method uses commercially available technology that may be applied for clinical use. The improved sensitivity of the presented technology to the 13C‐labeled glycogen signal allows in vivo assessment of dynamic glycogen synthesis every 30 seconds or longer, potentially allowing noninvasive assays and kinetic analysis of the enzymes associated with glycogen metabolism. Many drugs and hormones, such as glucagon and epinephrine, stimulate glycogenolysis with a timeframe of a few seconds. For instance, glucagon stimulates glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis to raise plasma glucose, but the specific contribution of glycogenolysis versus gluconeogenesis is difficult to determine. Methods that measure glycogen on a minute to minute basis or even faster would allow exploration of such early response mechanisms. Early studies have validated the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques for measurement of 13C metabolic fluxes in animal model systems.21 The first study that reported natural abundance liver glycogen content in humans used a single 10‐cm 13C‐only coil and a 2.1T NMR spectrometer.22 The method was then further refined with the addition of a coplanar 1H‐decoupler.12 The 1H/13C concentric surface coil 11/8 cm configuration reached a time resolution of ~13 minutes and has been used since then in several studies.1, 5, 10, 23 In addition to measuring [1‐13C]glucose and [1‐13C]glycogen in the liver using 13C MRS, we used GC‐MS to measure 13Cglucose and 13Clactate in the circulatory system. These plasma measurements provide complementary information on the uptake and metabolism of the ingested bolus of [1‐13C]glucose. Following oral ingestion of 13C‐labeled glucose, plasma 13C‐glucose would be expected to stem from the following sources: (1) ingested [1‐13C]glucose that is not taken up by the liver and passes directly into circulation after uptake from the intestine, (2) 13Cglucose released from newly synthesized hepatic glycogen (i.e., [1‐13C]glucose that has been taken up by the liver, converted to glycogen, which subsequently undergoes glycogenolysis), and (3) from hepatic gluconeogenesis that used 13C‐labeled substrates (e.g., amino acids or lactate) stemming from metabolites of the ingested [1‐13C]glucose bolus. Plasma 13C‐lactate would be expected to derive from 13Cglucose taken up and metabolized in red blood cells and muscle cells. We observed that at 2 hours after ingestion, approximately 20% of all plasma glucose and 5% of plasma lactate was 13C labeled. The difference in glucose kinetics between 13C MRS and plasma GC‐MS suggests a prompt and effective hepatic uptake of [1‐13C]glucose from the portal vein circulation during the early postprandial period (<30 minutes). Previous studies in animals and humans have estimated the net hepatic glucose uptake following ingestion of an oral glucose load to be between 25% and 40%, depending on the amount of glucose and insulin reaching the liver.24 Although our study was not designed to assess the metabolic flux of the labeled glucose in detail, it is interesting to note that 13Cglucose and 13Cglycogen accumulated rapidly in the liver at 2 minutes after ingestion, whereas 13C‐labeled glucose first appeared in plasma 30 minutes after ingestion. This suggests that the hepatic uptake of orally ingested glucose is close to 100% in the early postprandial phase and that glucose only passes directly into circulation once the hepatic capacity for metabolizing or storing glucose is surpassed. Thus, the presented method may be used to clarify the percentage of glucose passing directly to the circulatory system postprandially. We also found that hepatic 13Cglycogen decreased after approximately 30 minutes, whereas the fractional enrichment of 13Cglucose in plasma increased from 30 minutes and throughout the remaining scan period. A possible explanation for this pattern is that the participants had been fasting for >12 hours at baseline and were likely relying on glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis to maintain euglycemia. It is possible that the decreased 13Cglycogen after 30 minutes reflects glycogenolysis of newly synthesized glycogen. We speculate that the last glucose residues incorporated (i.e., those derived from the labeled glucose load) are the first to be released during glycogenolysis. Studies in myofibroblasts support such a “last‐in first‐out” model of glycogenolysis.25 It is possible that the pattern would be different in recently fed individuals. We hypothesize that the decrease in 13Cglycogen after 30 minutes would be blunted (or absent) in recently fed individuals after ingestion of labeled glucose compared to the fasting subjects included in our study. It should be noted that the 13C spectra shown here can be further refined by proton decoupling, which was not available in the MR scanner that we used. For example, the SNR of [1‐13C]glycogen peak can be significantly improved by decoupling the 1H nuclei.12, 26 Moreover, a recent study showed that hepatic mitochondrial oxidative and anaplerotic fluxes can be measured from infused [1‐13C]‐acetate by measuring [5‐13C]‐ and [1‐13C]‐glutamate, using 1H‐decoupled 13C MRS.27 Exploiting 1H decoupling, however, requires caution as it increases substantial RF power deposition, which might easily exceed the specific absorption rate limit. Our study has limitations that should be further investigated. First, we only studied 3 healthy middle‐aged adults of white descent and without obesity. The results may therefore not necessarily be generalizable to subjects with different characteristics. For instance, coil placement relative to the liver appeared to majorly influence the sensitivity of the method. It is likely that sensitivity to detect glycogen will be lower in individuals with obesity in whom abdominal fat may hinder placement of the coil in proximity to the liver. Moreover, as the clamshell–paddle coil configuration samples 13C signals from a larger region than coplanar surface coils, the measured spectra likely contain signals from tissue regions other than the liver. In particular, muscle can convert glucose to glycogen under the experimental conditions. However, as the contribution of intracellular and vascular glucose in the liver is minimal, the 13C peaks detected in the liver by the CSI image is primarily glycogen in the liver (Fig. 3, white arrows). Another limitation is that we did not measure absolute levels of hepatic glycogen in our participants. This would have required the inclusion of phantoms with known glycogen concentrations during the scan. We suggest that future studies using the method should include glycogen phantoms, given that the absolute glycogen content of the liver is a biologically as well as clinically relevant measurement. In conclusion, we observed rapid accumulation of hepatic [1‐13C]glycogen following orally administered [1‐13C]glucose, using a sensitive, high‐resolution, time‐resolved 13C MRS method. This method, which is based on commercially available and clinically used technology, may be useful for future studies of hepatic glycogen metabolism in humans. Click here for additional data file.
  27 in total

1.  Contribution of net hepatic glycogen synthesis to disposal of an oral glucose load in humans.

Authors:  K F Petersen; G W Cline; D P Gerard; I Magnusson; D L Rothman; G I Shulman
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.694

2.  Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MR Technique for Liver Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: an Evaluation of Different Offset Number and an After-Meal and Over-Night-Fast Comparison.

Authors:  Min Deng; Shu-Zhong Chen; Jing Yuan; Queenie Chan; Jinyuan Zhou; Yì-Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Quantitative comparison of pathways of hepatic glycogen repletion in fed and fasted humans.

Authors:  G I Shulman; G Cline; W C Schumann; V Chandramouli; K Kumaran; B R Landau
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-09

4.  Analysis of glycogen storage disease by in vivo 13C NMR: comparison of normal volunteers with a patient.

Authors:  N Beckmann; J Seelig; H Wick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Increased rate of gluconeogenesis in type II diabetes mellitus. A 13C nuclear magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  I Magnusson; D L Rothman; L D Katz; R G Shulman; G I Shulman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Direct assessment of liver glycogen storage by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and regulation of glucose homeostasis after a mixed meal in normal subjects.

Authors:  R Taylor; I Magnusson; D L Rothman; G W Cline; A Caumo; C Cobelli; G I Shulman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  MRI detection of glycogen in vivo by using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (glycoCEST).

Authors:  Peter C M van Zijl; Craig K Jones; Jimin Ren; Craig R Malloy; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence for increased liver glycogen in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus after a 3-day fast.

Authors:  J N Clore; E P Post; D J Bailey; J E Nestler; W G Blackard
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  The effect of acute exercise on glycogen synthesis rate in obese subjects studied by 13C MRS.

Authors:  Marinette van der Graaf; Jacco H de Haan; Paul Smits; Alexandra H Mulder; Arend Heerschap; Cees J Tack
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Noninvasive measurements of glycogen in perfused mouse livers using chemical exchange saturation transfer NMR and comparison to (13)C NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Corin O Miller; Jin Cao; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Bruce M Damon; Alan D Cherrington; John C Gore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  2 in total

1.  Magnetization Transfer Ratio in Lower Limbs of Late Onset Pompe Patients Correlates With Intramuscular Fat Fraction and Muscle Function Tests.

Authors:  Claudia Nuñez-Peralta; Paula Montesinos; Alicia Alonso-Jiménez; Jorge Alonso-Pérez; David Reyes-Leiva; Javier Sánchez-González; Jaume Llauger-Roselló; Sonia Segovia; Izaskun Belmonte; Irene Pedrosa; Antonio Martínez-Noguera; Briano Matellini-Mosca; Glenn Walter; Jordi Díaz-Manera
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Lactate in contemporary biology: a phoenix risen.

Authors:  George A Brooks; Jose A Arevalo; Adam D Osmond; Robert G Leija; Casey C Curl; Ashley P Tovar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.228

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.