Literature DB >> 32140346

Mild Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Toshiaki Matsui1, Naoko Okano1, Hidemasa Kawamura1, Takahiro Oike2, Tatsuya Ohno1.   

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm. Although surgical resection is the first-line treatment for primary MCCs, the characteristics of this disease (i.e., high prevalence in the elderly and in the head and neck region) generate a considerable number of inoperable cases. Radiation therapy shows potential as a definitive treatment alternative to surgery. In definitive radiation therapy for non-resected MCC, 60-66 Gy administered in 2 Gy per fraction and five fractions per week is recommended. However, such frequent visits to the hospital can be a great burden to elderly patients and family members. In this report, we present the case of an 89-year-old patient with MCC (cT2N0M0, stage IIA) of the left cheek. The patient was treated with radiation therapy using a mild hypofractionated schedule (57 Gy provided in 3 Gy per fraction and three fractions per week) targeting the gross tumor. The treatment led to complete tumor remission with well-tolerated acute toxicities at three months post-irradiation. This case indicates that a mild hypofractionated irradiation schedule may achieve tumor control in MCC patients who are inoperable and who cannot make frequent hospital visits.
Copyright © 2020, Matsui et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case report; elderly; hypofractionation; merkel cell carcinoma; radiation therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32140346      PMCID: PMC7045982          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm [1,2]. Surgery (i.e., wide excision) is the standard treatment for primary MCCs [1]. However, MCC is prevalent among the elderly population, in which general anesthesia and surgery carry a high risk [3]. In addition, MCC frequently arises in the head and neck region, where wide excision without functional and cosmetic sequelae is difficult [3]. For these subsets of patients, radiation therapy shows potential as a definitive treatment alternative to surgery because MCCs are highly radiosensitive [4]. A literature review shows that in-field control rates and five-year overall survival rates for MCC treated with definitive radiation therapy are 75%-85% and 40%-60%, respectively [3]. In definitive radiation therapy for non-resected MCC, a common schedule is 60-66 Gy administered in 30-33 fractions and five fractions per week [1]. However, this requires frequent visits to the hospital, which can be a great burden to elderly patients. Here, we report a case of primary MCC of the head and neck region treated with radiation therapy using a mild hypofractionated schedule consisting of 57 Gy administered in 3 Gy per fraction and three fractions per week targeting the gross tumor. The treatment led to complete remission (CR) with well-tolerated acute toxicities. These results support the use of mild hypofractionated radiation therapy schedules for tumor control in elderly and inoperable MCC patients.

Case presentation

An 89-year-old Japanese woman diagnosed with primary MCC of the left cheek was referred to the department of radiation oncology from the department of dermatology for definitive irradiation in April, 2019. Her performance status was 1 assessed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group definition. She had a history of hypertension and valvular disease. In January, 2019, the patient noticed a papule on the left cheek. The lesion was diagnosed as a bacterial infection by the dermatologist. Despite treatment with antibiotics, the lesion showed rapid growth and formed a red dome-like tumor measuring 36 mm in diameter in March, 2019. Immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsied specimen showed positivity for CK20 (with a paranuclear dot-like pattern), chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD56, and cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and negativity for S-100 and HMB-45. Computed tomography (CT) examination showed a spherical tumor mass in the left cheek (Figure 1A) and no lesions indicative of metastases in the regions from the head through the pelvis. The patient was diagnosed with MCC, cT2N0M0, stage IIA [5].
Figure 1

Computed tomography images of Merkel cell carcinoma. (A) Before initiation of radiation therapy. An arrow shows the tumor (36 mm in diameter) (B) In the middle of radiation therapy (i.e., at 36 Gy in 12 fractions). (C) Three months after initiation of radiation therapy.

The patient received radiation therapy with a total dose of 57 Gy administered in 19 fractions (three fractions per week: on Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday). Electrons (12 MeV) were delivered to the gross tumor with a margin of 2-3 cm (Figure 2A) using a 5-mm-thick tissue-equivalent bolus without thermoplastic mask. The energy of the electron beams was kept the same throughout the course with an intention to cover the tumor bed according to tumor shrinkage. The tumor showed rapid remission, and CT images taken at 36 Gy showed near-CR of the tumor (Figure 1B). The tumor became invisible from the skin surface upon completion of radiation therapy (Figure 2B). The treatment was well tolerated; the patient experienced grade 1 dermatitis, grade 1 cheilitis, and grade 1 hyperpigmentation (based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects, version 5.0). No oral mucositis and dysgeusia were observed. At three months after the initiation of radiation therapy, the tumor showed CR (Figure 1C), and the skin surface remained intact (i.e., without defect or ulceration) with mild pigmentation (Figure 2C). CT examinations showed no lymph node or distant metastases were observed in the regions from the head through the pelvis.
Figure 2

Appearance of the Merkel cell carcinoma. (A) Before initiation of radiation therapy. An arrow shows the tumor and a black circle shows the irradiation field targeting the gross tumor with a margin of 2–3 cm. (B) On the day of completion of radiation therapy. (C) Three months after initiation of radiation therapy.

After one month, the patient developed two lymph node metastases in the left neck (one in level IA and another in level IB regions). The metastatic nodes and elective nodal regions (i.e., level IA, IB, II, III, IVA, V, VIA, and a part of VII) were treated with additional irradiation (60 Gy and 54 Gy in 30 fractions, respectively) using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The treatment led to clinical CR of the irradiated lesion with no evidence of metastasis for another three months. Follow-up by CT every three months up to three years, and every six months thereafter is scheduled to carefully monitor for regional and distant metastases [1].

Discussion

Here, we present a case of a patient with MCC who selected radiation therapy as an alternative to surgical resection due to advanced age and prevention of cosmetic sequelae. Because frequent hospital visits are a burden for patients and family members, we used a mild hypofractionated schedule (3 Gy per fraction, three fractions per week). In the conventional schedule of five weekly fractions for definitive radiation therapy for non-resected MCC, 60-66 Gy is administered in 30-33 fractions, showing a BED10 (biologically equivalent dose with the a/b ratio of 10) of 72.0-79.2 Gy [1]. Therefore, the total dose was set at 57 Gy in 19 fractions to ensure that the BED10 fell within this range, i.e., 74.1 Gy. As a result, the patient achieved complete tumor remission at least three months post-irradiation with no severe acute toxicities. Data on late toxicities are lacking in this case because of the short follow-up period; however, a meta-analysis of hypofractionated irradiation for skin cancer indicates that the BED3 of 114 Gy calculated for the present case results in good- and fair-cosmetic outcomes in approximately 70% and 15% of patients, respectively, with a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 12-77 months) [6]. Taken together, these data indicate the possibility that the mild hypofractionated schedule is feasible for radiation therapy in patients with primary non-resected MCC. Further investigation is needed to validate the present results because there is little data on the effects of radiation therapy for this rare disease. In addition, the proposed schedule is not feasible for non-MCC malignancies of the head and neck region, in which treatment often fails because of accelerated tumor cell repopulation during long overall treatment times [7]. Prophylactic irradiation for clinically node-negative cases remains controversial because the treatment (i) increases the risk for lymphedema and (ii) can be performed at a later time point as salvage treatment for locoregional recurrence [1,8,9]. In the present case, prophylactic irradiation to the nodal basin was not performed as initial treatment for these reasons after obtaining consent from the patient. In addition, sentinel lymph node biopsy was not performed based on patient's rejection. Although the patient experienced lymph node metastasis in the neck, the disease was salvaged by additional irradiation.

Conclusions

We present a case of primary MCC of the head and neck treated with definitive radiation therapy using a mild hypofractionated schedule consisting of 57 Gy administered in 3 Gy per fraction and three fractions per week. The treatment led to complete tumor remission with well-tolerated acute toxicities at three months post-irradiation.
  8 in total

1.  Hypofractionated radiation therapy for basal and squamous cell skin cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Charles T Lee; Eddie Zhang; Scott W Keith; Thomas J Galloway
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Primary Radiation Therapy for Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yolanda D Tseng; Upendra Parvathaneni
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Definitive radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma confers clinically meaningful in-field locoregional control: A review and analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Dakshika A Gunaratne; Julie R Howle; Michael J Veness
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in Merkel cell carcinoma: The Mayo Clinic experience of 150 patients.

Authors:  John R Sims; Travis E Grotz; Barbara A Pockaj; Richard W Joseph; Robert L Foote; Clark C Otley; Amy L Weaver; James W Jakub; Daniel L Price
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 5.  Effect of radiotherapy delay in overall treatment time on local control and survival in head and neck cancer: Review of the literature.

Authors:  José A González Ferreira; Javier Jaén Olasolo; Ignacio Azinovic; Branislav Jeremic
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-07-04

6.  Radiation sensitivity of Merkel cell carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  J H Leonard; J R Ramsay; J H Kearsley; G W Birrell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-07-30       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Sumaira Z Aasi; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Rachel Blitzblau; Glen M Bowen; Carlo M Contreras; Gregory A Daniels; Roy Decker; Jeffrey M Farma; Kris Fisher; Brian Gastman; Karthik Ghosh; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Manisha Loss; Daniel D Lydiatt; Jane Messina; Kishwer S Nehal; Paul Nghiem; Igor Puzanov; Chrysalyne D Schmults; Ashok R Shaha; Valencia Thomas; Yaohui G Xu; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Anita M Engh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 12.693

Review 8.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Therapeutic Update and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  Alessia Villani; Gabriella Fabbrocini; Claudia Costa; Maria Carmela Annunziata; Massimiliano Scalvenzi
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2019-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.