| Literature DB >> 32140183 |
Joanna Bauer1, Md Nazmul Hoq2,3, John Mulcahy2, Syed A M Tofail2, Fahmida Gulshan4, Christophe Silien2, Halina Podbielska1, Md Mostofa Akbar3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cellulite is a common physiological condition of dermis, epidermis, and subcutaneous tissues experienced by 85 to 98% of the post-pubertal females in developed countries. Infrared (IR) thermography combined with artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated image processing can detect both early and advanced cellulite stages and open up the possibility of reliable diagnosis. Although the cellulite lesions may have various levels of severity, the quality of life of every woman, both in the physical and emotional sphere, is always an individual concern and therefore requires patient-oriented approach.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cellulite; Infrared thermography; Prediction and health monitoring; Predictive preventive personalized medicine
Year: 2020 PMID: 32140183 PMCID: PMC7028894 DOI: 10.1007/s13167-020-00199-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EPMA J ISSN: 1878-5077 Impact factor: 6.543
Fig. 1Thermographic images of healthy skin and subsequent stages of cellulite diagnosed by means of the Nürnberger-Müller scale. (a) Stage 0—cellulite-free skin. (b) Stage 1—mild cellulite. (c) Stage 2—moderate cellulite. (d) Stage 3—severe cellulite
Nürnberger and Müller scale for classification of cellulite severity
| Cellulite stage | Clinical characteristics |
|---|---|
| 0 | Healthy skin, no skin surface alterations |
| 1 | Mild cellulite, the skin surface is smooth while the person is standing or lying. The alterations appear after pinching |
| 2 | Moderate cellulite, the so-called orange peel or mattress appearance is evident without pinching when standing |
| 3 | Severe cellulite, skin alterations are evident in both, standing and lying position |
Distribution of training and testing dataset from thermographic images among different stages of cellulite
| Stage | Number of images in the database | Number of training data | Number of test data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 0 (healthy) | 27 | 19 | 8 |
| Stage 1 (mild) | 93 | 65 | 28 |
| Stage 2 (moderate) | 61 | 43 | 18 |
| Stage 3 (severe) | 31 | 22 | 9 |
| Total | 212 | 149 | 63 |
Fig. 2The visual and thermographic images of healthy volunteer (a) and volunteer with severe cellulite (b)
Fig. 3Automatic cellulite classification protocol for IR thermographic images of cellulite
Fig. 4Combination of feature extraction methods and classification algorithms applied. For each of 9 applied feature extraction methods, all the classification algorithms were used to observe the differences in the performance. Similarly, for one classification algorithm, all the 9 feature extraction methods were tested to observe the differences in performance of feature extraction methods
Fig. 5Architecture of ANN used for cellulite stage classification. The ANN is a three-layer perceptron. The information is sent in one direction, from the input nodes, through the hidden nodes, to the output nodes. Gradient descent algorithm is used for back propagation
Fig. 6Automatic extraction of region of interest (ROI) area during image preprocessing. (a) Original thermographic image. (b) Preprocessed image of posterior site of thigh region
Summary of test data results for combination of ANN with HOG
| Stage | Total test data | Sensitivity (TPR) | Miss rate (FNR) | Specificity (TNR) | Precision (PPV) | Fall out (FPR) | AUC | Class accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 0 (healthy) | 8 | 0.125 | 0.875 | 0.963 | 0.333 | 0.036 | 0.181 | 0.656 | 0.857 |
| Stage 1 (mild) | 28 | 0.892 | 0.108 | 0.657 | 0.675 | 0.342 | 0.769 | 0.810 | 0.761 |
| Stage 2 (moderate) | 18 | 0.555 | 0.445 | 0.8 | 0.526 | 0.2 | 0.540 | 0.762 | 0.730 |
| Stage 3 (severe) | 9 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 0.981 | 0.75 | 0.018 | 0.461 | 0.866 | 0.888 |
| Average | 63 | 0.47669 | 0.5233 | 0.85057 | 0.57133 | 0.14943 | 0.48828 | 0.77406 | 0.80952 |
Fig. 7Receiver operating characteristics for the system combining ANN with HOG for all stages of cellulite severity. Blue line shows results for patients with mild cellulite (stage 1). Red line shows results for patients with moderate cellulite (stage 2). Yellow line shows results for patients with severe cellulite (stage 3). Purple line shows results for patients without cellulite (stage 0)
The diagnostic accuracy of the cellulite severity stage classification based on morphological attributes of thermographic images reported in the literature
| Author/year | Preprocessing/feature extraction | Classification algorithm | Total data in dataset (train/test) | Accuracy/result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present study | Automatic/HOG | ANN | 212 (149/63) | 80.95% |
| Mazurkiewicz et al. 2018 [ | Automatic/growing bubble algorithm | ANN | 140 (126/14) | 74% |
| Bauer et al. 2018 [ | Manual/using ImageJ software | Manual classification | 118 (59/59) | 97.96% |
| Wilczyński et al. 2017 [ | Manual/gray-level co-occurrence matrix | No classification of cellulite stages | 40 | Measure cellulite treatment effectiveness |
| Nkengneet et al. 2013 [ | Manual/manually selected feature | No classification of cellulite stages | 39 | Influence of environmental and body-related factors measured |