Literature DB >> 32139907

Interplay between whole-genome doubling and the accumulation of deleterious alterations in cancer evolution.

Saioa López1,2, Emilia L Lim2,3, Stuart Horswell4, Kerstin Haase5, Ariana Huebner1,2,3, Michelle Dietzen1,2,3, Thanos P Mourikis1,2, Thomas B K Watkins3, Andrew Rowan3, Sally M Dewhurst6, Nicolai J Birkbak3,7, Gareth A Wilson3, Peter Van Loo5,8, Mariam Jamal-Hanjani2,9, Charles Swanton10,11, Nicholas McGranahan12,13.   

Abstract

Whole-genome doubling (WGD) is a prevalent event in cancer, involving a doubling of the entire chromosome complement. However, despite its prevalence and prognostic relevance, the evolutionary selection pressures for WGD in cancer have not been investigated. Here, we combine evolutionary simulations with an analysis of cancer sequencing data to explore WGD during cancer evolution. Simulations suggest that WGD can be selected to mitigate the irreversible, ratchet-like, accumulation of deleterious somatic alterations, provided that they occur at a sufficiently high rate. Consistent with this, we observe an enrichment for WGD in tumor types with extensive loss of heterozygosity, including lung squamous cell carcinoma and triple-negative breast cancers, and we find evidence for negative selection against homozygous loss of essential genes before, but not after, WGD. Finally, we demonstrate that loss of heterozygosity and temporal dissection of mutations can be exploited to identify novel tumor suppressor genes and to obtain a deeper characterization of known cancer genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139907      PMCID: PMC7116784          DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0584-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  44 in total

Review 1.  From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer.

Authors:  Zuzana Storchova; David Pellman
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of Y chromosomes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Asexual Amoebae Escape Muller's Ratchet through Polyploidy.

Authors:  Sutherland K Maciver
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2016-09-03

5.  Muller's ratchet decreases fitness of a DNA-based microbe.

Authors:  D I Andersson; D Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration.

Authors:  Travis I Zack; Stephen E Schumacher; Scott L Carter; Andre D Cherniack; Gordon Saksena; Barbara Tabak; Michael S Lawrence; Cheng-Zhong Zhsng; Jeremiah Wala; Craig H Mermel; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey B Gabriel; Bryan Hernandez; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson; Rameen Beroukhim
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Tolerance of whole-genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution.

Authors:  Sally M Dewhurst; Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; Andrew J Rowan; Eva Grönroos; David Endesfelder; Tejal Joshi; Dmitri Mouradov; Peter Gibbs; Robyn L Ward; Nicholas J Hawkins; Zoltan Szallasi; Oliver M Sieber; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Quantifying the threat of extinction from Muller's ratchet in the diploid Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa).

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Dunja K Lamatsch
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  On the potential for extinction by Muller's ratchet in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Asher D Cutter
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers.

Authors:  Craig M Bielski; Ahmet Zehir; Alexander V Penson; Mark T A Donoghue; Walid Chatila; Joshua Armenia; Matthew T Chang; Alison M Schram; Philip Jonsson; Chaitanya Bandlamudi; Pedram Razavi; Gopa Iyer; Mark E Robson; Zsofia K Stadler; Nikolaus Schultz; Jose Baselga; David B Solit; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; Barry S Taylor
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and non-genetic clonal diversity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  James R M Black; Nicholas McGranahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Weighing up effects of extra chromosomes.

Authors:  Sarah Seton-Rogers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Mutation-selection balance and compensatory mechanisms in tumour evolution.

Authors:  Erez Persi; Yuri I Wolf; David Horn; Eytan Ruppin; Francesca Demichelis; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Liquid biopsy enters the clinic - implementation issues and future challenges.

Authors:  Michail Ignatiadis; George W Sledge; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Integrating Mathematical Modeling with High-Throughput Imaging Explains How Polyploid Populations Behave in Nutrient-Sparse Environments.

Authors:  Gregory J Kimmel; Mark Dane; Laura M Heiser; Philipp M Altrock; Noemi Andor
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Use of signals of positive and negative selection to distinguish cancer genes and passenger genes.

Authors:  László Bányai; Maria Trexler; Krisztina Kerekes; Orsolya Csuka; László Patthy
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Genomic evolutionary trajectory of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Arthur Krause; Luca Roma; Thomas Lorber; Tanja Dietsche; Valeria Perrina; David C Müller; Didier Lardinois; Christian Ruiz; Spasenija Savic Prince; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Charlotte K Y Ng; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04

8.  The Underlying Tumor Genomics of Predominant Histologic Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raul Caso; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Kay See Tan; Brooke Mastrogiacomo; Jian Zhou; Gregory D Jones; Bastien Nguyen; Nikolaus Schultz; James G Connolly; Whitney S Brandt; Matthew J Bott; Gaetano Rocco; Daniela Molena; James M Isbell; Yuan Liu; Marty W Mayo; Prasad S Adusumilli; William D Travis; David R Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Clonal fitness inferred from time-series modelling of single-cell cancer genomes.

Authors:  Sohrab Salehi; Farhia Kabeer; Nicholas Ceglia; Mirela Andronescu; Marc J Williams; Kieran R Campbell; Tehmina Masud; Beixi Wang; Justina Biele; Jazmine Brimhall; David Gee; Hakwoo Lee; Jerome Ting; Allen W Zhang; Hoa Tran; Ciara O'Flanagan; Fatemeh Dorri; Nicole Rusk; Teresa Ruiz de Algara; So Ra Lee; Brian Yu Chieh Cheng; Peter Eirew; Takako Kono; Jenifer Pham; Diljot Grewal; Daniel Lai; Richard Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Marco A Marra; Andrew McPherson; Alexandre Bouchard-Côté; Samuel Aparicio; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genetic and molecular subtype heterogeneity in newly diagnosed early- and advanced-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Deborah F DeLair; Lorenzo Ferrando; Daniel J Fix; Robert A Soslow; Kay J Park; Sarah Chiang; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ahmet Zehir; Mark T A Donoghue; Michelle Wu; David N Brown; Rajmohan Murali; Claire F Friedman; Dmitriy Zamarin; Vicky Makker; Jennifer J Mueller; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Carol Aghajanian; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.