Literature DB >> 32139511

Spatially remote motifs cooperatively affect substrate preference of a ruminal GH26-type endo-β-1,4-mannanase.

Fernanda Mandelli1, Mariana Abrahão Bueno de Morais1, Evandro Antonio de Lima1, Leane Oliveira2, Gabriela Felix Persinoti1, Mário Tyago Murakami3.   

Abstract

β-Mannanases from the glycoside hydrolase 26 (GH26) family are retaining hydrolases that are active on complex heteromannans and whose genes are abundant in rumen metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. These enzymes can exhibit distinct modes of substrate recognition and are often fused to carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs), resulting in a molecular puzzle of mechanisms governing substrate preference and mode of action that has not yet been pieced together. In this study, we recovered a novel GH26 enzyme with a CBM35 module linked to its N terminus (CrMan26) from a cattle rumen metatranscriptome. CrMan26 exhibited a preference for galactomannan as substrate and the crystal structure of the full-length protein at 1.85 Å resolution revealed a unique orientation of the ancillary domain relative to the catalytic interface, strategically positioning a surface aromatic cluster of the ancillary domain as an extension of the substrate-binding cleft, contributing to galactomannan preference. Moreover, systematic investigation of nonconserved residues in the catalytic interface unveiled that residues Tyr195 (-3 subsite) and Trp234 (-5 subsite) from distal negative subsites have a key role in galactomannan preference. These results indicate a novel and complex mechanism for substrate recognition involving spatially remote motifs, distal negative subsites from the catalytic domain, and a surface-associated aromatic cluster from the ancillary domain. These findings expand our molecular understanding of the mechanisms of substrate binding and recognition in the GH26 family and shed light on how some CBMs and their respective orientation can contribute to substrate preference.
© 2020 Mandelli et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; enzyme mechanism; glycobiology; glycoside hydrolase; substrate specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139511      PMCID: PMC7152760          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  32 in total

1.  Restoring low resolution structure of biological macromolecules from solution scattering using simulated annealing.

Authors:  D I Svergun
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen.

Authors:  Matthias Hess; Alexander Sczyrba; Rob Egan; Tae-Wan Kim; Harshal Chokhawala; Gary Schroth; Shujun Luo; Douglas S Clark; Feng Chen; Tao Zhang; Roderick I Mackie; Len A Pennacchio; Susannah G Tringe; Axel Visel; Tanja Woyke; Zhong Wang; Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Kazuharu Misawa; Kei-ichi Kuma; Takashi Miyata
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Weizhong Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments.

Authors:  Morgan N Price; Paramvir S Dehal; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  XDS.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kabsch
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-01-22

7.  Substrate-binding site of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase of the yeast Cryptococcus albidus.

Authors:  P Biely; Z Krátký; M Vrsanská
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1981-10

8.  The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019.

Authors:  Fábio Madeira; Young Mi Park; Joon Lee; Nicola Buso; Tamer Gur; Nandana Madhusoodanan; Prasad Basutkar; Adrian R N Tivey; Simon C Potter; Robert D Finn; Rodrigo Lopez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Reassembly and co-crystallization of a family 9 processive endoglucanase from its component parts: structural and functional significance of the intermodular linker.

Authors:  Svetlana Petkun; Inna Rozman Grinberg; Raphael Lamed; Sadanari Jindou; Tal Burstein; Oren Yaniv; Yuval Shoham; Linda J W Shimon; Edward A Bayer; Felix Frolow
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Boosting of enzymatic softwood saccharification by fungal GH5 and GH26 endomannanases.

Authors:  Pernille von Freiesleben; Nikolaj Spodsberg; Anne Stenbæk; Henrik Stålbrand; Kristian B R M Krogh; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  2 in total

1.  Unique active-site and subsite features in the arabinogalactan-degrading GH43 exo-β-1,3-galactanase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  Kaori Matsuyama; Naomi Kishine; Zui Fujimoto; Naoki Sunagawa; Toshihisa Kotake; Yoichi Tsumuraya; Masahiro Samejima; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Satoshi Kaneko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Gut microbiome of the largest living rodent harbors unprecedented enzymatic systems to degrade plant polysaccharides.

Authors:  Lucelia Cabral; Gabriela F Persinoti; Douglas A A Paixão; Marcele P Martins; Mariana A B Morais; Mariana Chinaglia; Mariane N Domingues; Mauricio L Sforca; Renan A S Pirolla; Wesley C Generoso; Clelton A Santos; Lucas F Maciel; Nicolas Terrapon; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; Mario T Murakami
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.