Camila Mendes Dos Passos1, Emanuella Gomes Maia2, Renata Bertazzi Levy3, Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins4, Rafael Moreira Claro5. 1. Department of Medicine and Nursing, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Nursing School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Electronic address: camilampassos@yahoo.com.br. 2. Nursing School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Department of Health Sciences, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of São Paulo Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Brazilian Institute for Consumer Defense (Idec), São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Nutrition, Nursing School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To estimate the relationship between the price of ultra-processed foods and prevalence of obesity in Brazil and examine whether the relationship differed according to socioeconomic status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the national Household Budget Survey from 2008/09 (n = 55 570 households, divided in 550 strata) were used. Weight and height of all individuals were used. Weight was measured by using portable electronic scales (maximum capacity of 150 kg). Height (or length) was measured using portable stadiometers (maximum capacity: 200 cm long) or infant anthropometers (maximum capacity: 105 cm long). Multivariate regression models (log-log) were used to estimate price elasticity. An inverse association was found between the price of ultra-processed foods (per kg) and the prevalence of overweight (Body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) in Brazil. The price elasticity for ultra-processed foods was -0.33 (95% CI: -0.46; -0.20) for overweight and -0.59 (95% CI: -0.83; -0.36) for obesity. This indicated that a 1.00% increase in the price of ultra-processed foods would lead to a decrease in the prevalence of overweight and obesity of 0.33% and 0.59%, respectively. For the lower income group, the price elasticity for price of ultra-processed foods was -0.34 (95% CI: -0.50; -0.18) for overweight and -0.63 (95% CI: -0.91; -0.36) for obesity. CONCLUSION: The price of ultra-processed foods was inversely associated with the prevalence of overweight and obesity in Brazil, mainly in the lowest socioeconomic status population. Therefore, the taxation of ultra-processed foods emerges as a prominent tool in the control of obesity.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To estimate the relationship between the price of ultra-processed foods and prevalence of obesity in Brazil and examine whether the relationship differed according to socioeconomic status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the national Household Budget Survey from 2008/09 (n = 55 570 households, divided in 550 strata) were used. Weight and height of all individuals were used. Weight was measured by using portable electronic scales (maximum capacity of 150 kg). Height (or length) was measured using portable stadiometers (maximum capacity: 200 cm long) or infant anthropometers (maximum capacity: 105 cm long). Multivariate regression models (log-log) were used to estimate price elasticity. An inverse association was found between the price of ultra-processed foods (per kg) and the prevalence of overweight (Body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) in Brazil. The price elasticity for ultra-processed foods was -0.33 (95% CI: -0.46; -0.20) for overweight and -0.59 (95% CI: -0.83; -0.36) for obesity. This indicated that a 1.00% increase in the price of ultra-processed foods would lead to a decrease in the prevalence of overweight and obesity of 0.33% and 0.59%, respectively. For the lower income group, the price elasticity for price of ultra-processed foods was -0.34 (95% CI: -0.50; -0.18) for overweight and -0.63 (95% CI: -0.91; -0.36) for obesity. CONCLUSION: The price of ultra-processed foods was inversely associated with the prevalence of overweight and obesity in Brazil, mainly in the lowest socioeconomic status population. Therefore, the taxation of ultra-processed foods emerges as a prominent tool in the control of obesity.
Authors: Toby Freeman; Hailay Abrha Gesesew; Clare Bambra; Elsa Regina Justo Giugliani; Jennie Popay; David Sanders; James Macinko; Connie Musolino; Fran Baum Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2020-11-10
Authors: Buthaina E Alathari; Nathália Teixeira Cruvinel; Nara Rubia da Silva; Mathurra Chandrabose; Julie A Lovegrove; Maria A Horst; Karani S Vimaleswaran Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Patricia Vasconcelos Leitão Moreira; Adélia da Costa Pereira de Arruda Neta; Flávia Emília Leite de Lima Ferreira; Jevuks Matheus de Araújo; Maria Laura da Costa Louzada; Rafaela Lira Formiga Cavalcanti de Lima; Rodrigo Pinheiro de Toledo Vianna; José Moreira da Silva Neto; Zoe Colombet; Martin O'Flaherty Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Luiz Felipe de Paiva Lourenção; Nara Cristina de Paula; Maria Angélica Cardoso; Paula Ribeiro Santos; Izabela Regina Cardoso de Oliveira; Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca; Glaucia Luciano da Veiga; Beatriz da Costa Aguiar Alves; Miriam Monteiro de Castro Graciano; Stela Márcia Pereira-Dourado Journal: J Pediatr (Rio J) Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 2.990