Literature DB >> 32139214

Impact of patient delay in a modern real world STEMI network.

Enrico Fabris1, Paola Arrigoni2, Luca Falco2, Giulia Barbati3, Davide Stolfo2, Alberto Peratoner4, Giancarlo Vitrella2, Serena Rakar2, Andrea Perkan2, Gianfranco Sinagra2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of patient delay on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), when system delay has performance that meets the current recommended guidelines, is poorly investigated.
METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and with an ECG STEMI diagnosis to wire crossing time (ETW) ≤120 min. Independent predictors of pre-discharge decreased LVEF (≤45%) were analyzed.
RESULTS: 490 STEMI patients with both ETW time ≤120 min and available pre-discharge LVEF were evaluated. Mean age was 64.2 ± 12 years, 76.2% were male, 19.5% were diabetics, 42.7% had and anterior myocardial infarction (MI), and 9.8% were in Killip class III-IV. Median time of patient's response to initial symptoms (patient delay) was 58,5 (IQR 30;157) minutes and median ETW time was 78 (IQR 62-95) minutes. 115 patients (23.4%) had pre-discharge LVEF ≤45%. At multivariable analysis independent predictors of decreased LVEF (≤45%) were anterior MI (OR 4,659, 95% CI 2,618-8,289, p < 0,001), Killip class (OR 1,449, 95% CI 1,090-1,928, p = 0,011) and patients delay above the median (OR 2,030, 95% CI 1,151-3.578, p = 0,014). These independent predictors were confirmed in patients with ETW time ≤90 min.
CONCLUSIONS: When system delay meets the recommended criteria for pPCI, patient delay becomes an independent predictor of pre-discharge LVEF. These findings provide further insights into the potential optimization of STEMI management and identify a target that needs to be improved, considering that still a significant proportion of patients continue to delay seeking medical care.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial infarction; Patient delay; Primary PCI; STEMI; System delay

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32139214     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  3 in total

1.  Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is appropriate in transient ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Lumir Koc; Monika Mikolaskova; Tomas Novotny; Jiri Parenica; Jan Kanovsky; Tomas Ondrus; Maria Holicka; Martin Poloczek; Jiri Jarkovsky; Marek Malik; Petr Kala
Journal:  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.245

2.  Effect of prehospital treatment in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Authors:  Enrico Fabris; Sara Menzio; Caterina Gregorio; Andrea Pezzato; Davide Stolfo; Aneta Aleksova; Giancarlo Vitrella; Serena Rakar; Andrea Perkan; Arnoud Wj Van't Hof; Gianfranco Sinagra
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.585

Review 3.  Pre-Hospital Antiplatelet Therapy for STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: What We Know and What Lies Ahead.

Authors:  Enrico Fabris; Serge Korjian; Barry S Coller; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Christopher B Granger; C Michael Gibson; Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.681

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.