| Literature DB >> 32138244 |
Heba M Abo-Salem1, Amr Nassrallah2, Ahmed A F Soliman3, Manal S Ebied1, Mohamed E Elawady4, Sayeda A Abdelhamid4, Eslam R El-Sawy1, Yazeed A Al-Sheikh5, Mourad A M Aboul-Soud5.
Abstract
The present work aims to design and synthesize novel series of spiro pyrazole-3,3'-oxindoles analogues and investigate their bioactivity as antioxidant and antimicrobial agents, as well as antiproliferative potency against selected human cancerous cell lines (i.e., breast, MCF-7; colon, HCT-116 and liver, HepG-2) relative to healthy noncancerous control skin fibroblast cells (BJ-1). The mechanism of their cytotoxic activity has been also examined by immunoassaying the levels of key anti- and proapoptotic protein markers. The analytical and spectral data of the all synthesized target congeners were compatible with their structures. Synthesized compounds showed diverse moderate to powerful antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Results of MTT assay revealed that seven synthesized compounds (i.e., 11a, 11b, 12a, 12b, 13b, 13c and 13h) particularly exhibited significant cytotoxicity against the three cancerous cell lines under investigation. Ranges of IC50 values obtained were 5.7-21.3 and 5.8-37.4 µg/mL against HCT-116 and MCF-7, respectively; which is 3.8 and 6.5-fold (based on the least IC50 values) more significant relative to the reference chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. In HepG-2 cells, the analogue 13h the highest cytotoxicity with IC50 value of 19.2µg/mL relative to doxorubicin (IC50 = 21.6µg/mL). The observed cytotoxicity was specific to cancerous cells, as evidenced by the minimal toxicity in the noncancerous control skin-fibroblast cells. ELISA results indicated that the observed antiproliferative effect against examined cancer cell lines is mediated via engaging the activation of apoptosis as illustrated by the significant increase in proapoptotic protein markers (p53, bax and caspase-3) and reduction in the antiapoptotic marker bcl-2. Taken together, results of the present study emphasize the potential of spiro pyrazole-oxindole analogues as valuable candidate anticancer agents against human cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: antiproliferative agents; apoptosis; isatin; spiro pyrazole-oxindoles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32138244 PMCID: PMC7179167 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25051124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Reagents and conditions: (i) alkyl halide, acetone, K2CO3, reflux; (ii) alkyl halide, DMSO, NaOH, stirring, r.t.; (iii) EtOH, diethylamine, stirring, r.t. 10–15 days (Method A); EtOH, diethylamine, reflux, ~ 5h (Method B); (iv) gl. AcOH, HCl (2 drops), 80 °C, 30 min; (v) N2H4.H2O (98%), EtOH, gl. AcOH (2 drops); (vi) N2H4.H2O (98%) or NH2NHPh, EtOH, gl.AcOH (2 drops), reflux and (vii) EtOH, KOH (33%), reflux.
Antimicrobial activity of the most active compounds (20 mg per disc).a.
| Compd. No b | Inhibition Zone (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-Positive | Gram-Negative | Yeast | Fungi | ||||
|
| - | 12 | 8 | - | 20 | 16 | - |
|
| - | 12 | 12 | - | 18 | 18 | - |
|
| - | 10 | 10 | - | 20 | 25 | - |
|
| 8 | 16 | 18 | - | 12 | 10 | - |
|
| 10 | 18 | 24 | - | 10 | 10 | 8 |
|
| 10 | 18 | 20 | - | 10 | 10 | - |
|
| - | - | - | - | 18 | 20 | - |
|
| 8 | 16 | 24 | - | 12 | - | 10 |
|
| 8 | 10 | - | - | 8 | - | - |
|
| 25.6 | 28.4 | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| - | - | 30.2 | 25.8 | - | - | - |
|
| - | - | - | - | 24.8 | 23.5 | 26.7 |
a disk diffusion method and b concentration 20 µg.
Scavenging activity % on DPPH radicals of the most active compounds at a concentration of 20µg/l.
| Compd. No | Scavenging Activity (%) a at Different Time (min) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | |
|
| 6.86 ± 1.17 | 10.26 ± 1.37 | 17.73 ± 1.28 | 26.87 ± 1.56 |
|
| 9.60 ± 1.77 | 14.28 ± 1.52 | 20.44 ± 1.65 | 30.76 ± 2.04 |
|
| 40.65 ± 1.28 | 40.65 ± 1.81 | 40.65 ± 1.67 | 40.65 ± 1.35 |
|
| 56.43 ± 1.08 | 67.09 ± 1.45 | 76.92 ± 1.51 | 81.41 ± 1.37 |
|
| 17.29 ± 1.53 | 23.46 ± 1.64 | 30.56 ± 1.49 | 40.65 ± 1.46 |
|
| 9.76 ± 1.76 | 10.24 ± 1.26 | 11.39 ± 1.53 | 13.97 ± 1.55 |
|
| 41.14 ±1.25 | 45.77 ± 1.36 | 56.55 ± 1.99 | 64.08 ± 2.01 |
|
| 43.52± 1.98 | 47.05 ± 1.81 | 56.33 ± 1.29 | 65.55 ± 1.55 |
|
| 13.97± 1.36 | 20.97 ± 1.26 | 23.96 ± 1.51 | 35.13 ± 1.61 |
|
| 19.32± 1.24 | 31.32 ± 1.81 | 25.92 ± 1.24 | 39.70 ± 1.99 |
|
| 9.10 ± 1.38 | 26.15 ± 1.26 | 36.70 ± 1.62 | 48.13 ± 1.82 |
|
| 17.90 ± 1.62 | 28.28 ± 1.61 | 34.28 ± 1.27 | 40.74 ± 1.54 |
|
| 25.95 ± 1.85 | 44.00 ± 1.46 | 49.25 ± 1.77 | 53.67 ± 1.81 |
|
| 15.22 ± 1.98 | 16.31 ± 1.96 | 20.58 ± 1.48 | 35.71 ± 1.91 |
|
| 45.88 ± 1.05 | 54.32 ± 1.08 | 60.60 ± 1.64 | 69.18 ± 1.65 |
|
| 41.09 ± 2.05 | 51.52 ± 1.91 | 53.98 ± 2.06 | 59.22 ± 2.14 |
|
| 42.36 ± 1.45 | 58.08 ± 1.28 | 60.27 ± 1.66 | 65.96 ± 1.64 |
|
| 14.85 ± 1.36 | 22.56 ± 1.79 | 26.29 ± 1.23 | 39.48 ± 1.61 |
|
| 39.91 ± 1.75 | 41.82 ± 1.49 | 44.96 ± 1.37 | 55.44 ± 1.33 |
|
| 17.89 ± 1.23 | 28.18 ± 1.27 | 30.87 ± 1.98 | 34.89 ± 1.72 |
|
| 9.05 ± 1.63 | 10.15 ± 1.83 | 16.19 ± 1.21 | 22.93 ± 1.62 |
|
| 8.39 ± 1.14 | 11.87 ± 1.23 | 14.08 ± 2.01 | 26.55 ± 2.13 |
|
| 57.93 ± 1.36 | 67.35 ± 1.35 | 72.00 ± 1.82 | 85.99 ± 2.17 |
|
| 39.91 ± 1.87 | 41.82 ± 1.09 | 44.96 ± 1.66 | 55.44 ± 1.55 |
|
| 9.36 ± 1.25 | 14.15 ± 1.61 | 20.39 ± 1.92 | 24.77 ± 2.05 |
|
| 23.60 ± 1.36 | 32.73 ± 1.13 | 39.23 ± 1.29 | 47.48 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 94.37 ± 1.74 | 97.45 ± 1.32 | 98.78 ± 0.94 | 99.67 ± 0.28 |
a Results are the mean of three independent experiments. Data = mean ± SD.
Antiproliferative activity of the newly synthesized compounds against human carcinoma cell lines and normal skin fibroblast cells (BJ-1) at 100 µg/ml.
| Compd. No. | Growth Inhibition (%) | Growth Inhibition (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT-116 | HepG-2 | MCF-7 | BJ-1 | Compd. No. | HCT-116 | HepG-2 | MCF-7 | BJ-1 | |
|
| 96.2 | - | 94.3 | 6.2 |
| 92.4 | 81.9 | 91.6 | 13.0 |
|
| 94.9 | - | 92.3 | 10.1 |
| 91.3 | 79.5 | 93.4 | 14.1 |
|
| 30.2 | - | 0 | 45.2 |
| 97.7 | 96.8 | 97.8 | 69.4 |
|
| 96.7 | - | 93.6 | 9.1 |
| 91.2 | - | 90.4 | 14.2 |
|
| 95.1 | - | 97.4 | 5.0 |
| 84.6 | - | 80.3 | 8.1 |
|
| 12.4 | - | 6.3 | 62.3 |
| 91.8 | - | 92.3 | 13.6 |
|
| 96.9 | 89.3 | 96.4 | 11.6 |
| 96.2 | - | 94 | 9.5 |
|
| 94.5 | 81.4 | 95.4 | 10.4 |
| 35.1 | - | 85.3 | 16.6 |
|
| 97.9 | 90.9 | 97.8 | 5.1 |
| 91.4 | - | 89.3 | 14.5 |
|
| 94.6 | 82.7 | 96.4 | 7.0 |
| 92.1 | - | 90.6 | 16.0 |
|
| 90.4 | 79.8 | 96.4 | 10.3 |
| 96.2 | - | 94 | 86.5 |
|
| 86.5 | 72.8 | 79.7 | 16.4 |
| 35.1 | - | 52.3 | 78.6 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 96.8 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 96.8 | 0 | |
Figure 2Cytotoxicity (%) dose-response curves of increasing concentrations for selected synthesized spiro pyrazole-oxindole congeners against cancerous cells. (A) Dose-response curve of 11a congener against HCT-116 as compared to BJ-1. (B) (A) Dose-response curve of 13h congener against MCF-7 as compared to BJ-1. IC50 values in µg/mL were calculated by probit analysis using an Excel-based macro.
IC50 values of spiro pyrazole-oxindole congeners against human cancer cell lines.
| Compd. No. | IC50ug/ml | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HCT-116 | HepG-2 | MCF-7 | |
|
| 5.7 | - | 21.1 |
|
| 16.4 | - | 19.4 |
|
| 5.8 | - | 20.2 |
|
| 7.9 | - | 16.7 |
|
| 31.3 | 60.6 | 32.4 |
|
| 21.3 | 48.0 | 24.0 |
|
| 14.7 | 27.0 | 24.1 |
|
| 26.9 | 60.9 | 25.4 |
|
| 35.4 | 67.1 | 31.9 |
|
| 28.4 | 83.6 | 32.1 |
|
| 35.3 | 72.2 | 43.0 |
|
| 20.5 | 19.2 | 5.8 |
|
| 36.2 | - | 32.3 |
|
| 40.1 | - | 36.3 |
|
| 40.5 | - | 32.5 |
|
| 30.7 | - | 31.6 |
|
| - | - | 54.0 |
|
| 35.8 | - | 31.2 |
|
| 38.0 | - | 37.4 |
|
| 26.1 | 21.6 | 37.6 |
All IC50 values were calculated for the timepoint 48 h post-treatment.
Effect of analogues 11a, 11b, 12a, 12b and 13c on cleaved caspase-3 levels, and expression levels of Bcl-2 and Bax in MCF-7 cancer cells treated with the compounds at their IC50 concentrations.
| Compounds | Caspase-3 Activity % | Bcl-2 (ng/50 mg Protein) | p53 (Pg/50 mg Protein) | Bax (pg/50 mg Protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10.2 ± 2.84 | 25.13 ± 3.45 | 4.18 ± 0.58 | 39.56 ± 4.56 |
|
| 16.67 ± 0.67 | 12.3 ± 2.26 | 14.45 ± 0.82 | 122.34 ± 3.45 |
|
| 16.19 ± 0.79 | 16.18 ± 0.78 | 5.85 ± 0.75 | 109.35 ± 4.05 |
|
| 14.18 ± 0.74 | 13.09 ± 2.27 | 13.31 ± 1.08 | 113.09 ± 1.98 |
|
| 47.25 ± 1.89 | 12.87 ± 1.84 | 29.58 ± 2.53 | 167.07 ± 4.83 |
|
| 39.07 ± 4.97 | 44.5 ± 4.56 | 7.34 ± 1.5 | 88.34 ± 3.79 |
Data = mean ± SD.
Effect of compounds 11a, 11b, 12a, 12b and 13c on active caspase-3 levels, and expression levels of Bcl-2 and Bax in HCT-116 cancer cells treated with the compounds at their IC50 concentrations.
| Compounds | Caspase-3 Activity % | Bcl-2 (ng/50 mg Protein) | p53 (pg/50 mg Protein) | Bax (pg/50 mg Protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13.60 ± 2.45 | 23.56 ± 3.56 | 1.68 ± 0.06 | 118.54 ± 0.83 |
|
| 19.12 ± 0.89 | 8.2 ± 1.26 | 16.2 ± 0.56 | 159.26 ± 0.96 |
|
| 14.04 ± 0.54 | 7.25 ± 1.45 | 3.25 ± 0.15 | 119.14 ± 1.65 |
|
| 17.43 ± 0.58 | 21.13 ± 1.45 | 23.11 ± 1.22 | 124.56 ± 0.95 |
|
| 33.12 ± 1.37 | 18.87 ± 1.84 | 48.07 ± 1.94 | 191.07 ± 1.95 |
|
| 47.32 ± 6.32 | 57.45 ± 6.45 | 2.34 ± 0.95 | 123.45 ±7.45 |
Data = mean ± SD.