| Literature DB >> 32138231 |
Xuefei Zhang1, Juncai Zhu1, Chaofan Wu2, Qingding Wu1, Kefei Liu1, Kang Jiang3.
Abstract
In order to explore the applicability of the rejuvenated asphalt with wood tar as the main raw material, the orthogonal test was used to determine the optimal ratio of wood tar-based rejuvenator. The physical properties, rheological properties and components of matrix asphalt, aged asphalt, wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt and commercial RA-102# rejuvenated asphalt were tested and compared. The results show that the optimal ratio of wood tar-based rejuvenator is 15wt% wood tar, 0.3wt% biomass fiber, 5wt% plasticizer, 0.3wt% compatibilizer, and 1wt% stabilizer of the mass of aged asphalt. Wood tar-based rejuvenator can restore the physical properties of the aged asphalt to meet the specification requirements. The synergistic effect of biomass fiber and plasticizer make the wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt has good resistance to accumulated permanent deformation, but its low-temperature cracking resistance needs to be further improved. During the rejuvenation process of aged asphalt, the colloidal state changes from gel-state to sol-state, characterizing that the viscosity of asphalt decreased and the fluidity increased. Wood tar-based rejuvenator can react with aged asphalt to weaken the vibration strength of carbonyl and sulfoxide groups, so as to realize the recovery of service performance. Wood tar-based rejuvenator has better environmental protection and applicability, which is worthy of further study and promotion.Entities:
Keywords: infrared spectroscopy; low-temperature performance; orthogonal test; rejuvenated asphalt; rejuvenator; wood tar
Year: 2020 PMID: 32138231 PMCID: PMC7084972 DOI: 10.3390/ma13051123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Basic properties of 70# matrix asphalt.
| Property | Unit | 70# Matrix Asphalt |
|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25 °C) | 0.1 mm | 64 |
| Penetration index | - | −0.124 |
| Softening point | °C | 48 |
| Ductility (15 °C) | cm | 117 |
| Viscosity (135 °C) | Pa·s | 0.34 |
Basic properties of bamboo.
| Category | Content (%) | Test Method | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical property | Moisture | 7.0 | Dry weightlessness method |
| Volatile matter | 90.9 | ||
| Fixed carbon | 0.2 | Slow ashing | |
| Ash | 1.9 | ||
| Elementary composition | C | 46.90 | Elemental analysis |
| H | 5.84 | ||
| N | 0.22 | ||
| S | 0.03 | ||
| Ob | 47.01 | ||
| Composition | Cellulose | 41.0 | Van Soest |
| Hemicellulose | 25.7 | ||
| Lignin | 26.1 | ||
Basic properties of RA-102# rejuvenator.
| Property | Measured Value | Specified Value |
|---|---|---|
| Viscosity (60 °C, Pa·s) | 5370 | 50–60000 |
| Flash point (°C) | 241 | ≥220 |
| Saturates content (%) | 20.3 | ≤30 |
| Aromatics content (%) | 64.2 | - |
| Viscosity ratio before and after TFOT | 1.3 | ≤3 |
| Mass change before and after TFOT (%) | 0.5 | −3~3 |
Figure 1Infrared spectrum of each raw material (a) 70# matrix asphalt; (b) wood tar; (c) RA-102# rejuvenator.
Figure 2Preparation process of wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt.
Figure 3Test scheme.
The wavenumber range and vibration form of each C=O group and its influence on asphalt.
| Type | Absorption Peak Location (cm−1) | Vibration Form | Effects on Asphalt Properties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carboxylic acid | 1700–1725 | Stretching vibration | Rutting resistance [ |
| Aldehyde | 1720–1740 | Stretching vibration, strong | Rutting resistance and fatigue property [ |
| Amide | 1640–1690 | Stretching vibration, strong | Improve adhesion [ |
| Anhydride | 1740–1775 and 1800–1830 | Stretching vibration, two bands | Improve adhesion [ |
| Ester | 1735–1750 | Stretching vibration, strong | Improve adhesion [ |
| Ketone | 1665–1715 | Stretching vibration, strong | Increase the viscosity [ |
Figure 4The positions of seven groups in the FTIR spectrum of aged asphalt.
Composition of wood tar-based rejuvenator and performance test results of its rejuvenated asphalt.
| Serial Number | Factors and Levels (%) | Test Index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood Tar | Biomass Fiber | Plasticizer | Penetration (25 °C, 0.1 mm) | Softening Point (°C) | Ductility (15 °C) | Viscosity (135 °C, Pa·s) | |
| S-1 | 5 | 0.3 | 2 | 43 | 65 | 60.0 | 0.52 |
| S-2 | 5 | 0.4 | 3 | 42 | 67 | 59.3 | 0.53 |
| S-3 | 5 | 0.5 | 4 | 46 | 68 | 64.2 | 0.55 |
| S-4 | 5 | 0.6 | 5 | 43 | 69 | 60.1 | 0.56 |
| S-5 | 10 | 0.3 | 3 | 60 | 54 | 90.1 | 0.51 |
| S-6 | 10 | 0.4 | 2 | 59 | 57 | 74.1 | 0.53 |
| S-7 | 10 | 0.5 | 5 | 62 | 58 | 85.7 | 0.54 |
| S-8 | 10 | 0.6 | 4 | 64 | 61 | 69.8 | 0.55 |
| S-9 | 15 | 0.3 | 4 | 73 | 49 | 114.0 | 0.40 |
| S-10 | 15 | 0.4 | 5 | 68 | 51 | 118.3 | 0.43 |
| S-11 | 15 | 0.5 | 2 | 59 | 54 | 108.4 | 0.47 |
| S-12 | 15 | 0.6 | 3 | 60 | 56 | 101.4 | 0.48 |
| S-13 | 20 | 0.3 | 5 | 78 | 46 | 121.2 | 0.34 |
| S-14 | 20 | 0.4 | 4 | 64 | 48 | 116.0 | 0.38 |
| S-15 | 20 | 0.5 | 3 | 61 | 54 | 107.3 | 0.39 |
| S-16 | 20 | 0.6 | 2 | 60 | 56 | 103.2 | 0.40 |
Figure 5Change rule of penetration of wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt under different factors and levels.
Figure 6Change rule of softening point of wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt under different factors and levels.
Figure 7Change rule of ductility of wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt under different factors and levels.
Figure 8Change rule of viscosity of wood tar-based rejuvenated asphalt under different factors and levels.
Physical performance test results of each asphalt.
| Property | AO | AP | AR1 | AR2 | Specification Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25 °C, 0.1 mm) | 64 | 20 | 64.5 | 63 | 60–80 |
| Softening point (°C) | 48 | 85.3 | 57 | 55 | ≥46 |
| Ductility (15 °C, cm) | 117 | 21 | 102 | 113 | ≥100 |
| Viscosity (135 °C, Pa·s) | 0.34 | 0.93 | 0.42 | 0.48 | - |
Figure 9Test results of high-temperature performance of asphalt binder (a) G* and δ; (b) G*/sinδ.
Figure 10Test results of low-temperature performance of each asphalt (a) S-value; (b) m-value.
Composition and gel index of each asphalt.
| Asphalt Type | Composition (%) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asphaltene | Colloid | Saturates | Aromatics | ||
| AO | 11.01 | 25.37 | 14.31 | 48.35 | 0.34 |
| AP | 16.30 | 31.28 | 14.25 | 38.14 | 0.44 |
| AR1 | 12.79 | 26.71 | 15.18 | 43.25 | 0.40 |
| AR2 | 12.40 | 24.37 | 14.30 | 44.87 | 0.39 |
Figure 11FTIR analysis result of each asphalt binder (a) Wavenumber 400–4000 cm−1; (b) Wavenumber 600–2000 cm−1.
Figure 12Change rule of aging coefficient of each group.