Literature DB >> 32134829

The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.

Takashi Fujishiro1, Masato Matsuura1, Yuri Fujino1, Hiroshi Murata1, Kana Tokumo2, Shunsuke Nakakura3, Yoshiaki Kiuchi2, Ryo Asaoka1.   

Abstract

PRECIS: Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) measurements were conducted in primary open-angle glaucoma and normative subjects. Many parameters were significantly correlated, however, the strengths were weak to moderate.
PURPOSE: Reichert ORA parameters are derived from pressure information following the application of air-jet, whereas detailed structural observation can be made using the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology instrument (CST). The purpose of the study was to investigate the association between CST measurements and ORA measured corneal hysteresis (CH).
METHODS: Measurements of CST, ORA, axial length, average corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure with Goldmann applanation tonometry were carried out in 104 eyes of 104 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 35 eyes from normative subjects. The association between CST and ORA parameters was assessed using linear regression analysis, with model selection based on the second order bias corrected Akaike Information Criterion index.
RESULTS: Deformation amplitude ratio (corneal softness, R=-0.51), SP A1 (corneal stiffness, R=0.41), and Inverse Radius (integrated area under the curve of the inverse concave radius, R=-0.44) were significantly correlated with CH (P <0.05). The optimal model to explain CH using CST measurements was given by: CH=-76.3+4.6×A1 time (applanation time in the corneal inward movement)+1.9×A2 time (second applanation time in the corneal outward movement) + 3.1 × highest concavity deformation amplitude (magnitude of movement of the corneal apex from before deformation to its highest concavity) + 0.016×CCT (R=0.67; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: CST parameters are significant, but weakly or moderately, related to ORA measured CH.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32134829     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

Review 1.  Corneal Hysteresis, Intraocular Pressure, and Progression of Glaucoma: Time for a "Hyst-Oric" Change in Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Patrick Murtagh; Colm O'Brien
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Determine Corneal Biomechanical Parameters by Finite Element Simulation and Parametric Analysis Based on ORA Measurements.

Authors:  Xiao Qin; Lei Tian; Hui Zhang; Di Zhang; Ying Jie; Hai-Xia Zhang; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-13

3.  Study on change in corneal biomechanics and effect of percent tissue altered in myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Murugesan Vanathi; Suresh Azimeera; Noopur Gupta; Radhika Tandon
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST.

Authors:  Nisa Silva; André Ferreira; Pedro Manuel Baptista; Ana Figueiredo; Rita Reis; Isabel Sampaio; João Beirão; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Pedro Menéres; Maria João Menéres
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-08

5.  Association of Corneal Biomechanics Properties with Myopia in a Child and a Parent Cohort: Hong Kong Children Eye Study.

Authors:  Shu-Min Tang; Xiu-Juan Zhang; Marco Yu; Yu-Meng Wang; Carol Y Cheung; Ka-Wai Kam; Alvin L Young; Li-Jia Chen; Clement C Tham; Chi-Pui Pang; Jason C Yam
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.