Ambarish Pandey1, Kershaw V Patel1, Judy L Bahnson2, Sarah A Gaussoin2, Corby K Martin3, Ashok Balasubramanyam4, Karen C Johnson5, Darren K McGuire1, Alain G Bertoni6, Dalane Kitzman7, Jarett D Berry1. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (A.P., K.V.P., D.K.M., J.D.B.). 2. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science (J.L.B., S.A.G.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. 3. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge (C.K.M.). 4. Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (A.B.). 5. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis (K.C.J.). 6. Division of Public Health Sciences (A.G.B.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. 7. Department of Internal Medicine (D.K.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a higher risk for heart failure (HF). The impact of a lifestyle intervention and changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body mass index on risk for HF is not well established. METHODS:Participants from the Look AHEAD trial (Action for Health in Diabetes) without prevalent HF were included. Time-to-event analyses were used to compare the risk of incident HF between the intensive lifestyle intervention and diabetes support and education groups. The associations of baseline measures of CRF estimated from a maximal treadmill test, body mass index, and longitudinal changes in these parameters with risk of HF were evaluated with multivariable adjusted Cox models. RESULTS: Among the 5109 trial participants, there was no significant difference in the risk of incident HF (n=257) between the intensive lifestyle intervention and the diabetes support and education groups (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.75-1.23]) over a median follow-up of 12.4 years. In the most adjusted Cox models, the risk of HF was 39% and 62% lower among moderate fit (tertile 2: hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.83]) and high fit (tertile 3: hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.24-0.59]) groups, respectively (referent group: low fit, tertile 1). Among HF subtypes, after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and interval incidence of myocardial infarction, baseline CRF was not significantly associated with risk of incident HF with reduced ejection fraction. In contrast, the risk of incident HF with preserved ejection fraction was 40% lower in the moderate fit group and 77% lower in the high fit group. Baseline body mass index also was not associated with risk of incident HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction, or HF with reduced ejection fraction after adjustment for CRF and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Among participants with repeat CRF assessments (n=3902), improvements in CRF and weight loss over a 4-year follow-up were significantly associated with lower risk of HF (hazard ratio per 10% increase in CRF, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.82-0.99]; per 10% decrease in body mass index, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94]). CONCLUSIONS: Among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Look AHEAD trial, the intensive lifestyle intervention did not appear to modify the risk of HF. Higher baseline CRF and sustained improvements in CRF and weight loss were associated with lower risk of HF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00017953.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a higher risk for heart failure (HF). The impact of a lifestyle intervention and changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body mass index on risk for HF is not well established. METHODS:Participants from the Look AHEAD trial (Action for Health in Diabetes) without prevalent HF were included. Time-to-event analyses were used to compare the risk of incident HF between the intensive lifestyle intervention and diabetes support and education groups. The associations of baseline measures of CRF estimated from a maximal treadmill test, body mass index, and longitudinal changes in these parameters with risk of HF were evaluated with multivariable adjusted Cox models. RESULTS: Among the 5109 trial participants, there was no significant difference in the risk of incident HF (n=257) between the intensive lifestyle intervention and the diabetes support and education groups (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.75-1.23]) over a median follow-up of 12.4 years. In the most adjusted Cox models, the risk of HF was 39% and 62% lower among moderate fit (tertile 2: hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.83]) and high fit (tertile 3: hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.24-0.59]) groups, respectively (referent group: low fit, tertile 1). Among HF subtypes, after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and interval incidence of myocardial infarction, baseline CRF was not significantly associated with risk of incident HF with reduced ejection fraction. In contrast, the risk of incident HF with preserved ejection fraction was 40% lower in the moderate fit group and 77% lower in the high fit group. Baseline body mass index also was not associated with risk of incident HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction, or HF with reduced ejection fraction after adjustment for CRF and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Among participants with repeat CRF assessments (n=3902), improvements in CRF and weight loss over a 4-year follow-up were significantly associated with lower risk of HF (hazard ratio per 10% increase in CRF, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.82-0.99]; per 10% decrease in body mass index, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94]). CONCLUSIONS: Among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Look AHEAD trial, the intensive lifestyle intervention did not appear to modify the risk of HF. Higher baseline CRF and sustained improvements in CRF and weight loss were associated with lower risk of HF. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00017953.
Entities:
Keywords:
body mass index; cardiorespiratory fitness; diabetes mellitus, type 2; heart failure; obesity; overweight; risk
Authors: Kershaw V Patel; Matthew W Segar; Carl J Lavie; Nitin Kondamudi; Ian J Neeland; Jaime P Almandoz; Corby K Martin; Salvatore Carbone; Javed Butler; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eduardo Thadeu de Oliveira Correia; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Letícia Mara Dos Santos Barbetta; Antonio José Lagoeiro Jorge; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Monika Gawałko; Thomas A Agbaedeng; Arnela Saljic; Dominik N Müller; Nicola Wilck; Renate Schnabel; John Penders; Michiel Rienstra; Isabelle van Gelder; Thomas Jespersen; Ulrich Schotten; Harry J G M Crijns; Jonathan M Kalman; Prashanthan Sanders; Stanley Nattel; Dobromir Dobrev; Dominik Linz Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 13.081
Authors: Andrew C Wills; Elsa Vazquez Arreola; Muideen T Olaiya; Jeffrey M Curtis; Margareta I Hellgren; Robert L Hanson; William C Knowler Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Kershaw V Patel; Judy L Bahnson; Sarah A Gaussoin; Karen C Johnson; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Ursula White; KayLoni L Olson; Alain G Bertoni; Dalane W Kitzman; Jarett D Berry; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ambarish Pandey; Sanjiv J Shah; Javed Butler; Dean L Kellogg; Gregory D Lewis; Daniel E Forman; Robert J Mentz; Barry A Borlaug; Marc A Simon; Julio A Chirinos; Roger A Fielding; Elena Volpi; Anthony J A Molina; Mark J Haykowsky; Flora Sam; Bret H Goodpaster; Alain G Bertoni; Jamie N Justice; James P White; Jingzhone Ding; Scott L Hummel; Nathan K LeBrasseur; George E Taffet; Iraklis I Pipinos; Dalane Kitzman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 27.203
Authors: Matthew W Segar; Kershaw V Patel; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Melissa C Caughey; Javed Butler; Gregg C Fonarow; Justin L Grodin; Darren K McGuire; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Neela D Thangada; Kershaw V Patel; Bradley Peden; Vijay Agusala; Julia Kozlitina; Sonia Garg; Mark H Drazner; Colby Ayers; Jarett D Berry; Ambarish Pandey Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 5.501