Connor J Liu1,2, Maximilian Schaettler1,2, Dylan T Blaha3, Jay A Bowman-Kirigin1,2, Dale K Kobayashi1,2, Alexandra J Livingstone4, Diane Bender5, Christopher A Miller6, David M Kranz3, Tanner M Johanns5,4,7, Gavin P Dunn2,7. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. 4. Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 6. The McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 7. The Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials testing immunotherapies in glioblastoma (GBM) have yielded mixed results, new strategies targeting tumor-specific somatic coding mutations, termed "neoantigens," represent promising therapeutic approaches. We characterized the microenvironment and neoantigen landscape of the aggressive CT2A GBM model in order to develop a platform to test combination checkpoint blockade and neoantigen vaccination. METHODS: Flow cytometric analysis was performed on intracranial CT2A and GL261 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Whole-exome DNA and RNA sequencing of the CT2A murine GBM was employed to identify expressed, somatic mutations. Predicted neoantigens were identified using the pVAC-seq software suite, and top-ranking candidates were screened for reactivity by interferon-gamma enzyme linked immunospot assays. Survival analysis was performed comparing neoantigen vaccination, anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (αPD-L1), or combination therapy. RESULTS: Compared with the GL261 model, CT2A exhibited immunologic features consistent with human GBM including reduced αPD-L1 sensitivity and hypofunctional TILs. Of the 29 CT2A neoantigens screened, we identified neoantigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in the intracranial TIL and draining lymph nodes to two H2-Kb restricted (Epb4H471L and Pomgnt1R497L) and one H2-Db restricted neoantigen (Plin2G332R). Survival analysis showed that therapeutic neoantigen vaccination with Epb4H471L, Pomgnt1R497L, and Plin2G332R, in combination with αPD-L1 treatment was superior to αPD-L1 alone. CONCLUSIONS: We identified endogenous neoantigen specific CD8+ T cells within an αPD-L1 resistant murine GBM and show that neoantigen vaccination significantly augments survival benefit in combination with αPD-L1 treatment. These observations provide important preclinical correlates for GBM immunotherapy trials and support further investigation into the effects of multimodal immunotherapeutic interventions on antiglioma immunity. KEY POINTS: 1. Neoantigen vaccines combined with checkpoint blockade may be promising treatments.2. CT2A tumors exhibit features of human GBM microenvironments.3. Differential scanning fluorimetry assays may complement in silico neoantigen prediction tools.
BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials testing immunotherapies in glioblastoma (GBM) have yielded mixed results, new strategies targeting tumor-specific somatic coding mutations, termed "neoantigens," represent promising therapeutic approaches. We characterized the microenvironment and neoantigen landscape of the aggressive CT2AGBM model in order to develop a platform to test combination checkpoint blockade and neoantigen vaccination. METHODS: Flow cytometric analysis was performed on intracranial CT2A and GL261 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Whole-exome DNA and RNA sequencing of the CT2AmurineGBM was employed to identify expressed, somatic mutations. Predicted neoantigens were identified using the pVAC-seq software suite, and top-ranking candidates were screened for reactivity by interferon-gamma enzyme linked immunospot assays. Survival analysis was performed comparing neoantigen vaccination, anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (αPD-L1), or combination therapy. RESULTS: Compared with the GL261 model, CT2A exhibited immunologic features consistent with humanGBM including reduced αPD-L1 sensitivity and hypofunctional TILs. Of the 29 CT2A neoantigens screened, we identified neoantigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in the intracranial TIL and draining lymph nodes to two H2-Kb restricted (Epb4H471L and Pomgnt1R497L) and one H2-Db restricted neoantigen (Plin2G332R). Survival analysis showed that therapeutic neoantigen vaccination with Epb4H471L, Pomgnt1R497L, and Plin2G332R, in combination with αPD-L1 treatment was superior to αPD-L1 alone. CONCLUSIONS: We identified endogenous neoantigen specific CD8+ T cells within an αPD-L1 resistant murineGBM and show that neoantigen vaccination significantly augments survival benefit in combination with αPD-L1 treatment. These observations provide important preclinical correlates for GBM immunotherapy trials and support further investigation into the effects of multimodal immunotherapeutic interventions on antiglioma immunity. KEY POINTS: 1. Neoantigen vaccines combined with checkpoint blockade may be promising treatments.2. CT2A tumors exhibit features of humanGBM microenvironments.3. Differential scanning fluorimetry assays may complement in silico neoantigen prediction tools.
Authors: Norbert Hilf; Sabrina Kuttruff-Coqui; Katrin Frenzel; Valesca Bukur; Stefan Stevanović; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Michael Platten; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Valerie Dutoit; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Per Thor Straten; Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Berta Ponsati; Hideho Okada; Ulrik Lassen; Arie Admon; Christian H Ottensmeier; Alexander Ulges; Sebastian Kreiter; Andreas von Deimling; Marco Skardelly; Denis Migliorini; Judith R Kroep; Manja Idorn; Jordi Rodon; Jordi Piró; Hans S Poulsen; Bracha Shraibman; Katy McCann; Regina Mendrzyk; Martin Löwer; Monika Stieglbauer; Cedrik M Britten; David Capper; Marij J P Welters; Juan Sahuquillo; Katharina Kiesel; Evelyna Derhovanessian; Elisa Rusch; Lukas Bunse; Colette Song; Sandra Heesch; Claudia Wagner; Alexandra Kemmer-Brück; Jörg Ludwig; John C Castle; Oliver Schoor; Arbel D Tadmor; Edward Green; Jens Fritsche; Miriam Meyer; Nina Pawlowski; Sonja Dorner; Franziska Hoffgaard; Bernhard Rössler; Dominik Maurer; Toni Weinschenk; Carsten Reinhardt; Christoph Huber; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Harpreet Singh-Jasuja; Ugur Sahin; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Wolfgang Wick Journal: Nature Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tanner M Johanns; Jeffrey P Ward; Christopher A Miller; Courtney Wilson; Dale K Kobayashi; Diane Bender; Yujie Fu; Anton Alexandrov; Elaine R Mardis; Maxim N Artyomov; Robert D Schreiber; Gavin P Dunn Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Chris Hunter; Raffaella Smith; Daniel P Cahill; Philip Stephens; Claire Stevens; Jon Teague; Chris Greenman; Sarah Edkins; Graham Bignell; Helen Davies; Sarah O'Meara; Adrian Parker; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Lisa Brackenbury; Gemma Buck; Adam Butler; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon Forbes; Matthew Gorton; Kristian Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jonathon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones; Vivienne Kosmidou; Ross Laman; Richard Lugg; Andrew Menzies; Janet Perry; Robert Petty; Keiran Raine; David Richardson; Rebecca Shepherd; Alexandra Small; Helen Solomon; Calli Tofts; Jennifer Varian; Sofie West; Sara Widaa; Andy Yates; Douglas F Easton; Gregory Riggins; Jennifer E Roy; Kymberly K Levine; Wolf Mueller; Tracy T Batchelor; David N Louis; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Richard Wooster Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eric Bouffet; Valérie Larouche; Brittany B Campbell; Daniele Merico; Richard de Borja; Melyssa Aronson; Carol Durno; Joerg Krueger; Vanja Cabric; Vijay Ramaswamy; Nataliya Zhukova; Gary Mason; Roula Farah; Samina Afzal; Michal Yalon; Gideon Rechavi; Vanan Magimairajan; Michael F Walsh; Shlomi Constantini; Rina Dvir; Ronit Elhasid; Alyssa Reddy; Michael Osborn; Michael Sullivan; Jordan Hansford; Andrew Dodgshun; Nancy Klauber-Demore; Lindsay Peterson; Sunil Patel; Scott Lindhorst; Jeffrey Atkinson; Zane Cohen; Rachel Laframboise; Peter Dirks; Michael Taylor; David Malkin; Steffen Albrecht; Roy W R Dudley; Nada Jabado; Cynthia E Hawkins; Adam Shlien; Uri Tabori Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Neil H Segal; D Williams Parsons; Karl S Peggs; Victor Velculescu; Ken W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; James P Allison Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hiroshi Nakashima; Quazim A Alayo; Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster; Gordon J Freeman; Vijay K Kuchroo; David A Reardon; Soledad Fernandez; Michael Caligiuri; E Antonio Chiocca Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Timothy F Cloughesy; Aaron Y Mochizuki; Joey R Orpilla; Willy Hugo; Alexander H Lee; Tom B Davidson; Anthony C Wang; Benjamin M Ellingson; Julie A Rytlewski; Catherine M Sanders; Eric S Kawaguchi; Lin Du; Gang Li; William H Yong; Sarah C Gaffey; Adam L Cohen; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Eudocia Q Lee; David A Reardon; Barbara J O'Brien; Nicholas A Butowski; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Jennifer L Clarke; Isabel C Arrillaga-Romany; Howard Colman; Thomas J Kaley; John F de Groot; Linda M Liau; Patrick Y Wen; Robert M Prins Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Amit S Adhikari; Juliete Macauley; Yoshimi Johnson; Mike Connolly; Timothy Coleman; Teri Heiland Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Mustafa Khasraw; Yoko Fujita; Catalina Lee-Chang; Irina V Balyasnikova; Hinda Najem; Amy B Heimberger Journal: Annu Rev Med Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 16.048
Authors: Adam M Swartz; Kendra L Congdon; Smita K Nair; Qi-Jing Li; James E Herndon; Carter M Suryadevara; Katherine A Riccione; Gary E Archer; Pamela K Norberg; Luis A Sanchez-Perez; John H Sampson Journal: NPJ Vaccines Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 7.344
Authors: Mona O Mohsen; Daniel E Speiser; Justine Michaux; HuiSong Pak; Brian J Stevenson; Monique Vogel; Varghese Philipose Inchakalody; Simone de Brot; Said Dermime; Georges Coukos; Michal Bassani-Sternberg; Martin F Bachmann Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Joel R Garbow; Tanner M Johanns; Xia Ge; John A Engelbach; Liya Yuan; Sonika Dahiya; Christina I Tsien; Feng Gao; Keith M Rich; Joseph J H Ackerman Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 6.244