Literature DB >> 32133509

KRGDB: the large-scale variant database of 1722 Koreans based on whole genome sequencing.

Kwang Su Jung1, Kyung-Won Hong1, Hyun Youn Jo1, Jongpill Choi1, Hyo-Jeong Ban2, Seong Beom Cho1, Myungguen Chung1.   

Abstract

Since 2012, the Center for Genome Science of the Korea National Institute of Health (KNIH) has been sequencing complete genomes of 1722 Korean individuals. As a result, more than 32 million variant sites have been identified, and a large proportion of the variant sites have been detected for the first time. In this article, we describe the Korean Reference Genome Database (KRGDB) and its genome browser. The current version of our database contains both single nucleotide and short insertion/deletion variants. The DNA samples were obtained from four different origins and sequenced in different sequencing depths (10× coverage of 63 individuals, 20× coverage of 194 individuals, combined 10× and 20× coverage of 135 individuals, 30× coverage of 230 individuals and 30× coverage of 1100 individuals). The major features of the KRGDB are that it contains information on the Korean genomic variant frequency, frequency difference between the Korean and other populations and the variant functional annotation (such as regulatory elements in ENCODE regions and coding variant functions) of the variant sites. Additionally, we performed the genome-wide association study (GWAS) between Korean genome variant sites for the 30×230 individuals and three major common diseases (diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome). The association results are displayed on our browser. The KRGDB uses the MySQL database and Apache-Tomcat web server adopted with Java Server Page (JSP) and is freely available at http://coda.nih.go.kr/coda/KRGDB/index.jsp. Availability: http://coda.nih.go.kr/coda/KRGDB/index.jsp.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32133509      PMCID: PMC7056612          DOI: 10.1093/database/baz146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Database (Oxford)        ISSN: 1758-0463            Impact factor:   3.451


Introduction

Advances in sequencing technology (next-generation sequencing [NGS]) permit rapid nucleotide sequencing of large sections of genomes to be achieved at a lower cost than using classical Sanger sequencing methodology (1). In 2012, using the NGS technique, the 1000 Genome Project (1000 Genomes) sequenced and presented the whole genome and exome sequence variants of 1092 individuals (2). Completion of this project led to the development of dramatically more efficient sequencing technologies and, ultimately, led to a stream of personal genome sequencing projects (3–10). As a part of the global stream, two Korean groups conducted the whole genome sequencing of a total of 11 individuals (11–12). However, the sample size was insufficient to establish and evaluate a comprehensive map of Korean common and rare variants, and thus it was difficult to use the genome variants for other genome studies. Since 2009, the Center for Genome Science (CGS) of the Korea National Institute of Health (KNIH) has been reporting the findings of genome-wide association studies (GWASs), which have identified several epidemiological traits and diseases among Korean populations (13) and East Asian populations (14–15). The variants used in the GWASs were deposited in the Korean variant databases: KARE browser (16), Evo-SNP DB (17), and KGVDB (18). Given that the variant sites originated from comparison to the GRCh37 reference genome, which is not of Asian origin, studies on the Korean-specific variant sites were limited. Therefore, the CGS initiated the Korean Reference Genome project (KRG) in 2012 and has been conducting whole genome sequencing on a total of 1722 Korean individuals, wherein more than 32 million variants for the Korean population were identified, and a large proportion of the variants were detected for the first time. In this study, we constructed a database and web browser (the Korean Reference Genome Database [KRGDB]) for 27 million single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 4.9 million short insertion/deletion variants (indels) in the first phase from 622 individuals (2012–2014). Additionally in the first phase, testing was performed in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) between Korean genome variant sites for the 30×230 individuals and three major common diseases (diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome). The association results are displayed on our browser. Furthermore, 31 million SNVs and 4.2 million indels were identified in the second phase, from 1100 individuals (2015–2016). The KRGDB uses MySQL database and Apache-Tomcat web server adapted with Java Server Page (JSP) and is freely available at http://coda.nih.go.kr/coda/KRGDB/index.jsp.

Materials and methods

Sequencing subjects

In the first phase (2012–2014), 622 DNA samples of study subjects for the KRG were obtained from three different sources. The first source was the 63 participants of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), sequenced by 10× coverage depth. The second source was the 194 volunteers who participated in the Korean Genome Organization Conference, with 20× coverage. The third source was the 365 participants of a cohort study, known as the Ansan-Ansung cohort. The Ansan-Ansung cohort is a subset of the cohorts established by the Korean Genome Epidemiology Study (KoGES), in which 8842 individuals of the Ansan-Ansung cohort was previously genotyped by Affymetrix 5.0 SNP array and used in the GWASs (13). Of the 365 KoGES DNA samples, 135 individuals were sequenced by 10× coverage depth in 2012 and 20× coverage depth in 2013, and these were finally combined into 30× coverage depth (10×20×135). The remaining 230 KoGES DNA samples were sequenced by 30× coverage depth (30×230). The 30×230 participants approved the use of epidemiological and genotype data from the KoGES. In the second phase (2015–2016), 1100 individuals from the Korean Biobank Project were additionally sequenced and analyzed with 30× coverage. Table 1 summarizes the composition of the above KRG groups. HiSeq 2000 and HiSeq X Ten systems were used to produce DNA sequences in the first and second phases, respectively. Written informed consent was obtained from 1722 participants regarding the use of samples for whole genome sequencing, and this study was approved by the institutional review board of KNIH.
Table 1

The KRG individual groups

Phase No. of Individual Description Coverage Platform
The first phase (2012–2014)63Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey10×HiSeq 2000
194Volunteers who participated in the Korean Genome Organization Conference20×
230The Ansan-Ansung cohort (epidemiological and genotype data)30×
135The Ansan-Ansung cohort (genotype) : merged 30× (10× in 2012 and 20× in 2013)30× (10×+20×)
The second phase (2015–2016)1100The Korean Biobank Project30×HiSeq X Ten
The KRG individual groups

Alignment and variant calling

The raw sequences were trimmed by Sickle-quality-based-trimming, a tool that uses sliding windows along with quality and length thresholds. Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37 (GRCh37/hg19) was downloaded from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) ftp server (ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/), and the sequencing reads produced by HiSeq™ 2000 and HiSeq™ X Ten sequencing systems were aligned to GRCh37 using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) at default settings (19). We specified the quality threshold for read trimming using the –q 20 option to ensure high-quality reads for alignments. Thereafter, the BWA sample was used to generate alignments in the SAM format. PICARD was used for sorting, removing duplicate reads and converting from SAM to BAM format (http://picard.sourceforge.net/). In the first phase, SNVs and short indels were called using SAMtools ‘mpileup’ and ‘varFilter’ command with the –D 1000 option for specifying the coverage depth at min/max cutoffs of 3 and 1000, as well as options to disqualify SNPs that are too close to each other (20). The Isaac workflow was used to perform alignment and variant calling in the second phase (21).

Variant annotation resources

To compare the allele frequency differences (AFD) between Korean and other populations, we used the HapMap III and 1000 Genome population alternative allele frequency, downloaded from the UCSC genome browser database (ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/). Simply, AFD is calculated by subtraction of the AF in KRG from those of other ethnic groups. Functional annotations were also conducted by ANNOVAR software (http://www.openbioinformatics.org/annovar/) (22). The genomic locations of the variants were annotated using the gene-based annotation implemented in ANNOVAR. The risk associated with the variants was predicted using the filter-based annotation implemented in ANNOVAR with non-synonymous variants (LJB version 2.3) for the effect on protein function (SIFT, PolyPhen, Muration Assesor) (23–25) and evolutional conservation (PhyloP, GERP, Siphy) (26–28).

Analysis for the GWAS

The genomic variant risk associated with common diseases (diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome) in the Korean population were analyzed using PLINK (version 1.07) (29). The association study was conducted by logistic regression with additive genetic model and covariates of age, sex and body mass index. The population characteristics are described in Supplementary Table 1.

Results and discussion

System architecture

The KRGDB is a web-based integrated variant resource for visualizing the 1722 Korean allele frequencies and related annotations simultaneously. The system is constructed with JSP and MySQL database on the Apache-Tomcat platform. The graphical charts showing variant regions were implemented using the pure Java2D graphic library and Java Beans technology. Users can easily browse variant regions and resources after inputting system requirements, such as chromosome number, absolute position of the chromosome, gene name, dbSNP rsID and optional tracks that users wish to study. Our genome browser provides not only variants of the first and second phase, but also variants of 30× coverage group (1465 individuals) and all-merged group (1722 individuals) from both phases (see Table 1). Figure 1 describes the system architecture of the KRGDB and genome browser. The system mainly consists of databases and its genome browser. The variation/annotation database and genome browser intuitively provide and display information in the database. The database includes SNVs that are derived from 1000 Genomes, International HapMap III project (30), dbSNP (31) and mainly KRG variants. The browser describes these variants databases and includes useful information for annotation, such as KRG disease allele risk, KRG exonic variants, gene information (RefGene, Ensembl) (32–33), ClinVar (34), GWAS Catalog (35) and chromatin state segmentation from the Broad Institute (36). The majority of source files have been downloaded from the UCSC genome annotation database (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/database/), except for those associated with KRG disease allele risks (analyzed by PLINK software)(29) and exonic variants (analyzed by ANNOVAR software) (22). To accelerate browsing speed, the genome browser employs the Bin Indexing System (37), which is also used in the UCSC Genome browser. Detailed statistics and an explanation of current integrated resources will be discussed in the next section. The system has a focus on GRCh37, and the information in dbSNP build 151 is incorporated into the system. We, however, provide the lift-overed genomic positions of GRCh38 for convenient analysis between different assemblies. Certainly, our future research will contain remapping KRG individuals to GRCh38. The chain information file (from GRCh37 to GRCh38) has been downloaded from the UCSC liftOver web site (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgLiftOver). The information for annotation in KRG database will be approximately updated once every 3 months.
Figure 1

System architecture of KRGDB and Genome Browser. The system mainly consists of variation/annotation database and its genome browser.

System architecture of KRGDB and Genome Browser. The system mainly consists of variation/annotation database and its genome browser.

Alternative allele frequency differences with other populations

One of the useful functions of KRGDB is that the browser shows alternative allele frequency difference (AFD) for other ethnic groups. This is quite powerful because both identifying the ethnic-dependent allele frequency (AF) and showing distances among ethnic groups are possible with respect to genomic areas chosen by users. We therefore calculated AFDs from 622 individuals from the first phase. For example, Figure 2 shows AFD of four ethnic from HapMap III including Japanese (JPT), Chinese (CHB), CEPH European (CEU) and Yoruba African (YRI). Generally, Koreans are biologically much closer to JPT and CHB than CEU and YRI. AFDs, therefore, also reflect these aspects. In the charts, the green bars denote AFs more frequently found in the KRG studies, and the red bars denote AFs frequently found in other ethnic (non-Korean) groups. As another example, Figure 3 describes the AFD of four ethnic groups (Asian: ASN, Admixed American: AMR, European: EUR, African: AFR) from 1000 Genomes. The AFs of 1000 Genomes were downloaded from the ANNOVAR web site. We may predict that this is an Asian-specific variant region if the AFDs of the ASN in some regions are much smaller than those of other ethnic groups (AMR, EUR, AFR). Moreover, we would suspect a Korean-specific variant region if some area has large AFDs that are found in every ethnic group. However, it is clear that more validation and biological studies are required to finally establish this. Details of the AFD are shown in table form, with KRG’s AF and the AFDs of other ethnic groups, when users click on a specific red or green bar, in the same manner as described above.
Figure 2

Alternative allele frequency difference between KRG and HapMap III ethnics. The horizontal axis denotes the genomic positions of the chosen chromosome (chr1).

Figure 3

Alternative allele frequency difference between KRG and 1000 Genomes ethnics. The horizontal axis denotes the genomic positions of the chosen chromosome (chr1).

Alternative allele frequency difference between KRG and HapMap III ethnics. The horizontal axis denotes the genomic positions of the chosen chromosome (chr1). Alternative allele frequency difference between KRG and 1000 Genomes ethnics. The horizontal axis denotes the genomic positions of the chosen chromosome (chr1).

Associations of major common diseases

Among the 622 individuals from the first phase, we expanded our study to investigate the epidemiological and clinical data of 230 samples. The initial target diseases are type II diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome. The system provides the −logP values for these three common diseases and will be extended to cover other diseases. Figure 4 represents risk P values (–logP) for major common diseases. The meaning of the –logP values are genome-wide significance levels (–logP ≥ 8) and suggestive levels (8 > –logP ≥ 5). Variants with higher −logP values may be indicative of each specific disease. Complex diseases are also simultaneously involved with other diseases. In chart form, it becomes clear that type II diabetes is deeply related to metabolic syndrome and hypertension. The colored dots represent the odds ratio for a specific variant, with red and blue dots indicating odds ratio ≥1.0 and <1.0, respectively.
Figure 4

Disease risks of type II diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN) and metabolic syndrome (MS). Each dot represents risk P values (–logP). The red and blue colour indicates odds ratio ≥1.0 and <1.0, respectively. The horizontal axis denotes the genomic positions of the chosen chromosome (chr1).

Disease risks of type II diabetes (DM), hypertension (HTN) and metabolic syndrome (MS). Each dot represents risk P values (–logP). The red and blue colour indicates odds ratio ≥1.0 and <1.0, respectively. The horizontal axis denotes the genomic positions of the chosen chromosome (chr1).

Additional information

We have provided useful annotation resources for use with the features described in the above sections; for example, chromatin state segmentation information from ENCODE/Broad, GWAS Catalog, ClinVar and ANNOVAR analysis for non-synonymous variants (LJB version 2.3). The graphical components in these charts intuitively show additional detailed information when the cursor of the mouse is clicked or hovers over the component; this applies also for other tracks. The addition of further supporting annotations is ongoing.

Database statistics

The statistics of the variants database in Figure 1 are summarized in Supplementary Tables 2–6. In the first phase (2012–2014), KRG had a total 27 011 434 SNVs from 622 Koreans, including common and rare variants, and 31 750 003 SNVs from 1100 Koreans in the second phase (2015–2016). Common (alternative allele frequency ≥1%) variant distributions (8 672 646 SNVs from the first phase and 8 387 935 SNVs from the second phase) with respect to allele frequency range are described in Supplementary Table 2. In the first phase, the numbers of rare and short indel variants were 18 338 788 and 4 907 066, respectively. Likewise, 23 362 068 rare variants and 4 261 458 short indel variants were added in the second phase. We investigated 6 276 442 variants from 230 of 622 samples, to show disease association risk in the first phase. Supplementary Table 3 denotes the −logP distributions of the three diseases common among the Korean population: type II diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Supplementary Tables 4 and 5 denote the number of variants in each range of alternative allele frequency difference (AFD). The results were listed for each ethnic group. The overlapping variants between KRG and 1000 Genomes (Supplementary Table 5, four ethnic groups) have more entries than HapMap III (Supplementary Table 4, 11 ethnic groups) because variants from the 1000 Genomes were generated by genome sequencing technology. Typically, the biologically farer ethnics from Korean have bigger absolute AFD values in Supplementary Tables 4 and 5.

Conclusion

The main aim of the KRGDB is to provide a comprehensive map of Korean genetic variation to support studies of disease association and population genetics, and it has already been cited in analyses of variants found in individuals with genetic disorders (38–42). The KRGDB contains a large number of Korean variant sites, and a number of SNVs have not been included in the dbSNP151. Thus, our database offers the chance to confirm whether individual variants were already present in the general Korean population or whether they were present in a specific individual genome. Furthermore, the database, which includes alternative allele frequencies, can be used as a reference for understanding Korean or East Asian genomic diversity. Another expected application is the design of PCR primers and restriction enzyme sites. Moreover, the release of all summary statistics from the GWASs regarding three major common diseases (diabetes, hypertension and metabolic syndrome) is one of our useful outcomes. Users can perform meta-analysis using their own GWASs and our system. We believe that this database provides a quick reference that will aid the understanding of KRG features and facilitate research design based on KRG results. Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

1.  Whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive variant analysis of a Japanese individual using massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Akihiro Fujimoto; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Naoya Hosono; Kaoru Nakano; Tetsuo Abe; Keith A Boroevich; Masao Nagasaki; Rui Yamaguchi; Tetsuo Shibuya; Michiaki Kubo; Satoru Miyano; Yusuke Nakamura; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits.

Authors:  Yoon Shin Cho; Min Jin Go; Young Jin Kim; Jee Yeon Heo; Ji Hee Oh; Hyo-Jeong Ban; Dankyu Yoon; Mi Hee Lee; Dong-Joon Kim; Miey Park; Seung-Hun Cha; Jun-Woo Kim; Bok-Ghee Han; Haesook Min; Younjhin Ahn; Man Suk Park; Hye Ree Han; Hye-Yoon Jang; Eun Young Cho; Jong-Eun Lee; Nam H Cho; Chol Shin; Taesung Park; Ji Wan Park; Jong-Keuk Lee; Lon Cardon; Geraldine Clarke; Mark I McCarthy; Jong-Young Lee; Jong-Koo Lee; Bermseok Oh; Hyung-Lae Kim
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing.

Authors:  David A Wheeler; Maithreyan Srinivasan; Michael Egholm; Yufeng Shen; Lei Chen; Amy McGuire; Wen He; Yi-Ju Chen; Vinod Makhijani; G Thomas Roth; Xavier Gomes; Karrie Tartaro; Faheem Niazi; Cynthia L Turcotte; Gerard P Irzyk; James R Lupski; Craig Chinault; Xing-zhi Song; Yue Liu; Ye Yuan; Lynne Nazareth; Xiang Qin; Donna M Muzny; Marcel Margulies; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs; Jonathan M Rothberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Large-scale genome-wide association studies in East Asians identify new genetic loci influencing metabolic traits.

Authors:  Young Jin Kim; Min Jin Go; Cheng Hu; Chang Bum Hong; Yun Kyoung Kim; Ji Young Lee; Joo-Yeon Hwang; Ji Hee Oh; Dong-Joon Kim; Nam Hee Kim; Soeui Kim; Eun Jung Hong; Ji-Hyun Kim; Haesook Min; Yeonjung Kim; Rong Zhang; Weiping Jia; Yukinori Okada; Atsushi Takahashi; Michiaki Kubo; Toshihiro Tanaka; Naoyuki Kamatani; Koichi Matsuda; Taesung Park; Bermseok Oh; Kuchan Kimm; Daehee Kang; Chol Shin; Nam H Cho; Hyung-Lae Kim; Bok-Ghee Han; Jong-Young Lee; Yoon Shin Cho
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A highly annotated whole-genome sequence of a Korean individual.

Authors:  Jong-Il Kim; Young Seok Ju; Hansoo Park; Sheehyun Kim; Seonwook Lee; Jae-Hyuk Yi; Joann Mudge; Neil A Miller; Dongwan Hong; Callum J Bell; Hye-Sun Kim; In-Soon Chung; Woo-Chung Lee; Ji-Sun Lee; Seung-Hyun Seo; Ji-Young Yun; Hyun Nyun Woo; Heewook Lee; Dongwhan Suh; Seungbok Lee; Hyun-Jin Kim; Maryam Yavartanoo; Minhye Kwak; Ying Zheng; Mi Kyeong Lee; Hyunjun Park; Jeong Yeon Kim; Omer Gokcumen; Ryan E Mills; Alexander Wait Zaranek; Joseph Thakuria; Xiaodi Wu; Ryan W Kim; Jim J Huntley; Shujun Luo; Gary P Schroth; Thomas D Wu; HyeRan Kim; Kap-Seok Yang; Woong-Yang Park; Hyungtae Kim; George M Church; Charles Lee; Stephen F Kingsmore; Jeong-Sun Seo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++.

Authors:  Eugene V Davydov; David L Goode; Marina Sirota; Gregory M Cooper; Arend Sidow; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics.

Authors:  Boris Reva; Yevgeniy Antipin; Chris Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  KCNV2-Associated Retinopathy: Genetics, Electrophysiology, and Clinical Course-KCNV2 Study Group Report 1.

Authors:  Michalis Georgiou; Anthony G Robson; Kaoru Fujinami; Shaun M Leo; Ajoy Vincent; Fadi Nasser; Thales Antônio Cabral De Guimarães; Samer Khateb; Nikolas Pontikos; Yu Fujinami-Yokokawa; Xiao Liu; Kazushige Tsunoda; Takaaki Hayashi; Mauricio E Vargas; Alberta A H J Thiadens; Emanuel R de Carvalho; Xuan-Thanh-An Nguyen; Gavin Arno; Omar A Mahroo; Maria Inmaculada Martin-Merida; Belen Jimenez-Rolando; Gema Gordo; Ester Carreño; Ayuso Carmen; Dror Sharon; Susanne Kohl; Rachel M Huckfeldt; Bernd Wissinger; Camiel J F Boon; Eyal Banin; Mark E Pennesi; Arif O Khan; Andrew R Webster; Eberhart Zrenner; Elise Héon; Michel Michaelides
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  New insights into hallux valgus by whole exome sequencing study.

Authors:  Jun Jia; Junyi Li; Huiqi Qu; Mengyu Li; Sipeng Zhang; Jun Hao; Xinyi Gao; Xinyi Meng; Yan Sun; Hakon Hakonarson; Xiantie Zeng; Qianghua Xia; Jin Li
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Genetic Polymorphisms of Pesticide-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Agricultural Workers and Thyroid Hormone Levels.

Authors:  Jintana Sirivarasai; Suwanee Chanprasertyothin; Pornpimol Kongtip; Susan Woskie
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-08-18

4.  Real-world data analysis of patients with cancer of unknown primary.

Authors:  Sora Kang; Jae Ho Jeong; Shinkyo Yoon; Changhoon Yoo; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Hyungwoo Cho; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Jinhong Jung; Jeong Eun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Pathogenic NOTCH3 Variants Are Frequent Among the Korean General Population.

Authors:  Chul-Hoo Kang; Young Mee Kim; Yang-Ji Kim; Su-Jeong Hong; Do Yoon Kim; Hyun Goo Woo; Young Ree Kim; Joong-Goo Kim; Jung Seok Lee; Mi Hee Kong; Hyeon Ju Kim; Jay Chol Choi
Journal:  Neurol Genet       Date:  2021-12-06

6.  Whole genomic approach in mutation discovery of infantile spasms patients.

Authors:  Seungbok Lee; Sesong Jang; Jong-Il Kim; Jong Hee Chae; Ki Joong Kim; Byung Chan Lim
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  A single arm phase Ib/II trial of first-line pembrolizumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy for advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Choong-Kun Lee; Sun Young Rha; Hyo Song Kim; Minkyu Jung; Beodeul Kang; Jingmin Che; Woo Sun Kwon; Sejung Park; Woo Kyun Bae; Dong-Hoe Koo; Su-Jin Shin; Hyunki Kim; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Dae Young Zang; Sang Kil Lee; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Cheol Chung
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  A survey of genetic variants in SARS-CoV-2 interacting domains of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and TLR3/7/8 across populations.

Authors:  In-Hee Lee; Ji-Won Lee; Sek Won Kong
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  No association between SCN9A and monogenic human epilepsy disorders.

Authors:  James Fasham; Joseph S Leslie; Jamie W Harrison; James Deline; Katie B Williams; Ashley Kuhl; Jessica Scott Schwoerer; Harold E Cross; Andrew H Crosby; Emma L Baple
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.020

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.