| Literature DB >> 32133059 |
Kamaldeep Kaur1, Nirmal Singh1, R K Dhawan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Reperfusion of ischaemic myocardium results in reduced nitric oxide (NO) biosynthesis by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) leading to endothelial dysfunction and subsequent tissue damage. Impaired NO biosynthesis may be partly due to increased levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of eNOS. As dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) is a key enzyme responsible for degradation of ADMA, the present study was designed to explore the role of DDAH/ADMA/NO pathway in cardio-protective mechanism of ischaemic postconditioning.Entities:
Keywords: ADMA; DDAH; Myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury; Nitric Oxide; Postconditioning
Year: 2019 PMID: 32133059 PMCID: PMC7043882 DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2019.14067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Figure 1Diagrammatic representation of experimental protocol
Figure 2Effect of postconditioning on infarct size
Effect of postconditioning on coronary flow rate (ml/min) of rats
| Group | Basal |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 8.92 ± 0.23 | 8.6 ± 0.36 | 8.42 ± 0.32 | 8.08 ± 0.23 |
| Control | 8.00 0.25 | 4.32±.42a | 4.04 0.27a | 2.90 0.34a |
| Ischaemic PostC | 8.34 ± 0.35 | 8.00 ± 0.12b | 8.14 ± 0.195b | 7.88 ± 0.23b |
| Isch. PostC + L-Homocysteine | 8.52 ± 0.46 | 3.68 ±0.48*c | 3.92 ± 0.42*c | 3.56 ± 0.42*c |
| Isch. PostC + L-NAME | 8.86 0.35 | 4.92 ± 0.58*c | 5.62 ± 0.71*c | 4.54 ± 0.57*c |
Values are expressed as mean min-1±SD (n=6). Basal denotes coronary flow rate (C.F.R) measured before global ischaemia. 5RP, 30RP and 120 RP denotes C.F.R measured 5, 30 and 120 min. after reperfusion following global ischaemia.*P<0.001 vs Basal; a= P<0.05 vs Normal; b=P<0.05 vs Control; c=P<0.05 vs Isch PostC
Effect of postconditioning heart rate (beats/ min) of rat
| Group | Basal |
|
| 60RP |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 220 4.87 | 220 5.81 | 218 8.37 | 218 8.37 | 214 5.48 |
| Control (I/R Injury) | 200.8 8.02 | 126 14.87a | 160 11.4a | 142 1.8a | 76 11.60a |
| Ischaemic PostC | 216.2 ± 6.49 | 200 7.91b | 204 4.24b | 206 4.55b | 200 ± 6.24b |
| Isch. PostC + L-Homocysteine (300 µM) | 208.42 ± 7.14 | 105.6 ± 4.56*c | 110.62 ± 5.94*c | 100.24 ± 5.40*c | 92.06 ± 5.42*c |
| Isch. PostC + L-NAME | 220.2 5.24 | 110 ± 4.84*c | 120 ± 3.46*c | 150 ± 3.26*c | 105 ± 5.24*c |
Values are expressed as mean±SD (n=6). Basal denotes heart rate measured before global ischaemia. 5RP, 30RP, 60RP and 120RP denotes heart rate measured 5, 30, 60 and 120 min after reperfusion following sustained global ischaemia. *P<0.001 vs Basal; a= P<0.05 vs Normal; b =P<0.05 vs Control; c=P<0.05 vs Isch. PostC
Effect of postconditioning on left ventricular developed pressure (mm Hg) of rats
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Sham (Normal) | 86.5 ± 4.06 | 86.68 ± 6.70 |
| Control (I/R Injury) | 82.67 ± 3.46 | 48.58 ± 3.2*a |
| Isch. PostC | 85.34 ± 3.86 | 66.18 ± 3.46*b |
| Isch. PostC + L-Homocysteine | 84.34 ± 5.26 | 45.62 ± 3.8*c |
| Isch. PostC + L-NAME | 85.34 ± 5.86 | 44.64 ± 3.2*c |
Data is represented as mean±SD. *P˂0.05 vs Basal; a= P˂0.05 vs Normal; b= P˂0.05 vs Control; c=P˂0.05 vs Isch. PostC
Effect of postconditioning on dp/dt max and dp/dt min
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sham (Normal) | 3105 ±120 | 2957±148 | - 2560±210 | -2270±142 |
| Control (I/R Injury) | 3093±164 | 1876±167 | -3250± 145 | -1076±140 |
| Isch. PostC | 3224±125 | 3310± 204 | - 2983±216 | -2745±178 |
| Isch. PostC + L-Homocysteine (300 µM) | 3062±154 | 2057±164 | -2015±216 | -1776±140 |
| Isch. PostC + L-NAME (100 µM) | 3073±168 | 2057±164 | -2017±226 | -1876±160 |
Data is represented as mean±SD. a= P˂0.05 vs Normal; b= P˂0.05 vs Control; c= P˂0.05 vs Isch. PostC
Figure 3Effect of postconditioning on lactate dehydrogenase release (IU/L) of coronary effluent
Figure 4Effect of postconditioning on creatine kinase (IU/L)
Figure 5Effect of postconditioning on nitrite level (µM/L)
Figure 6Effect of postconditioning on dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase
Figure 7Effect of postconditioning on asymmetrical dimethylarginine level
Figure 8Histopathological changes in the myocardium (H & E staining)