Literature DB >> 32132767

A Nitrogen Physical Input-Output Model for Illinois.

Shweta Singh1, Jana E Compton2, Troy R Hawkins3, Daniel J Sobota4, Ellen J Cooter5.   

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) presents an important challenge for sustainability. Human intervention in the global nitrogen cycle has been pivotal in in providing goods and services to society. However, release of N beyond its intended societal use has many negative health and environmental consequences. Several systems modeling approaches have been developed to understand the trade-offs between the beneficial and harmful effects of N. These efforts include life cycle modeling, integrated management practices and sustainability metrics for individuals and communities. However, these approaches do not connect economic and ecological N flows in physical units throughout the system, which could better represent these trade-offs for decision-makers. Physical Input-Output Table (PIOT) based models present a viable complementary solution to overcome this limitation. We developed a N-PIOT for Illinois representing the interdependence of sectors in 2002, using N mass units. This allows studying the total N flow required to produce a certain amount of N in the final product. An Environmentally Extended Input Output (EEIO) based approach was used to connect the physical economic production to environmental losses; allowing quantification of total environmental impact to support agricultural production in Illinois. A bottom up approach was used to develop the N-PIOT using Material Flow Analysis (MFA) tracking N flows associated with top 3 commodities (Corn, Soybean and Wheat). These three commodities cover 99% of N fertilizer use in Illinois. The PIOT shows that of all the N inputs to corn production the state exported 68% of N embedded in useful products, 9% went to animal feed manufacturing and only 0.03% was consumed directly within the state. Approximately 35% of N input to soybean farming ended up in animal feed. Release of N to the environment was highest from corn farming, at about 21.8% of total N fertilizer inputs, followed by soybean (9.2%) and wheat farming (4.2%). The model also allowed the calculation of life cycle N use efficiency for N based on physical flows in the economy. Hence, PIOTs prove to be a viable tool for developing a holistic approach to manage disrupted biogeochemical cycles, since these provide a detailed insight into physical flows in economic systems and allow physical coupling with ecological N flows.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 32132767      PMCID: PMC7055531          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Modell        ISSN: 0304-3800            Impact factor:   2.974


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment.

Authors:  Julio A Camargo; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  A mixed-unit input-output model for environmental life-cycle assessment and material flow analysis.

Authors:  Troy Hawkins; Chris Hendrickson; Cortney Higgins; H Scott Matthews; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.

Authors:  Will Steffen; Katherine Richardson; Johan Rockström; Sarah E Cornell; Ingo Fetzer; Elena M Bennett; Reinette Biggs; Stephen R Carpenter; Wim de Vries; Cynthia A de Wit; Carl Folke; Dieter Gerten; Jens Heinke; Georgina M Mace; Linn M Persson; Veerabhadran Ramanathan; Belinda Reyers; Sverker Sörlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Spatiotemporal patterns of livestock manure nutrient production in the conterminous United States from 1930 to 2012.

Authors:  Qichun Yang; Hanqin Tian; Xia Li; Wei Ren; Bowen Zhang; Xuesong Zhang; Julie Wolf
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Ecosystem services altered by human changes in the nitrogen cycle: a new perspective for US decision making.

Authors:  Jana E Compton; John A Harrison; Robin L Dennis; Tara L Greaver; Brian H Hill; Stephen J Jordan; Henry Walker; Holly V Campbell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-05-29       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Climate change impacts of US reactive nitrogen.

Authors:  Robert W Pinder; Eric A Davidson; Christine L Goodale; Tara L Greaver; Jeffrey D Herrick; Lingli Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Costs and benefits of nitrogen for Europe and implications for mitigation.

Authors:  Hans J M Van Grinsven; Mike Holland; Brian H Jacobsen; Zbigniew Klimont; Mark A Sutton; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin.

Authors:  Richard B Alexander; Richard A Smith; Gregory E Schwarz; Elizabeth W Boyer; Jacqueline V Nolan; John W Brakebill
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States.

Authors:  Gidon Eshel; Alon Shepon; Tamar Makov; Ron Milo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Beef and coal are key drivers of Australia's high nitrogen footprint.

Authors:  Xia Liang; Allison M Leach; James N Galloway; Baojing Gu; Shu Kee Lam; Deli Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.